Advertisement

Normalization by bone volume instead of body weight or lean body mass may be better for quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT

  • 39 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    van der Bruggen W, Hagelstein-Rotman M, de Geus-Oei L-F, Smit F, Dijkstra PDS, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, et al. Quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04657-1.

  2. 2.

    Collins MT, Kushner H, Reynolds JC, Chebli C, Kelly MH, Gupta A, et al. An instrument to measure skeletal burden and predict functional outcome in fibrous dysplasia of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;20:219–26.

  3. 3.

    Rohren EM, Etchebehere EC, Araujo JC, Hobbs BP, Swanston NM, Everding M, et al. Determination of skeletal tumor burden on 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1507–12.

  4. 4.

    Janmahasatian S, Duffull SB, Ash S, Ward LC, Byrne NM, Green B. Quantification of lean bodyweight. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44:1051–65.

  5. 5.

    Marin JFG, Duarte PS, de Amorim de Carvalho JW, Sado HN, Sapienza MT, Buchpiguel CA. Comparison of the variability of SUV normalized by skeletal volume with the variability of SUV normalized by body weight in 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med Technol. 2019;47:60–3.

  6. 6.

    Carvalho G, Marin JFG, Garcez AT, Duarte PS, Sapienza MT, Buchpiguel CA. SUV normalized by skeletal volume on 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:529–33.

  7. 7.

    Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, Sera T, Sattler B, Boellaard R. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:17–31.

  8. 8.

    Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):11S–20S.

  9. 9.

    Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology. 1993;189:847–50.

  10. 10.

    Tahari AK, Chien D, Azadi JR, Wahl RL. Optimum lean body formulation for correction of standardized uptake value in PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1481–4.

  11. 11.

    Gafita A, Calais J, Franz C, Rauscher I, Wang H, Roberstson A, et al. Evaluation of SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) in Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT: a bi-centric analysis. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:103.

  12. 12.

    Blau M, Ganatra R, Bender MA. 18F-fluoride for bone imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 1972;2:31–7.

  13. 13.

    Kurdziel KA, Shih JH, Apolo AB, Lindenberg L, Mena E, McKinney YY, et al. The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1175–84.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Paulo Schiavom Duarte.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Orthopedics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duarte, P.S., Sapienza, M.T. Normalization by bone volume instead of body weight or lean body mass may be better for quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04688-z

Download citation