Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 705–718

Perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: MRI diagnosis and surgical planning

MRI in fistulazing perianal Crohn’s disease
  • Edyta Szurowska
  • Joanna Wypych
  • Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska
Article

Abstract

Crohn’s disease is a chronic, transmural inflammatory process of the gastrointestinal tract. It often affects the colon with the perianal area. The most common intestinal manifestations include external and/or internal fistulas and abscesses. Assessment of the activity of perianal fistulas in the course of Crohn’s disease seems to be an important factor influencing therapeutic approach. Fistula’s activity is evaluated by such methods as magnetic resonance imaging, anal ultrasound and examination under anaesthesia. Usefulness of imaging methods in the diagnosis of fistulas still remains to be defined.

MRI is used to present a wide spectrum of perianal fistulazing Crohn’s disease. Additionally, it is an important instrument revealing location, extent and severity of inflammation. It is also very helpful to detect clinically silent sepsis related to small, local inflammation. The most common method used in MR imaging to assess topography of a fistula’s track, is Parks’ classification.

Clinical indications to MRI may include follow-up studies of a diagnosed disease, classification of fistulas’ subtypes in the course of Crohn’s disease, determination of the extent of fistulas’ tracts and spread of an inflammatory process what can guide surgical procedures.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease Perianal fistulas MRI Digestive system 

References

  1. 1.
    Young Y, Abreu MT. (2006) Advances in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 8: 470–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Panaccione R, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Sandborn WJ. (2002) The natural history of fistulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 122: 875–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hellers G, Bergstrand O, Ewerth S, Holmstrom B. (1980) Occurrence and outcome after primary treatment of anal fistulae in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1980; 21:525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamm MA. (2006) Review article: biological drugs in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 24 (Suppl 3): 80–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, et al. (2000) A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology; 121: 1064–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bressler B, Sands BE. (2006) Review article: Medical therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 24: 1283–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, et al. (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360:1661–1662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, et al. (2003) AGA technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 125: 1508–1530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, et al. (1999) Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 340: 1398–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. (2004) Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 350: 876–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al. (2002) A review of activity indices and efficacy endpoints for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 122:512–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, et al. (2003) Response of fistulating Crohn’s disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:387–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Gastroenterological Association. (2003) AGA technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 125: 1508–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    HalliganS, Buchanan G. (2003) MR imaging of fistula-in-ano. Eur J Radiol. 47: 98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irvine EJ. (1995) Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn’s disease as measured by a new disease activity index. J Clin Gastroenterol 20: 27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caprilli R, Viscido A, Guagnozzi D. (2002) Review article: biological agents in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 16: 579–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. (1985) Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum. 28: 103–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, Maeda K, Nitta N, Takahashi M, Tsujikawa T, Fujiyama Y, Murata K, Sakamoto T (2004) Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics. 24: 689–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. (1991) Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg. 78: 445–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh B, McC Mortensen NJ, Jewell DP, George B. (2004) Perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 91: 801–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, Kessels AG, Vliegen RF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM. (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology. 218: 75–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haggett PJ, Moore NR, Shearman JD, Travis SP, Jewell DP, Mortensen NJ. (1995) Pelvic and perineal complications of Crohn’s disease: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging. Gut 36: 407–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 20: 623–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horsthuis K, Stoker J. (2004) MRI of perianal Crohn’s Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183: 1309–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 63: 1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Taylor S, Williams A, Cohen R, Bartram C. (2004) MRI of fistula in ano: inter- and intraobserver agreement and effects of directed education. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183:135–140PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edyta Szurowska
    • 1
  • Joanna Wypych
    • 2
  • Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Radiology MedicalUniversity of GdanskGdanskPoland
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMedical University of GdanskGdanskPoland
  3. 3.Department of Patology MedicalUniversity of GdanskGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations