Advertisement

Broadening horizons with 225Ac-DOTATATE targeted alpha therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour patients stable or refractory to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT: first clinical experience on the efficacy and safety

  • Sanjana Ballal
  • Madhav Prasad Yadav
  • Chandrasekhar BalEmail author
  • Ranjit Kumar Sahoo
  • Madhavi Tripathi
Original Article
  • 109 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Oncology – General

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate and present the early results on the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of 225Ac-DOTATATE targeted alpha therapy (TAT) in patients with advanced, progressive, 177Lu-DOTATATE refractory, and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expressing metastatic GEP-NETs.

Methods

In this prospective study, we recruited patients with metastatic GEP-NETs who were stable or progressive disease on 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Systemic TAT using 225Ac-DOTATATE was performed in all the patients with 225Ac-DOTATATE (100 kBq/kg body weight) at an interval of 8 weeks. The primary end point was to assess the objective response (measured by RECIST 1.1 and functional M.D. Anderson criteria). The secondary end points included biochemical response assessment as per the Italian Trials in Medical Oncology (ITMO), adverse event profile as per CTCAE v5.0, and clinical response assessment by the quality of life (assessed with EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 patient-based questionnaire).

Results

Between April 2018 and March 2019, 32 patients (17 females, 15 males, mean age 52 ± 9.2 years, 35–72 years) with either stable disease after completing 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy (14, 44%) or progressive disease on 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy (18, 56%) were included in the study. The morphological response was assessed in 24/32 patients that revealed partial remission in 15 and stable disease in 9. There was no documented disease progression or deaths in the median follow-up of 8 months (range 2–13 months). There was a significant decrease in the plasma chromogranin level post-225Ac-DOTATATE therapy (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Our short-term clinical results indicate 225Ac-DOTATATE TAT as a promising treatment option which adds a new dimension in patients who are refractory to 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy or have reached the maximum prescribed cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy.

Keywords

225Ac-DOTATATE therapy Targeted alpha therapy GEP-NET 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical clearance

Ethical clearance received Ref. No. IEC-517.

Informed consent

Informed consent obtained from all patients.

Disclaimer

This work has not been submitted elsewhere as a full article or has not under consideration to any other journal.

References

  1. 1.
    Rinke A, Müller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Klose KJ, Barth P, Wied M, et al. PROMID Study Group. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumour growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumours: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2009;7:4656–4663.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delavault P, Caplin ME, Liyanage N, Blumberg J. The CLARINET study: assessing the effect of lanreotide autogel on tumour progression-free survival in patients with nonfunctioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. J Clin Oncol. 2017;30(15_suppl).  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.tps4153 Published online January 31, 2017.
  3. 3.
    Yao JC, Fazio N, Singh S, Buzzoni R, Carnaghi C, Wolin E, et al. RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumours, Fourth Trial (RADIANT-4) Study Group. Everolimus for the treatment of advanced, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract (RADIANT-4): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;387:968–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, Bang YJ, Borbath I, Lombard-Bohas C, et al. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:501–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yao JC. Neuroendocrine tumours. molecular targeted therapy for carcinoid and islet-cell carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21:163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. NETTER-1 Trial Investigators. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-DOTATATE for midgut neuroendocrine tumours. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim SJ, Pak K, Koo PJ, Kwak JJ, Chang. The efficacy of 177Lu-labelled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours: a meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1964–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bodei L, Cremonesi M, Grana CM, Fazio N, Iodice S, Baio SM, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE: the IEO phase I-II study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ballal S, Yadav MP, Damle NA, Sahoo RK, Bal C. Concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE and capecitabine therapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours: a long-term-outcome, toxicity, survival, and quality-of-life study. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e457–e66.  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Navalkissoor S, Grossman A. Targeted alpha particle therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: the next generation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Neuroendocrinology. 2019;108:256–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nayak TK, Norenberg JP, Anderson TL, Prossnitz ER, Stabin MG, Atcher RW. Somatostatin- receptor-targeted alpha-emitting 213Bi is therapeutically more effective than beta(−)-emitting 177Lu in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miederer M, Henriksen G, Alke A, Mossbrugger I, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the alpha-particle generator nuclide 225Ac for somatostatin receptor radiotherapy of neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3555–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norenberg JP, Krenning BJ, Konings IR, Kusewitt DF, Nayak TK, Anderson TL, et al. 213Bi-[DOTA0, Tyr3]octreotide peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of pancreatic tumours in a preclinical animal model. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan HS, Konijnenberg MW, de Blois E, Koelewijn S, Baum RP, Morgenstern A, et al. Influence of tumour size on the efficacy of targeted alpha therapy with (213)Bi- [DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]-octreotate. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan HS, Konijnenberg MW, Daniels T, Nysus M, Makvandi M, de Blois E, et al. Improved safety and efficacy of 213Bi-DOTATATE- targeted alpha therapy of somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine tumours in mice pre-treated with L-lysine. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Bruchertseifer F, Mier W, Apostolidis C, Boll R, et al. 213Bi-DOTATOC receptor-targeted alpha-radionuclide therapy induces remission in neuroendocrine tumours refractory to beta radiation: a first-in-human experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2106–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song H, Hobbs RF, Vajravelu R, Huso DL, Esaias C, Apostolidis C, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of breast cancer metastases with alpha-particle emitter 225Ac: comparing efficacy with 213Bi and 90Y. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8941–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Publish Date: November 27, 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumours. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costelloe CM, Chuang HH, Madewell JE, Ueno NT. Cancer response criteria and bone metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST. J Cancer. 2010;1:80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumours in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd edition) Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1008–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted α-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1624–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjana Ballal
    • 1
  • Madhav Prasad Yadav
    • 1
  • Chandrasekhar Bal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ranjit Kumar Sahoo
    • 2
  • Madhavi Tripathi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear MedicineAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, AIIMSNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Medical Oncology, BR Ambedkar Rotary Cancer HospitalAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations