Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transjugular liver biopsy: assessment of safety and efficacy of the Quick-Core biopsy needle

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: We assessed the safety and efficacy of transjugular liver biopsy with the Quick-Core biopsy needle.

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with liver failure and contraindications to percutaneous liver biopsy were referred for transjugular liver biopsy. Eighteen (36%) patients had thrombocytopenia (platelet range = 44–92/μL, mean = 66/μL), 31 (62%) patients had elevated prothrombin times (international normalized ratio range = 1.3–3, mean = 1.6), and 19 (38%) patients had ascites. The Cook Quick-Core biopsy needle was used.

Results: Average procedure time was 30 min. Transjugular access to the hepatic veins was successful in 49 of 50 cases. A transfemoral approach was used in one patient. Tissue specimens were satisfactory for histologic diagnosis in all cases. Established cirrhosis was present in 37 (74%) patients. The mean number of cores was 2.2 (range = 1–3). The mean number of portal triads per core was 10.4 (range = 6–20). There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusion: Transjugular liver biopsy with the Quick-Core biopsy needle is safe and effective in patients in whom the percutaneous route is contraindicated by coagulopathy or ascites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 27 September 2001/Revision accepted: 9 January 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruzzi, J., O'Connell, M., Thakore, H. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: assessment of safety and efficacy of the Quick-Core biopsy needle. Abdom Imaging 27, 711–715 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-002-0020-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-002-0020-8

Navigation