Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer

  • Benjamin Houdu
  • Charline Lasnon
  • Idlir Licaj
  • Guy Thomas
  • Pascal Do
  • Anne-Valerie Guizard
  • Cédric Desmonts
  • Nicolas AideEmail author

Correction to: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows:
Fig. 3

Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax. Overall survival Kaplan Meyer curves according to different scenarios. a Use of the optimal PSF and EARL SUVmax cutoff values on their respective datasets. b Use of the PSF and EARL SUVmax cutoff values switched across datasets. c Use of the PSF and EARL SUVmax cutoff values on a simulated multicentre dataset

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Medicine DepartmentUniversity HospitalCaenFrance
  2. 2.Nuclear Medicine DepartmentFrançois Baclesse Cancer CentreCaenFrance
  3. 3.INSERM ANTICIPENormandie UniversityCaenFrance
  4. 4.Clinical Research DepartmentFrançois Baclesse Cancer CentreCaenFrance
  5. 5.Medical Informatics DepartmentFrançois Baclesse Cancer CentreCaenFrance
  6. 6.Lung Cancer UnitFrançois Baclesse Cancer CentreCaenFrance
  7. 7.Regional Cancer RegistryFrançois Baclesse Cancer CentreCaenFrance

Personalised recommendations