Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 341–347 | Cite as

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Spectrum of contrast-enhanced gray-scale harmonic sonography findings

Pictorial essay

Abstract

Sonography (US) is the most commonly used tool in the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease. Nevertheless, small nodules can be overlooked. Moreover, even if the lesion is readily recognizable, difficulty persists in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from pre-tumoral, dysplastic stages of nodule evolution. In addition, US is the main tool in guiding percutaneous ablation therapies for HCC and in evaluating patients after treatment, but changes are not specific and difficulties persist in recognizing residual tumor during and after the ablation procedure. Contrast-enhanced, gray-scale, harmonic US offers new possibilities in the imaging of liver tumors. The real-time, low-mechanical index technique employed in our institution allows a true dynamic assessment of the tumor during the various phases of contrast medium circulation. This pictorial essay focuses on typical and atypical appearances of HCC when imaged with contrast-specific, real-time US. Findings useful for lesion detection, differential diagnosis, posttreatment assessment, and follow-up especially are illustrated. The potential role of contrast-enhanced US in various clinical settings is emphasized.

Keywords

Liver, hepatocellular carcinoma—Liver, percutaneous ablation therapy—Liver, sonography—Sonography, contrast media—Sonography, technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Lencioni, R, Cioni, D, Bartolozzi, C 2002Tissue harmonic and contrast-specific imaging: back to gray scale in ultrasoundEur Radiol12151165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartolozzi, C, Lencioni, R 2001Contrast-specific ultrasound imaging of focal liver lesions. Prologue to a promising future. Eur Radiol111314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burns, PN, Wilson, SR, Simpson, DH 2000Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrastInvest Radiol355871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding, H, Kudo, M, Maekawa, K,  et al. 2001Detection of tumor parenchymal blood flow in hepatic tumors: value of second harmonic imaging with a galactose-based contrast agentHepatol Res21242251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, TK, Choi, BI, Han, JK,  et al. 2000Hepatic tumors: contrast agent-enhancement patterns with pulse-inversion harmonic USRadiology216411417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer, A, Solbiati, L, Wessman, N 2002Ultrasound imaging with SonoVue: low mechanical index real-time imagingAcad Radiol9282284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lencioni, R, Cioni, D, Crocetti, L,  et al. 2002Ultrasound imaging of focal liver lesions with second-generation contrast agentAcad Radiol9371374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bertolotto, M, Dalla Palma, L, Quaia, E,  et al. 2000Characterization of unifocal liver lesions with pulse inversion harmonic imaging after Levovist injection: preliminary results.Eur Radiol1013691376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Numata, K, Tanaka, K, Kiba, T,  et al. 2001Contrast-enhanced, wide-band harmonic gray scale imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with helical computed tomographic imagesJ Ultrasound Med208998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    von Herbay, A, Vogt, C, Haussinger, D 2002Pulse inversion US in the early phase of the sonographic contrast agent Levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.J Ultrasound Med2111911200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamamoto, K, Shiraki, K, Deguchi, M,  et al. 2002Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using digital subtraction imaging with contrast agent, Levovist: comparison with helical CT, digital subtraction angiography, and US angiographyOncol Rep9789792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strobel, D, Raeker, S, Martus, P,  et al. 2003Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler US for the characterization of focal liver lesionsInt J Colorectal Dis1863672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meuwly, JY, Schnyder, P, Gudinchet, F,  et al. 2003Pulse-inversion harmonic imaging improves lesion conspicuity during US-guided biopsyJ Vasc Intervent Radiol14335341Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skjoldbye, B, Pedersen, MH, Struckmann, J,  et al. 2002Improved detection and biopsy of solid liver lesions using pulse-inversion ultrasound scanning and contrast agent infusionUltrasound Med Biol28439444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Numata, K, Isozaki, T, Ozawa, Y,  et al. 2003Percutaneous ablation therapy guided by contrast-enhanced US for patients with hepatocellular carcinomaAJR180143149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding, H, Kudo, M, Onda, H,  et al. 2001Contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic US for evaluating treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinomaAJR176661666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ding, H, Kudo, M, Onda, H,  et al. 2001Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CTRadiology221721730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wen, YL, Kudo, M, Zheng, RQ,  et al. 2003Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic USAJR1815763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esteban, JM, Gil, J 2002Therapeutic effect of chemoembolization therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with contrast-enhanced harmonic imagingAcad Radiol9382383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minami, Y, Kubo, M, Kawasaki, T,  et al. 2003Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: usefulness of coded phase-inversion harmonic USAJR180703708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morimoto, M, Shirato, K, Sugimori, K,  et al. 2003Contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonographic–histologic correlation of the therapeutic effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinomaAJR1816569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schneider, M, Arditi, M, Barrau, MB,  et al. 1995BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubblesInvest Radiol30415417Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Catalano, O, Esposito, M, Nunziata, A,  et al. 2000Multiphase helical CT findings after percutaneous ablation procedures for hepatocellular carcinomaAbdom Imaging25607614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solbiati, L, Tonolini, M, Cova, L,  et al. 2003

    Guidance and control of percutaneous treatments.

    Solbiati, LMartegani, ALeen, E eds. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver diseasesSpringer-Verlag ItaliaMilan103113
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyS.Maria delle Grazie Hospital, via Domitiana Loc.La Schiana, Pozzuoli, 80078Italy

Personalised recommendations