Bloodpool SPECT as part of bone SPECT/CT in painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA): validation and potential biomarker of prosthesis biomechanics
- 84 Downloads
To compare bloodpool SPECT with planar imaging in bone SPECT/CT of painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with respect to inter-rater agreement, confidence, prosthesis outcome, and biomechanical functioning.
Retrospective study of bloodpool SPECT and planar control images. Four raters used the validated Bruderholz scheme and a 5-point scale to grade uptake. Inter-rater agreement and overall confidence scores were calculated. Variable cluster analysis was performed to identify patterns of uptake, and associations between patterns and prosthesis outcome and biomechanical functioning were examined.
In all, 55 knees in 43 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 17 months; revision rate 21.8%). SPECT significantly improved inter-rater agreement in 24% of regions (all P < 0.05) and overall confidence by 20% (P < 0.001). Regional uptake cluster analysis showed improved antero-posterior separation with SPECT, and distinct patterns associated with prosthesis survival in lateral femoral (P = 0.041) and medial tibial (P < 0.001) regions. The prognostic value of SPECT outperformed planar imaging for tibial (P < 0.001), patellar (P = 0.009), and synovial (P = 0.040) assessment. Internal femoral malrotation resulted in increased uptake in posteromedial (P = 0.042) and anterolateral (P = 0.016) femoral, and lateral patellar (P = 0.011) regions. Internal tibial malrotation increased uptake in posterolateral (P = 0.026) and posteromedial tibial (P = 0.005), and medial patellar regions (P = 0.004). Bloodpool SPECT improved the prognostic value of late-phase SPECT/CT for the assessment of the medial tibial region.
Bloodpool SPECT outperforms planar assessment of painful TKAs and the identification of distinct uptake patterns make it a potentially clinically relevant biomarker of prosthesis survival and biomechanical functioning.
KeywordsSPECT/CT SPECT Bloodpool Bone scintigraphy Total knee arthroplasty
This study was funded by the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the Antwerp University Hospital.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
- 8.Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G, Van der Wall H. Radionuclide and hybrid bone imaging. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
- 12.Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Konala P, Kerner A, Rasch H, Cobb JP, et al. A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(7):939–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hofmann S. There is an optimal rotational alignment in total knee replacement: femoral rotation does matter. In: Hirschmann MT, Becker R, editors. The unhappy total knee replacement: a comprehensive review and management guide. Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Pujol N, Berhouet J, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. There is an optimal rotational alignment in total knee replacement: tibial rotation does matter. In: Hirschmann MT, Becker R, editors. The unhappy total knee replacement: a comprehensive review and management guide. Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 20.Anderberg M. Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press; 1973.Google Scholar
- 23.Lu SJ, Ul Hassan F, Vijayanathan S, Gnanasegaran G. Radionuclide bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of knee pain: comparing two-phase bone scintigraphy, SPECT and SPECT/CT. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1090):20180168.Google Scholar