Textural features of hypoxia PET predict survival in head and neck cancer during chemoradiotherapy
- 53 Downloads
The aim of this study was to investigate whether textural features of tumour hypoxia, assessed with serial [18F]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-PET, were able to predict clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC, T1-4, N+, M0) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
In a preliminary evaluation of a prospective trial, tumour hypoxia was evaluated in 29 patients via serial FMISO-PET before and during CRT. All patients received an initial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET before CRT, and tumour regions were defined on this FDG-PET. The first-order metrics tumour-to-background ratio (TBRmean, TBRmax, TBRpeak), coefficient of variation, total lesion uptake and integral non-uniformity were calculated for all scans. Further, 3 second-order (textural) features from two grey-level matrices were calculated, as well as differential non-uniformity (udiff). Prognostic value was examined by median split for group separation (GS) in Kaplan-Meier estimates and correlated with overall survival (OS), quantified via log-rank tests (p ≤ 0.05) and group-relative hazard ratios (HR).
Within a median follow-up of 29.6 months (95% CI: 16.8–48.0 months), no first-order metrics predicted OS with a significant GS (all p > 0.05) on any FMISO-PET scan. Only udiff before and in week 2 during CRT (p = 0.03, HR = 10.8 and p = 0.05, HR = 5.2) and non-uniformity from grey-level run length matrix in week 2 separated prognostic groups (p = 0.05, HR = 5.3); lower values were correlated with better OS. Further, the decrease in udiff from before CRT to week 2 was correlated with better OS (p = 0.04, HR = 9.4). FDG-PET before CRT did not predict outcome in any measure.
Textural features on FMISO-PET scans before CRT, in week 2 and, to a limited degree, the change of features during CRT, were able to identify head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with better OS, suggesting that a higher homogeneity of the degree of hypoxia in tumours could correlate with a better outcome after CRT.
KeywordsRadiomics Hypoxia FMISO FDG HNSCC CRT
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 4.Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, Brizel D, Lartigau E, Stadler P, et al. Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rischin D, Hicks RJ, Fisher R, Binns D, Corry J, Porceddu S, et al. Prognostic significance of [18F]-misonidazole positron emission tomography-detected tumor hypoxia in patients with advanced head and neck cancer randomly assigned to chemoradiation with or without tirapazamine: a substudy of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2098–104. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Zips D, Zöphel K, Abolmaali N, Perrin R, Abramyuk A, Haase R, et al. Exploratory prospective trial of hypoxia-specific PET imaging during radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:21–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wiedenmann NE, Bucher S, Hentschel M, Mix M, Vach W, Bittner MI, et al. Serial [18F]-fluoromisonidazole PET during radiochemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer and its correlation with outcome. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:113–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Zschaeck S, Haase R, Abolmaali N, Perrin R, Stützer K, Appold S, et al. Spatial distribution of FMISO in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas during radio-chemotherapy and its correlation to pattern of failure. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2015;54:1355–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1074720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Bittner M-I, Wiedenmann N, Bucher S, Hentschel M, Mix M, Weber WA, et al. Exploratory geographical analysis of hypoxic subvolumes using 18F-MISO-PET imaging in patients with head and neck cancer in the course of primary chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013;108:511–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Löck S, Perrin R, Seidlitz A, Bandurska-Luque A, Zschaeck S, Zöphel K, et al. Residual tumour hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing primary radiochemotherapy, final results of a prospective trial on repeat FMISO-PET imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2017;124:533–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hatt M, Majdoub M, Vallieres M, Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Groheux D, et al. 18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:38–44. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.144055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe J-A, Garcia CA, Vanderlinden B, Buvat I. Tumor texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET: relationships between texture parameters, histogram indices, standardized uptake values, metabolic volumes, and total lesion glycolysis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:414–22. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.129858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lucia F, Visvikis D, Desseroit M-C, Miranda O, Malhaire J-P, Robin P, et al. Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:768–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3898-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Reuzé S, Orlhac F, Chargari C, Nioche C, Limkin E, Riet F, et al. Prediction of cervical cancer recurrence using textural features extracted from 18F-FDG PET images acquired with different scanners. Oncotarget. 2017;8:43169–79. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17856.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, Metges J-P, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:369–78. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.082404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Cheng N-M, Dean Fang Y-H, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Huang C-G, Tsan D-L, Ng S-H, et al. Textural features of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT images: prognostic significance in patients with advanced T-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1703–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.119289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Cook GJR, Yip C, Siddique M, Goh V, Chicklore S, Roy A, et al. Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy? J Nucl Med. 2013;54:19–26. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.107375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S. Initiative for the IBS. Image biomarker standardisation initiative. Arxiv Prepr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.17195/candat.2016.08.1.
- 29.Vallières M, Freeman CR, Skamene SR, El Naqa I. A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:5471–96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Schaefer A, Kremp S, Hellwig D, Rübe C, Kirsch C, Nestle U. A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1989–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0875-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA Performance measurements of scintillation cameras. Washington DC: Standards Publication NU 1-1994; 1994.Google Scholar
- 36.Vallières M. MATLAB programming tools for radiomics analysis 2015. https://github.com/mvallieres/radiomics/ (accessed February 19, 2018).
- 37.Antunes J, Viswanath S, Rusu M, Valls L, Hoimes C, Avril N, et al. Radiomics analysis on FLT-PET/MRI for characterization of early treatment response in renal cell carcinoma: a proof-of-concept study. Transl Oncol. 2016;9:155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.01.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing author. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.Google Scholar
- 41.Vaupel P, Shi K, Mayer A. Influence of diffusion limitations of PET tracers on imaging of tumor hypoxia. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018;194:S94.Google Scholar