Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 171–181 | Cite as

Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging

  • M. D’Onofrio
  • G. Zamboni
  • N. Faccioli
  • P. Capelli
  • R. Pozzi Mucelli


The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has lead to great developments in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound. Second generation contrast media, characterized by harmonic responses at low mechanical index of the ultrasound beam, have already proven usefulness in the study of the liver but other abdominal organs can take advantage from the dynamic study during continuous ultrasonographic scans. The dynamic observation of the enhancement allows the perfect evaluation of the abdominal organs perfusion. The perfusion of the pancreas is well correlated to the semeiology of the gland parenchymography at CEUS. The study of the pancreas is a new and promising application of CEUS. CEUS can be used to better identify pancreatic lesions respect to conventional Ultrasound (US) or to characterize pancreatic lesions already visible at US. Moreover the staging of some pancreatic lesions can be improved by the use of contrast media. This article will review the clinical application of CEUS in the different pancreatic pathologies.


Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Mass-forming pancreatitis Pancreatic tumors Pancreatic pseudocyst Pancreatic metastates 


  1. 1.
    D’Onofrio M, Rozzanigo U, Caffarri S, et al. (2004) Contrast-enhanced US of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med 107:293–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quaia E, Stacul F, Gaiani S, et al. (2004) Comparison of diagnostic performance of unenhanced vs SonoVue-enhanced ultrasonography in focal liver lesions characterization. The experience of three Italian centers. Radiol Med 108:71–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quaia E, Degobbis F, Tona G, et al. (2004) Differential patterns of contrast enhancement in different focal liver lesions after injection of the microbubble US contrast agent SonoVue. Radiol Med 107:155–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Falconi M, Procacci C (2004) Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor: value of contrast enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 29:246–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cosgrove D (2004) Advances in contrast agent imaging using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing technology (CPS) and SonoVue. Eur Rad 14(Suppl 8)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawson P, Cosgrove DO, Grainger RG (1999) Textbook of contrast media. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical MediaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D’Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Vasori S, et al. (2003) Contrast enhanced ultrasonographic detection of small pancreatic insulinoma. J Ultrasound Med 22:413–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takeda K, Goto H, Hirooka Y, et al. (2003) Contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions. Acta Radiol 44:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorén I, Lasson A, Fork T, et al. (1999) New sonographic imaging observations in focal pancreatitis. Eur Radiol 9:862–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Malagò R, Martone E, Falconi M, Capelli P, Mansueto G (2005) Pancreatic pathology. In: Quaia E, ed. Contrast media in ultrasonography. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Onofrio M, Rozzanigo U, Masinielli BM, et al. (2005) Hypoechoic focal liver lesions: characterization with contrast enhanced ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 33:164–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Onofrio M, Martone E, Faccioli N, et al. (2006) Focal liver lesions: sinusoidal phase of CEUS. Abdom Imaging Jun 26; [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim T, Murakami T, Takamura M, et al. (2001) Pancreatic mass due to chronic pancreatitis: correlation of CT and MR imaging features with pathologic findings. AJR 177:367–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T, Morita K (1997) Inflammatory pancreatic masses: differentiation from ductal carcinomas with contrast-enhanced sonography using carbon dioxide microbubbles. AJR 169:1263–1267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Gulik TM, Reeders JW, Bosma A, et al. (1997) Incidence and clinical findings of benign, inflammatory disease in patients resected for pancreatic head cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 46:417–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Remer EM, Baker ME (2002) Imaging of chronic pancreatitis. Radiol Clin N Am 40:1229–1242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Furukawa N, Muranaka T, Yasumori K, et al. (1998) Autoimmune pancreatitis: radiologic findings in three histologically proven cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:880–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N, et al. (2004) Contrast enhanced sonography of autoimmune pancreatitis. Comparison with pathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 23:199–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koga Y, Yamaguchi K, Sugitani A, et al. (2002) Autoimmune pancreatitis starting as a localized form. J Gastroenterol 37:133–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klöppel G, Schlüter E (1999) Pathology of the pancreas. In: Baert AL, Delorme G, Van Hoe L, eds. Radiology of the pancreas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 69–100Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oshikawa O, Tanaka S, Ioka T, et al. (2002) Dynamic sonography of pancreatic tumors: comparison with dynamic CT. AJR 178:1133–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ozawa Y, Numata K, Tanaka K, et al. (2002) Contrast-enhanced sonography of small pancreatic mass lesions. J Ultrasound Med 21:983–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D’Onofrio M, Malago R, Zamboni G, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography better identifies pancreatic tumor vascularization than helical CT. Pancreatology 5:398–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced sonography of pancreatic carcinoma: correlations with pathological findings. J Gastroenterol 40:631–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S, et al. (2001) Nonfunctioning endocrine tumors of the pancreas: possibilities of spiral CT characterization. Eur Radiol 11:1175–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rossi P, Allison DJ, Bezzi M, et al. (1989) Endocrine tumors of the pancreas. Radiol Clin N Am 27:129–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D’Onofrio M, Malago R, Vecchiato F, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of small solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: enhancement pattern and pathologic correlation of 2 cases. J Ultrasound Med 24:849–854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Flath B, Rickes S, Schweigert M, et al. (2003) Differentiation of pancreatic metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma from primary pancreatic carcinoma by echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography. Pancreatology 3:349–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Megibow AJ (2003) Secondary pancreatic tumors: imaging. In: Procacci C, Megibow AJ, eds. Imaging of the pancreas. Cystic and rare tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 277–288Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Procacci C, Biasiutti C, Carbognin G, et al. (2001) Pancreatic neoplasms and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 11(Suppl 2):S167–S192Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Compagno J, Oertel JE (1978) Mycrocystic adenomas of the pancreas (glycogen-rich cystoadenomas). A clinicopathologic study of 34 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 69:289–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Procacci C, Biasiutti C, Carbognin G, et al. (1999) Characterization of cystic tumors of the pancreas: CT accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:906–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Procacci C, Carbognin G, Biasiutti C, et al. (2001) Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: imaging findings. Radiol Med 102:23–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carbognin G, Tapparelli M, Petrella E, et al. (2003) Serous cystic tumors. In: Procacci C, Megibow AJ, eds. Imaging of the pancreas. Cystic and rare tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 31–37Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Procacci C, Graziani R, Bicego E, et al. (1997) Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: report of 30 cases with emphasis on the imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:373–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Procacci C, Graziani R, Bicego E, et al. (1996) Intraductal mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas: imaging findings. Radiology 198:249–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hammond N, Miller FH, Sica GT, Gore RM (2002) Imaging of cystic disease of the pancreas. Radiol Clin N Am 40:1243–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Compagno J, Oertel JE (1978) Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with overt and latent malignancy (cystadenocarcinoma and cystadenoma). A clinicopathologic study of 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 69:573–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cohen-Scali F, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, et al. (2003) Discrimination of unilocular macrocystic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic pseudocyst and mucinous cystadenoma with CT: initial observations. Radiology 228:727–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Buetow PC, Rao P, Thompson LDR (1998) Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 18:433–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fugazzola C, Procacci C, Bergamo Andreis IA, et al. (1991) Cystic tumors of the pancreas: evaluation by ultrasonography and computer tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 16:53–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sperti C, Cappellazzo F, Pasquali C, et al. (1993) Cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: problems in differential diagnosis. Am Surg 59:740–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Demos TC, Posniak HV, Harmath C, et al. (2002) Cystic lesions of the pancreas. AJR 179:1375–1388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scott J, Martin I, Redhead D, et al. (2000) Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: imaging features and diagnostic difficulties. Clin Radiol 55:187–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sachs JR, Deren JJ, Sohn M, Nusbaum M (1989) Mucinous cystadenoma: pitfalls of differential diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol 84:811–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kuba H, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu S, et al. (1998) Chronic asymptomatic pseudocyst with sludge aggregates masquerading as mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. J Gastroenterol 33:766–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    De Lima JE Jr, Javitt MC, Mathur SC (1999) Residents’ teaching files: mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. Radiographics 19:807–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S, et al. (2001) CT features of malignant mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 11:1626–1630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    D’Onofrio M, Caffarri S, Zamboni G, et al. (2004) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma. J Ultrasound Med 23:1125–1129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Procacci C, Megibow AJ, Carbognin G, et al. (1999) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 19:1447–1463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Procacci C, Carbognin G, Biasiutti C, et al. (2001) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of CT and MR findings with pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 11:1939–1951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zamboni G, Capelli P, Bogina G, et al. (2003) Pathology of intraductal cystic tumors. In: Procacci C, Megibow AJ, eds. Imaging of the pancreas. Cystic and rare tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 85–94Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Itoh T, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. (2005) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 100:144–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Procacci C, Schenal G, Della Chiara E, et al. (2003) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors: imaging. In: Procacci C, Megibow AJ, eds. Imaging of the pancreas. Cystic and rare tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 97–137Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    EFSUMB Study Group (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultrashall Med 25:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nordback I, Saaristo R, Piironen A, Sand C (2004) Chest computed tomography in the staging of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nakaya H (2005) Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound exposure promotes uptake of methotrexate into synovial cells and enhanced antiinflammatory effects in the knees of rabbits with antigen-induced arthritis. Arth Rheum 52:2559–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Liu Y, Yang H, Sakanishi A (2005) Ultrasound: mechanical gene transfer into plant cells by sonoporation. Biotechnol Adv 24:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    van Wamel A, Bouakaz A, Bernard B, et al. (2005) Controlled drug delivery with ultrasound and gas microbubbles. J Control Release 101:389–391PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D’Onofrio
    • 1
  • G. Zamboni
    • 1
  • N. Faccioli
    • 1
  • P. Capelli
    • 2
  • R. Pozzi Mucelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyG.B. Rossi Hospital, University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PathologyG.B. Rossi Hospital, University of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations