Advertisement

Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 524–534 | Cite as

Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause

  • A. FurukawaEmail author
  • M. Sakoda
  • M. Yamasaki
  • N. Kono
  • T. Tanaka
  • N. Nitta
  • S. Kanasaki
  • K. Imoto
  • M. Takahashi
  • K. Murata
  • T. Sakamoto
  • T. Tani
INVITED UPDATE

Abstract

Gastrointestinal tract perforation is an emergent condition that requires prompt surgery. Diagnosis largely depends on imaging examinations, and correct diagnosis of the presence, level, and cause of perforation is essential for appropriate management and surgical planning. Plain radiography remains the first imaging study and may be followed by intraluminal contrast examination; however, the high clinical efficacy of computed tomographic examination in this field has been well recognized. The advent of spiral and multidetector-row computed tomographic scanners has enabled examination of the entire abdomen in a single breath-hold by using thin-slice sections that allow precise assessment of pathology in the alimentary tract. Extraluminal air that is too small to be detected by conventional radiography can be demonstrated by computed tomography. Indirect findings of bowel perforation such as phlegmon, abscess, peritoneal fluid, or an extraluminal foreign body can also be demonstrated. Gastrointestinal mural pathology and associated adjacent inflammation are precisely assessed with thin-section images and multiplanar reformations that aid in the assessment of the site and cause of perforation.

Keywords

Perforation Gastrointestinal tract Alimentary tract CT 

References

  1. 1.
    Maniatis, V, Chryssikopoulos, H, Roussakis, A,  et al. 2000Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomographyAbdom Imaging25373379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ongolo-Zogo, P, Borson, O, Garcia, P,  et al. 1999Acute gastrointestinal peptic ulcer perforation: contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral CT findings in 10 patientsAbdom Imaging24329332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeffrey, RB, Federle, MP, Wall, S 1983Value of computed tomography in detecting occult gastrointestinal perforationJ Comput Assist Tomogr7825827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stapakis, JC, Thickman, D 1992Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest filmJ Comput Assist Tomogr16713716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, CH, Huang, HS, Yang, CC,  et al. 2001The features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomographyHepatogastroenterology4813931396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, H, Vibhakar, SD, Bellon, EM 1983Gastrointestinal perforation: early diagnosis by computed tomographyJ Comput Assist Tomogr7226229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fultz, PJ, Skucas, J, Weiss, CL 1992CT in upper gastrointestinal perforation secondary to peptic ulcer diseaseGastrointest Radiol1758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glazer, GM, Buy, JN, Moss, AA,  et al. 1981CT detection of duodenal perforationAJR137333336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hofer, GA, Cohen, AJ 1989CT signs of duodenal perforation secondary to blunt abdominal traumaJ Comput Assist Tomogr13430432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shilyansky, J, Pearl, RF, Kreller, M,  et al. 1997Diagnosis and management of duodenal injury in childrenJ Pediatr Surg32880886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grassi, R, Pinto, A, Rossi, G,  et al. 1998Conventional plain film radiology ultrasonography and CT in jejuno-ileal perforationActa Radiol395256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horrow, MM, White, DS, Horrow, DO, JC 2003Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CTRadiology2274651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao, PM, Rhea, JT, Novelline, RA 1997Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinationsJ Comput Assist Tomogr21686692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balthazar, EJ, Megibow, AJ, Siegel, SE,  et al. 1991Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CTRadiology1802124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao, PM, Rhea, JT, Novelline, RA 1997Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examinationRadiology202139144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wijetunga, R, Tan, BT, Rouse, JC,  et al. 2001Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitisRadiology2217474753Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oliak, D, Sinow, R, French, S,  et al. 1999Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitisAm Surg65959964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saeki, M 1988Computed tomographic analysis of colonic perforation; “dirty mass” a new computed tomographic findingEmerg Radiol5140145Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hulnick, DH, Megibow, AJ, Balthazar, EJ,  et al. 1987Perforated colorectal neoplasms: correlation of clinical, contrast enema, and CT examinationsRadiology164611615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shaffer, HA 1992Perforation and obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. Assessment by conventional radiologyRadiol Clin North Am30405426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cho, KC, Baker, SR, Cho, KC, Baker, SR 1994Extraluminal air. Diagnosis and significanceRadiol Clin North Am32829844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rice, RP, Thompson, VM, Gegaudas, RK 1982The diagnosis and significance of extraluminal gas in the abdomenRadiol Clin North Am20819837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghahremani, GG, Ghahremani, GG 1993Radiologic evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal perforationsRadiol Clin North Am3112191234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foley, MJ, Ghahremani, GG, Rogers, LF 1982Reappraisal of contrast media used to detect upper gastrointestinal perforations. Comparison of water-soluble media with barium sulfateRadiology144231237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho, KC, Baker, SR 1994Extraluminal air. Diagnosis and significanceRadiol Clin North Am32829844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cimmino CV, Sholes DK Jr (1952) Gas in the lessor sac in perforated peptic ulcer. AJR 68;19–21Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han, SY, Tishler, JM 1984Perforation of the abdominal segment of the esophagusAJR143751754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Healy, ME, Mindelzun, RE 1984Lesser sac pneumoperitoneum secondary to perforation of the intraabdominal esophagusAJR142325326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cho2000Manifestations of intraperitoneal airMeyers, MA eds. Dynamic radiology of the abdomenSpringer-VerlagNew York309331Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cho, KC, Baker, SR 1781Air in the fissure for the ligamentum teres: new sign of intraperitoneal air on plain radiographsRadiology91489492Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyers, MA 2000The extraperitoneal spaces: normal and pathologic anatomyMeyers, MA eds. Dynamic radiology of the abdomenSpringer-Verlag New York333492Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meyers, MA, Volberg, F, Katzen, B,  et al. 1973Haustral anatomy and pathology: a new look. I. Roentgen identification of normal patterns and relationshipsRadiology108497504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meyers, MA, Volberg, F, Katzen, B,  et al. 1973Haustral anatomy and pathology: a new look. II. Roentgen identification of normal patterns and relationshipsRadiology108505512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stahl, JD, Goldman, SM, Minkin, SD,  et al. 1977Perforated duodenal ulcer and pneumomediastinumRadiology12423 25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roh, JJ, Thompson, JS, Harned, RK,  et al. 1983Value of pneumoperitoneum in the diagnosis of visceral perforationAm J Surg146830833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Felson, B, Wiot, JF 1973Another look at pneumoperitoneumSemin Roentgenol8437443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller, RE, Becker, GJ, Slabaugh, RD 1981Nonsurgical pneumoperitoneumGastrointest Radiol67374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dunn, V, Nelson, JA 1979Jejunal diverticulosis and chronic pneumoperitoneumGastrointest Radiol4165168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Greenstein, AJ, Mann, D, Heimann, T,  et al. 1987Spontaneous free perforation and perforated abscess in 30 patients with Crohn’s diseaseAnn Surg2057276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ghahremani, GG, Gore, RM 1989CT diagnosis of postoperative abdominal complicationsRadiol Clin North Am27787804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hele, DA, Molly, M, Pearl, RH,  et al. 1997Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisalAnn Surg225252261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bugis, SP, Blair, NP, Letwin, ER 1992Management of blunt and penetrating colon injuriesAm J Surg163547550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Meyers, MA, Ghahremani, GG 1975Complications of fiberoptic endoscopy. II. ColonoscopyRadiology115301307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Miki, T, Ogata, S, Uto, M,  et al. 2004Multidetector-row CT findings of colonic perforation: direct visualization of ruptured colonic wallAbdom Imaging29659662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Furukawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Sakoda
    • 1
  • M. Yamasaki
    • 1
  • N. Kono
    • 1
  • T. Tanaka
    • 1
  • N. Nitta
    • 1
  • S. Kanasaki
    • 2
  • K. Imoto
    • 3
  • M. Takahashi
    • 1
  • K. Murata
    • 1
  • T. Sakamoto
    • 3
  • T. Tani
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyShiga University of Medical ScienceSeta Tsukinowa-cho OtsuJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKouseikai Takeda HospitalKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyKoga City HospitalJapan
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryShiga University of Medical ScienceSeta Tsukinowa-cho OtsuJapan

Personalised recommendations