Visual and statistical analysis of 18F-FDG PET in primary progressive aphasia
- 1.1k Downloads
Diagnosing progressive primary aphasia (PPA) and its variants is of great clinical importance, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be a useful diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability in the interpretation of FDG PET images in PPA as well as the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the technique. We also aimed to compare visual and statistical analyses of these images.
There were 10 raters who analysed 44 FDG PET scans from 33 PPA patients and 11 controls. Five raters analysed the images visually, while the other five used maps created using Statistical Parametric Mapping software. Two spatial normalization procedures were performed: global mean normalization and cerebellar normalization. Clinical diagnosis was considered the gold standard.
Inter-rater concordance was moderate for visual analysis (Fleiss’ kappa 0.568) and substantial for statistical analysis (kappa 0.756–0.881). Agreement was good for all three variants of PPA except for the nonfluent/agrammatic variant studied with visual analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of each rater’s diagnosis of PPA was high, averaging 87.8 and 89.9 % for visual analysis and 96.9 and 90.9 % for statistical analysis using global mean normalization, respectively. In cerebellar normalization, sensitivity was 88.9 % and specificity 100 %.
FDG PET demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of PPA and its variants. Inter-rater concordance was higher for statistical analysis, especially for the nonfluent/agrammatic variant. These data support the use of FDG PET to evaluate patients with PPA and show that statistical analysis methods are particularly useful for identifying the nonfluent/agrammatic variant of PPA.
Keywords18F-FDG PET Brain imaging Primary progressive aphasia Statistical Parametric Mapping
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Conflicts of interest
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 14.Lehman VT, Carter RE, Claasen DO, Murphy RC, Lowe V, Petersen RC, et al. Visual assessment versus quantitative three-dimensional sterotactic surface projection fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:721–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Yamame T, Ikari Y, Nishio T, Ishii K, Ishii K, Kato T, et al. Visual-statistical interpretation of (18)F-FDG-PET images for characteristic Alzheimer patterns in a multicenter study: inter-rater concordance and relationship to automated quantitative evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:244–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Matias-Guiu JA, Cabrera-Martín MN, García-Ramos R, Moreno-Ramos T, Valles-Salgado M, Carreras JL, et al. Evaluation of the new consensus criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2014;38:147–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar