Advertisement

Comparison of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) PET/CT, SPECT/CT and 3T MRI for the localisation of occult insulinomas: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in a prospective crossover imaging study

  • Kwadwo Antwi
  • Melpomeni Fani
  • Tobias Heye
  • Guillaume Nicolas
  • Christof Rottenburger
  • Felix Kaul
  • Elmar Merkle
  • Christoph J. Zech
  • Daniel Boll
  • Deborah R. Vogt
  • Beat Gloor
  • Emanuel Christ
  • Damian Wild
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Benign insulinomas are the most prevalent cause of endogenous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (EHH) in adults, and because of their small size are difficult to localise. The purpose of the study was to test the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) PET/CT using 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 in consecutive adult patients referred for localisation of insulinomas. The results were compared with 111In-DOTA-exendin-4 SPECT/CT, study-MRI and previously performed external CT and/or MRI (prior external CT/MRI).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with neuroglycopenic symptoms due to EHH. GLP-1R PET/CT, SPECT/CT and study-MRI were performed in a randomised, crossover order within 3–4 days. The reference standard was surgery with histology and treatment outcome.

Results

From January 2014 until March 2017, 52 patients were recruited. All imaging and invasive procedures before recruitment identified suspicious lesions in 46.2% of patients. GLP-1R PET/CT, SPECT/CT and study-MRI detected suspicious lesions in 78.8%, 63.5% and 63.4% of patients, respectively. In 38 patients, conclusive histology was available for final analysis.

Accuracy (95% confidence interval) for PET/CT, SPECT/CT, study-MRI and prior external CT/MRI was 93.9% (87.8–97.5%), 67.5% (58.1–76.0%), 67.6% (58.0–76.1%) and 40.0% (23.9–57.9%), respectively (all P values < 0.01, except comparison of SPECT/CT and study-MRI with a P value = 1.0). Impact on clinical management was 42.3%, 32.7% and 33.3% for PET/CT, SPECT/CT and study-MRI, respectively. Percentage reading agreement was 89.5%, 75.7%, and 71.1% for PET/CT, SPECT/CT and study-MRI, respectively.

Conclusion

68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT performed significantly better than 111In-DOTA-exendin-4 SPECT/CT and MRI in the localisation of benign insulinomas and should be considered in patients where localisation fails with CT/MRI (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02127541).

Keywords

Insulinoma Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor GLP-1R PET/CT GLP-1R SPECT/CT MRI 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients who participated in the trial, the referring physicians and the local investigators who contributed to the trial, and the technicians who did the labelling and the scans. We especially thank Prof. Aurel Perren, Institute of Pathology, University Bern, Switzerland, for pathological review, and Astrid Roesler, Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland, for monitoring the study.

Funding

The study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 320030-152938) and the Desirée and Niels Yde Foundation (grant number 389-12), which had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the regional scientific ethics committee, and all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the regional scientific ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

259_2018_4101_MOESM1_ESM.docx (749 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 748 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Grant CS. Insulinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19:783–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, Strobel O, Schneider L, Hartwig W, et al. Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2011;396:1197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wenning AS, Kirchner P, Antwi K, Fani M, Wild D, Christ E, et al. Preoperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor imaging reduces surgical trauma and pancreatic tissue loss in insulinoma patients: a report of three cases. Patient Saf Surg. 2015;9:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu H, Peng C, Zhang S, Wu Y, Fang H, Sheng H, et al. Strategy for the surgical management of insulinomas: analysis of 52 cases. Dig Surg. 2007;24:463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiesli P, Brändle M, Schmid C, Krähenbühl L, Furrer J, Keller U, et al. Selective arterial calcium stimulation and hepatic venous sampling in the evaluation of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia: potential and limitations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guettier JM, Kam A, Chang R, Skarulis MC, Cochran C, Alexander HR, et al. Localization of insulinomas to regions of the pancreas by intraarterial calcium stimulation: the NIH experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1074–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Placzkowski KA, Vella A, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Reading CC, Charboneau JW, et al. Secular trends in the presentation and management of functioning insulinoma at the Mayo Clinic, 1987-2007. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1069–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehrabi A, Fischer L, Hafezi M, Dirlewanger A, Grenacher L, Diener MK, et al. A systematic review of localization, surgical treatment options, and outcome of insulinoma. Pancreas. 2014;43:675–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reubi JC, Waser B. Concomitant expression of several peptide receptors in neuroendocrine tumours: molecular basis for in vivo multireceptor tumour targeting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:781–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wild D, Mäcke H, Christ E, Gloor B, Reubi JC. Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor scans to localize occult insulinomas. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:766–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christ E, Wild D, Ederer S, Béhé M, Nicolas G, Caplin ME, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor imaging for the localisation of insulinomas: a prospective multicentre imaging study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sowa-Staszczak A, Pach D, Mikołajczak R, Mäcke H, Jabrocka-Hybel A, Stefańska A, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor imaging with [Lys40(Ahx-HYNIC- 99mTc/EDDA)NH2]-exendin-4 for the detection of insulinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:524–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin WH, Delbeke D, Patton JA, Sandler MP. Detection of malignancies with SPECT versus PET, with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology. 1996;198:225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wild D, Wicki A, Mansi R, Béhé M, Keil B, Bernhardt P, et al. Exendin-4-based radiopharmaceuticals for glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor PET/CT and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1059–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antwi K, Fani M, Nicolas G, Rottenburger C, Heye T, Reubi JC, et al. Localization of hidden Insulinomas with 68Ga-DOTA-Exendin-4 PET/CT: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1075–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo Y, Pan Q, Yao S, Yu M, Wu W, Xue H, et al. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor PET/CT with 68Ga-NOTA-Exendin-4 for detecting localized Insulinoma: a prospective cohort study. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:715–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu L, Xue H, Sun Z, Li P, Qian T, Xing X, et al. Prospective comparison of biphasic contrast-enhanced CT, volume perfusion CT, and 3 Tesla MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for insulinoma detection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46:1648–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:543–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christ E, Wild D, Antwi K, Waser B, Fani M, Schwanda S, et al. Preoperative localization of adult nesidioblastosis using 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4-PET/CT. Endocrine. 2015;50:821–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ehman RL, McNamara MT, Brasch RC, Felmlee JP, Gray JE, Higgins CB. Influence of physiologic motion on the appearance of tissue in MR images. Radiology. 1986;159:777–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Christ E, Wild D, Forrer F, Brändle M, Sahli R, Clerici T, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor imaging for localization of insulinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:4398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Triponez F, Cadiot G. Non-functioning tumours of the pancreas in MEN1 patients. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:295–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prasad V, Sainz-Esteban A, Arsenic R, Plöckinger U, Denecke T, Pape UF, et al. Role of (68)Ga somatostatin receptor PET/CT in the detection of endogenous hyperinsulinaemic focus: an explorative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kauhanen S, Seppänen M, Minn H, Gullichsen R, Salonen A, Alanen K, et al. Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) positron emission tomography as a tool to localize an insulinoma or beta-cell hyperplasia in adult patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakuz TS, Berger E, El-Rabadi K, Wadsak W, Haug A, Hacker M, et al. Clinical value of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT with contrast enhancement and without Carbidopa premedication in patients with Insulinoma. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:353–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Imperiale A, Sebag F, Vix M, Castinetti F, Kessler L, Moreau F, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT imaging of insulinoma revisited. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Service FJ, Natt N. The prolonged fast. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3973–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwadwo Antwi
    • 1
  • Melpomeni Fani
    • 1
  • Tobias Heye
    • 1
  • Guillaume Nicolas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christof Rottenburger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Felix Kaul
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elmar Merkle
    • 1
  • Christoph J. Zech
    • 1
  • Daniel Boll
    • 1
  • Deborah R. Vogt
    • 3
  • Beat Gloor
    • 4
  • Emanuel Christ
    • 2
    • 5
  • Damian Wild
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Centre for Neuroendocrine and Endocrine TumoursUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity Hospital Basel and University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Visceral SurgeryUniversity Hospital of BernBernSwitzerland
  5. 5.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and MetabolismUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations