Advertisement

Small-voxel reconstructions significantly influence SUVs in PET imaging

  • Daniëlle KoopmanEmail author
  • Pieter L. Jager
  • Jorn A. van Dalen
Letter to the Editor
  • 94 Downloads

Notes

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

D.K., P.L.J. and J.v.D. wrote the letter together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Fuentes-Ocampo F, López-Mora DA, Flotats A, Paillahueque G, Camacho V, Duch J, et al. Digital vs. analog PET/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4256-0.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Lagerweij MC, Arkies H, de Boer J, Oostdijk AH, et al. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions. J Nucl Med Technol. 2015;43(1):21–7.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.114.147215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Arkies H, Oostdijk AH, Francken AB, Bart J, et al. Diagnostic implications of a small-voxel reconstruction for loco-regional lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using FDG-PET/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0359-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nuclear MedicineIsalaZwolleThe Netherlands
  2. 2.MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical MedicineUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Medical PhysicsIsalaZwolleThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations