Evaluation of 11C-choline PET/CT for primary diagnosis and staging of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a pilot study

  • Naoto Sassa
  • Katsuhiko Kato
  • Shinji Abe
  • Shingo Iwano
  • Shinji Ito
  • Mitsuru Ikeda
  • Kazuhiro Shimamoto
  • Seiichi Yamamoto
  • Tokunori Yamamoto
  • Momokazu Gotoh
  • Shinji Naganawa
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted a pilot study to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of PET/CT with 11C-choline (choline PET/CT) for primary diagnosis and staging of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-UC).

Methods

Enrolled in this study were 16 patients (9 men, 7 women; age range 51 – 83 years, mean ± SD 69 ± 10.8 years) with suspected UUT-UC. The patients were examined by choline PET/CT, and 13 underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy. Lymphadenectomy and chemotherapy were also performed as necessary in some of the patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were confirmed to have UUT-UC (7 renal pelvis carcinoma and 5 ureteral carcinoma), 1 had malignant lymphoma (ureter), 1 had IgG4-related disease (ureter), and 2 had other benign diseases (ureter).

Results

Of the 16 study patients, 13 showed definite choline uptake in urothelial lesions, and of these, 11 had UUT-UC, 1 had malignant lymphoma, and 1 had IgG4-related disease. Three patients without choline uptake comprised one with UUT-UC and two with benign diseases. Of the 12 patients with UUT-UC, 3 had distant metastases, 2 had metastases only in the regional lymph nodes, and 7 had no metastases. Distant metastases and metastases in the regional lymph nodes showed definite choline uptake. The outcome in patients with UUT-UC, which was evaluated 592 – 1,530 days after surgery, corresponded to the patient classification based on the presence or absence of metastases and locoregional or distant metastases. Choline uptake determined as SUVmax 10 min after administration was significantly higher than at 20 min in metastatic tumours of UUT-UC (p < 0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the SUVmax values at 10 and those at 20 min in primary tumours of UUT-UC.

Conclusion

This study suggests that choline PET/CT is a promising tool for the primary diagnosis and staging of UUT-UC.

Keywords

11C-Choline PET/CT Urothelial carcinoma Upper urinary tract Renal pelvis Ureter 

Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (renal pelvis and ureter; UUT-UC) is an infrequent genitourinary malignancy accounting for 5 % of urothelial cancers and less than 10 % of renal tumours [1]. Analysis of epidemiological and survival patterns of UUT-UC over the past 30 years in a review of a large, population-based database in the USA has shown that the incidence of UUT-UC has slowly risen, and that increasing patient age, male gender, Afro-American race, bilateral UUT-UC and regional/distant disease are all associated with poorer survival [2].

For the primary diagnosis and staging of UUT-UC, radiographic imaging by intravenous and retrograde pyelography and CT scanning, ureteroscopic visualization and biopsy of the tumour, and urine cytology are usually performed. Although 18F-FDG is the radiopharmaceutical most frequently used in PET, FDG is not a useful tracer for the detection of primary tumours of the urinary tract because of its renal excretion. Therefore, the utility of FDG PET in the detection of urinary tract tumours is limited to distant metastases [3, 4]. It has been reported that FDG PET/CT is superior to conventional evaluations in detecting occult metastases in patients with invasive bladder cancer [5, 6]. However, another study has shown no advantage of FDG PET/CT over CT alone for lymph node staging in invasive bladder cancer [7].

A number of studies have demonstrated that PET/CT with 11C-choline (choline PET/CT) is useful in the detection of lymph node metastases of prostate cancer [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] and also the detection of primary prostate cancer with certain limitations [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies on the efficacy of choline PET/CT in the initial diagnosis and local staging of UUT-UC. The purpose of this pilot study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of choline PET/CT in localizing the primary tumour and staging of UUT-UC. In this study, the effects of the choline PET/CT findings on the clinical management of UUT-UC and the outcomes in patients with UUT-UC were also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Patients

All procedures followed the clinical guidelines of our hospital and were approved by the institutional review board. A complete description of the study was given to all participating patients and a consent form was signed by the patients. We enrolled 16 consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of UUT-UC (9 men, 7 women; age range 51 – 83 years, mean ± SD 69 ± 10.8 years) who were referred to the Department of Urology of our hospital between March 2008 and January 2011. All patients were examined using choline PET/CT 3 – 65 days (mean 19.2 days) before surgery. The patients were classified clinically according to the 2009 TNM staging system [21]. Two patients were inoperable and one patient needed no surgery; all remaining patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy together with partial cystectomy (LNUx). In the patients who were diagnosed with lymph node metastases, lymphadenectomy was performed. In addition, after choline PET/CT some of the patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin [22, 23] and chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, with gemcitabine and carboplatin, and with gemcitabine .

Choline PET/CT image acquisition

PET and CT imaging was performed using a combined PET/CT system (Biograph Sensation 16; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany, and Hoffman Estates, IL). The system combines a full-ring PET scanner equipped with lutetium orthosilicate crystal detectors and a 16-slice high-resolution spiral CT scanner. All patients were examined after fasting for 6 h. Choline PET/CT was performed 10 and 20 min after intravenous injection of 3.7 MBq/kg of 11C-choline. In the PET/CT scanner, the patients were positioned head first and supine. Their arms were down and their hands were clasped on the abdomen throughout the scanning procedure rather than elevated above the head. This position was chosen in consideration of patient comfort. First, a topogram was acquired to define the imaging range for both CT and PET. The range was typically chosen to extend from the scull base to the mid-thigh level. A single nonenhanced continuous spiral multislice CT scan was performed (120 kVp tube voltage, 100 mAs effective tube current, 16 × 1.5-mm detector configuration, gantry rotation time 420 ms, 30-mm table feed per rotation). The dose was adjusted to the actual level of attenuation. For this purpose, attenuation was measured during the first half of helical rotation, and the effective tube current was automatically modulated for the second half (CARE Dose; Siemens Medical Solutions, Hoffman Estates, IL). Data were acquired for 1 min per bed position following the CT scan. In all patients scanning was started caudally and progressed cranially. The mean radiation doses used in this study were 1.1 mSv in choline PET and 7.05 mSv in CT.

CT and PET images were reconstructed using standard clinical protocols. CT images with a matrix size of 512 × 512 and a slice thickness of 3 mm with a 1.5-mm increment were generated using filtered back-projection. PET images with a matrix size of 128 × 128 were reconstructed using a 3-D numerical reconstruction algorithm (e.soft; Siemens Medical Solutions). CT-derived attenuation maps were used for PET attenuation correction.

PET/CT data analysis

For visual and quantitative analysis, images were displayed on a clinical image analysis workstation that allowed interactive exploration of CT, PET and fused PET/CT image data. The loci where choline uptake was visibly higher than the activity of adjacent areas were tentatively considered uptake-positive. For each uptake-positive locus the intensity of uptake was further analysed semiquantitatively. For this purpose the coronal slice that contained the maximum uptake was selected and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with regard to body weight was determined. In this study, it was demonstrated that, when SUVmax was lower than 2.2, the contour and extent of the uptake area were vague. Therefore, SUVmax 2.2 was considered negative uptake. The size of tumours (long diameter × short diameter × height) was measured on CT images.

Histopathological typing

Histopathological examinations were performed in 14 of the 16 study patients. In 13 patients specimens were obtained from tissue resected during LNUx and in 1 patient from tissue obtained at autopsy. Histological grades were classified according to the World Health Organization classification [24].

Statistical analysis

Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the survival of the patients with UUT-UC in relation to the presence and location of metastases. The analyses were performed with the log-rank test using SPSS v. 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY). The SUVmax at 10 and 20 min after injection were compared using the paired t-test. A value of p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The profiles of the 16 study patients, and the choline uptake determined as SUVmax and the sizes estimated on CT images of the primary tumours are shown in Table 1. The clinical findings, treatment, and outcomes in the patients, and histopathological findings of the primary tumours are shown in Table 2.
Table 1

Patient profiles and 11C-choline uptake and sizes of primary tumours estimated on PET/CT images

Patient no.

Age (years)

Sex

Primary tumour

Side

Location

11C-Choline uptake (SUVmax)

Size (mm)a

10 min

20 min

1

61

M

Right

Renal pelvis

2.48

3.79

29 × 25 × 20

2

67

F

Right

Renal pelvis

5.52

4.36

37 × 26 × 20

3

50

F

Left

Ureter

2.80

2.94

10 × 9 × 12

4

73

F

Right

Ureter

 <2.2

 <2.2

Indeterminableb

5

56

M

Right

Ureter

 <2.2

 <2.2

15 × 15 × 15b

6

81

M

Right

Renal pelvis

3.83

3.43

19 × 25 × 12

7

83

M

Right

Renal pelvis

2.74

2.83

10 × 9 × 12

8

81

M

Left

Renal pelvis

2.31

3.22

8 × 8 × 15

9

69

F

Left

Renal pelvis

4.06

3.97

23 × 20 × 12

10

75

M

Right

Ureter

2.49

2.18

10 × 9 × 8

11

64

F

Right

Ureter

6.09

6.28

11 × 10 × 8

12

53

M

Right

Renal pelvis

7.85

8.08

46 × 45 × 40

13

56

F

Right

Ureter

3.25

2.64

12 × 11 × 12

14

81

M

Left

Ureter

3.97

3.79

10 × 10 × 10

15

67

F

Right

Ureter

 <2.2

 <2.2

14 × 14 × 50

16

81

M

Right

Ureter

6.59

3.80

25 × 17 × 25

aLong diameter × short diameter × height

bNonmalignancy

Table 2

Clinical findings, treatment, and outcomes in patients and histopathological findings of tumours

Patient no.

TNM classificationa

Treatment

Interval from PET/CT to LNUx (days)

Histopathological findings

Outcome

Days after LNUxb

1

III (T3N0M0)

LNUx

33

UC, G2 > G3 pT3, ly0, v0, n0

NED

1,530

2

IV (T4N2M1)

Inoperable

UC, G3, pT4

Died from cancer

25 (after PET/CT )

3

I (T1N0M0)

LNUx

45

Malignant lymphoma

NED

1,560

4

LNUx

10

No malignancy

NED

699

5

NED

6

0a (T1aN0M0)

LNUx

14

UC, G1, pTa, ly0, n0, v0

Died from cancer

725

7

I (T1N0M0)

LNUx

7

UC, G2, pT1, ly0, n0, v0

NED

1,451

8

I (T1N0M0)

LNUx

13

UC, G2, pT1, ly0, n0, v0

NED

1,426

9

II (T2N0M0)

LNUx

42

UC, G2 = G3, pT2, ly0, v0, n0

NED

1,402

10

I (T1N0M0)

LNUx

45

UC, G2 > G3, pT1, ly0, v0, n0

NED

1,399

11

IV (T2N1M0)

NAC + LNUx + MVAC

4

UC, G2-3, pT2, ly+, v+, n+

NED

1,414

12

IV (T4N0M1)

LNUx + MVAC

65

UC > SCC, G3, pT4

Died from cancer

180

13

LNUx

3

IgG4-related disease

NED

743

14

IV (T3N1M0)

LNUx + (G + CBDCA)

3

UC, G3, pT3, INFβ, ew0, ly0, n0

Died from cancer

600

15c

IV (T4N0M0)

LNUx + NAC

61

UC, G3, pT4, INFβ, ly2, v1,n0

Alive with cancer

592

16

IV (T3N2M1)

Inoperable, G

Alive with cancer

510 (after PET/CT)

LNUx laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy; NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (two cycles) before or after LNUx; NED no evidence of disease

Chemotherapy: MVAC methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (three cycles) after LNUx; G + CBOCA gemcitabine and carboplatin (three cycles) after LNUx; G gemcitabine (three cycles)

aAccording to Sobin et al. [21]

bInterval (days) between LNUx and 14 July or 10 September 2012. If patient died, interval between LNUx and death. In patients who underwent no LNUx, interval between PET/CT and 14 July or 10 September 2012 or deathcMetastases in the sacral lymph nodes and 4th lumber spine were found 380 days after LNUx

cMetastases in the sacral lymph nodes and 4th lumber spine were found 380 days after LNUx

Of the 16 study patients, 13 were choline uptake-positive and the other 3 were uptake-negative in the urothelial lesions (Table 1). In the three choline uptake-negative patients, the SUVmax values were <2.2 at both 10 and 20 min. Except for two inoperable patients and one patient who needed no surgery, all patients underwent LNUx. The specimens obtained by LNUx or autopsy (patient 2) were examined histopathologically, which confirmed that of the 13 choline uptake-positive patients, 11 patients (patients 1, 2, 6 – 12, 14, and 16) had UUT-UC, 1 (patient 3) had malignant lymphoma, and 1 (patient 13) had IgG4-related disease (Table 2). Of the three uptake-negative patients, two (patients 4 and 5) had no malignancies and 1 (patient 15) had UUT-UC (Table 2). Of the 2 patients with no malignancies, one (patient 4) underwent LNUx, and the lesion was confirmed histopathologically to be nonmalignant. The other patient (patient 5) did not undergo LNUx, but no malignancy was diagnosed based on his local and clinical findings. The uptake-negative patient with UUT-UC (patient 15) underwent LNUx and the lesion was confirmed histopathologically to be UUT-UC. Of the 12 patients with UUT-UC, 7 had renal pelvis carcinoma and 5 had ureteral carcinoma (Table 1). In 6 of the 11 choline uptake-positive patients with UUT-UC, the SUVmax at 10 min was higher than at 20 min, and in 5 of these patients the SUVmax at 20 min was higher than at 10 min. There was no statistically significant difference between the SUVmax values of the urothelial lesions at 10 min and those at 20 min.

One patient was false-negative for UUT-UC (patient 15). The other 12 patients with UUT-UC showed choline SUVmax ranging from 2.48 to 7.85 (mean ± SD 4.15 ± 1.73) at 10 min and from 2.83 to 8.08 (3.95 ± 1.54) at 20 min, and a patient with malignant lymphoma in the left ureter (patient 3) also showed choline uptake (SUVmax 2.80 at 10 min and 2.94 at 20 min; Tables 1 and 2). There was incidentally a patient with IgG4-related disease [25, 26] who had a tumorous lesion in the right ureter (patient 13), and the lesion showed weak but definite choline uptake (SUVmax 3.25 at 10 min and 2.64 at 20 min; Tables 1 and 2). The sensitivity of choline PET/CT in the detection of UUT-UC was 92 % (11 of 12 patients). The nonmalignant tumorous ureteral lesion associated with IgG4-related disease with positive uptake was considered false-positive as judged only on the basis of malignancy or nonmalignancy, whereas the other two nonmalignant ureteral lesions in patients 4 and 5 were uptake-negative.

In 5 of the 12 patients with UUT-UC (patients 2, 11, 12, 14 and 16) choline PET/CT also showed definite choline uptake in the sites corresponding to metastases, patients 11 and 14 had metastases only in the regional lymph nodes, and patients 2, 12 and 16 also had distant metastases (Table 3). These metastatic lesions were detected first by choline PET/CT performed in this study. Choline uptake in the metastatic lesions was determined as SUVmax and the size of the lesions was estimated on CT images (Table 3). The SUVmax values in the metastatic lesions were as high as in the primary tumours, ranging from 2.55 to 10.39 (5.75 ± 1.85) at 10 min and from 2.28 to 11.80 (5.45 ± 2.10) at 20 min.

In 10 of 15 choline uptake-positive metastatic lesions, the SUVmax values at 10 min were higher than those at 20 min, in 4 the SUVmax values at 20 min were higher than those at 10 min, and in 1 the SUVmax values at 10 and 20 min were equal. The SUVmax values at 10 min were significantly higher than those at 20 min (p < 0.05). The size of the largest metastatic tumours (41 × 33 × 40 mm, left aortic lymph nodes in patient 16) approximated that of the primary tumour (46 × 45 × 40 mm, right renal pelvis in patient 12). In one inoperable patient (patient 2), metastases were found in the skull, sixth thoracic spine, pelvis, left lung, and the right lower paratracheal and subaortic lymph nodes; in another inoperable patient (patient 16), metastases were found in the left supraclavicular lymph nodes and the left anterior mediastinal lymph nodes as well as in the regional lymph nodes including the left aortic and common iliac lymph nodes (Table 3). The metastatic tumours in the regional and distant lymph nodes were surgically resected (patients 11, 12 and 14) except in two inoperable patients (patients 2 and 16).
Table 3

Properties of metastatic lesions

Patient no.

Location

SUVmax

Size (mm)a

10 min

20 min

2

Right lower paratracheal LN

5.09

4.57

28 × 21 × 14

Subaortic LN

5.39

4.41

17 × 12 × 10

Thoracic spine (VI)

5.10

4.71

17 × 15 × 12

Right iliac bone

9.29

7.60

35 × 33 × 20

Left lung

2.55

2.28

21 × 17 × 16

Skull

5.07

4.40

16 × 13 × 16

11

Right internal iliac LN

4.92

5.22

11 × 10 × 9

12

Right renal hilar LN

4.68

3.57

21 × 10 × 12

Thoracic spine (VI)

6.45

6.01

19 × 16 × 14

Thoracic spine (XII)

7.36

7.55

36 × 30 × 26

Right iliac bone

10.39

11.80

28 × 25 × 16

14

Left sacral LN

4.73

5.15

10 × 10 × 10

16

Left aortic LN

5.07

5.46

41 × 33 × 40

Left common iliac LN

5.85

5.85

30 × 17 × 35

Left supraclavicular LN

5.91

4.73

20 × 10 × 10

Left anterior mediastinal LN

4.16

3.82

10 × 10 × 10

LN lymph node

aLong diameter × short diameter × height

The outcome in all 16 study patients was checked on 14 July or 10 September 2012 (592 – 1,530 days after LNUx; Table 2). The outcomes in patients with distant metastases, with metastases only in the regional lymph nodes, and without metastases are compared in Table 4 and Fig. 1. An inoperable patient (patient 2) died from cancer 25 days after choline PET/CT and another inoperable patient (patient 16) was alive with cancer 510 days after choline PET/CT. Of the other two patients with metastases only in the regional lymph nodes, one (patient 14) died from cancer 600 days after LNUx, and one (patient 11) had no evidence of disease 1,414 days after LNUx. Of seven patients with UUT-UC without metastases, five (patients 1, 7, 8, 9 and 10) had no evidence of disease 1,399 – 1,530 days after LNUx, one (patient 6) died from another cause 725 days after LNUx, and one (patient 15) was alive with cancer 592 days after LNUx, although in this patient metastases in the sacral lymph nodes and fourth lumbar spine were found 380 days after surgery (the footnote relating to patient 15 in Table 2). Patients with malignant lymphoma (patient 3) or with IgG4-related disease (patient 13) had no evidence of disease 1,560 and 743 days after LNUx.
Table 4

Outcomes in patients with distant metastases, with metastases only in regional lymph nodes, and without metastases

Patient group

No. of patients

Surgical treatment

Outcome

Died from cancer

Alive with cancer

No evidence of diseaseg

With distant metastases

2 (patients 2, 16)

No surgery

1b

1e

 

1 (patient 12)

LNUx  + lymphadenectomy

1c

  

With metastases only in regional lymph nodes

2 (patients 11, 14)

LNUx + lymphadenectomy

1d

 

1

Without metastases

6 (patients 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15)a

  

1f

5

LNUx laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy

aSeven patients had no metastases, but one died from another cause and was excluded

bDied from cancer 25 days after PET/CT

cDied from cancer 180 days after LNUx

dDied from cancer 600 days after LNUx

eJudged 510 days after PET/CT

fSee the footnote relating to patient 15 in Table 2

gJudged 743 – 1,530 days after LNUx

Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing survival in patients with distant metastases (three patients), with metastases only in the regional lymph nodes (two patients), and without metastases (six patients). See the footnotes to Tables 2 and 4

PET/CT images of the primary and metastatic tumours and the photographs of the primary tumours after resection in patients 1, 12 and 11 are shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 4.
Fig. 2

Urothelial carcinoma of the left renal pelvis in patient 1. a, b Choline PET/CT images of the primary tumour at 10 min (a) and 20 min (b) after injection. Choline uptake at 10 min is positive but weak (SUVmax 2.48) compared with that at 20 min (SUVmax 3.79). c Photograph of the primary tumour after resection. Circles tumour sites

Fig. 3

Urothelial carcinoma of the right renal pelvis in patient 12. a Choline PET/CT images of the primary tumour at 10 min after injection (SUVmax 7.85). b Photograph of the primary tumour after resection. Circles tumour sites. c, d Choline PET/CT images of the metastatic lesions at the 12th thoracic spine (SUVmax 7.36, c) and the right iliac bone (SUVmax 10.39, d) at 10 min after injection. Arrows bone metastases. e Maximum intensity projection image. The metastatic lesions in the sixth thoracic spine and the right iliac bone are seen (arrows)

Fig. 4

Urothelial carcinoma of the right ureter in patient 11. a Choline PET/CT images of the primary tumour at 10 min after injection (SUVmax 6.09). b Photograph of the primary tumour after resection. Circle tumour site. c Choline PET/CT images of the metastatic lesions at the right internal iliac lymph nodes at 10 min after injection (SUVmax 4.92). d Maximum intensity projection image. Arrows tumour sites. A catheter is inserted into the right ureter (a, d)

Discussion

11C-Choline is a small molecule that after intravenous injection is very quickly integrated into the cell membrane as phosphatidylcholine. It is a marker of membrane metabolism, and is subject to very late urinary excretion, so that the renal pelvis and ureter are free of urinary radioactivity at the time of image acquisition. Nevertheless, there have been no studies so far on the efficacy of choline PET/CT in the detection of the primary tumour and metastases of UUT-UC; this was the principal motive for performing this study.

Of the 16 study patients with suspicion of UUT-UC examined in the present study, in 12 UUT-UC was confirmed. Of the other four, one had malignant lymphoma, one had IgG4-related disease, and two had benign diseases. Of the 12 patients with UUT-TC, 11 (92 %) were choline uptake-positive and the other 1 was false-negative on choline PET/CT. The patient with malignant lymphoma and the patient with IgG4-related disease were uptake-positive, and the two patients with nonmalignant diseases were uptake-negative.

Malignant cells have elevated levels of choline and upregulation of choline kinase activity [27, 28, 29, 30]. Studies have been conducted to evaluate the ability and usefulness of choline PET/CT in detecting cancer within the prostate and in differentiating cancer from normal tissue and/or benign disease [16, 17, 18, 19]. In summary, these studies indicate that the use of choline PET/CT for initial diagnosis and local staging of prostate cancer cannot be recommended as a first-line screening method in men at high risk of prostate cancer [20]. In contrast, there have been a number of studies demonstrating that choline PET/CT is useful in detecting and staging lymph node metastases of prostate cancer [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. In another study evaluating the ability of choline PET to detect bladder cancer before cystectomy, normal bladder showed little uptake, and primary bladder cancer was visualized in 10 of 18 patients with residual invasive disease in the cystectomy specimen [31].

Of the 12 patients with UUT-UC examined in the present study, choline PET/CT revealed distant metastases in three, metastases only in the regional lymph nodes in two, and no metastases in seven. Both distant metastatic lesions and regional lymph node metastases showed definite choline uptake and similar SUVmax to the values in the primary tumours of UUT-UC. According to the diagnostic findings on choline PET/CT, one of three patients with distant metastases and two patients with metastases only in the regional lymph nodes underwent LNUx and lymphadenectomy, and seven patients without metastases underwent LNUx. As shown in Table 4 and Fig. 1, the outcome in patients with UUT-UC corresponded to the patient classification based on the presence or absence of metastases and locoregional or distant metastases. These results suggest that choline PET/CT is useful in staging as well as in the primary diagnosis of UUT-UC.

Choline uptakes determined as SUVmax at 10 min were significantly higher than those at 20 min in metastatic tumours of UUT-UC (p < 0.05), whereas these was no statistically significant difference between the SUVmax values at 10 min and those at 20 min in the primary tumours of UUT-UC. Although the reason for the difference between the primary and metastatic tumours of UUT-UC is not yet known, the finding suggests that choline uptake takes place earlier in metastatic tumours than in primary tumours of UUT-UC. The results indicate that choline uptake should be determined at both 10 and 20 min after injection for the detection of the primary and metastatic tumours of UUT-UC. Because the number of patients assessed in this pilot study was rather small, confirmation of this conclusion must await further follow-up studies with greater numbers of patients.

Besides UUT-UC, the tumours developed in the ureter of a patient with malignant lymphoma and a patient with IgG4-related disease were choline uptake-positive. IgG4-related disease, which is characterized by elevated serum IgG4 concentrations and tumefaction or tissue infiltration with IgG4-positive plasma cells, is an under-recognized condition about which knowledge is now growing rapidly [25, 26]. The present study demonstrated that inflammatory pseudotumour developed in the ureter of a patient with IgG4-related disease and the tumour showed definite choline uptake. To our knowledge there have been no prior reports of definite choline uptake in tumorous lesions associated with IgG4-related disease.

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that choline PET/CT is useful in detecting the primary tumours and metastases of UUT-UC and potentially in providing valuable prognostic information. Besides UUT-UC, the ureteral tumours associated with malignant lymphoma and IgG4-related disease showed definite choline uptake. Follow-up studies with greater numbers of patients are needed to make the conclusions more reliable.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raman JD, Messer J, Sielatycki JA, Hollenbeak CS. Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973–2005. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1059–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schöder H, Larson SM. Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:274–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jana S, Blaufox MD. Nuclear medicine studies of the prostate, testes, and bladder. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:51–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lodde M, Lacombe L, Friede J, Morin F, Saourine A, Fradet Y. Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computed tomography for staging of urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2010;106:658–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kibel AS, Dehdashti F, Katz MD, Klim AP, Grubb RL, Humphrey PA, et al. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4314–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swinnen G, Maes A, Pottel H, Vanneste A, Billiet I, Lesage K, et al. FDG-PET/CT for the preoperative lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;57:641–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scattoni V, Picchio M, Suardi N, Messa C, Freschi M, Roscigno M, et al. Detection of lymph-node metastases with integrated [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with PSA failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results confirmed by open pelvic-retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:423–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schilling D, Schlemmer HP, Wagner PH, Böttcher P, Merseburger AS, Aschoff P, et al. Histological verification of 11C-choline-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;102:446–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winter A, Uphoff J, Henke RP, Wawroschek F. First results of [11C] choline PET/CT-guided secondary lymph node surgery in patients with PSA failure and single lymph node recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2010;84:418–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giovacchini G, Picchio M, Briganti A, Cozzarini C, Scattoni V, Salonia A, et al. [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging. J Urol. 2010;184:938–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Budiharto T, Joniau S, Lerut E, Van den Bergh L, Mottaghy F, Deroose CM, et al. Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases. Eur Urol. 2011;60:125–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Contractor K, Challapalli A, Barwick T, Winkler M, Hellawell G, Hazell S, et al. Use of [11C]choline PET-CT as a noninvasive method for detecting pelvic lymph node status from prostate cancer and relationship with choline kinase expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7673–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rigatti P, Suardi N, Briganti A, Da Pozzo LF, Tutolo M, Villa L, et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2011;60:935–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martini T, Mayr R, Trenti E, Palermo S, Comploj E, Pycha A, et al. The role of C-choline-PET/CT-guided secondary lymphadenectomy in patients with PSA failure after radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from eight cases. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:601572.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farsad M, Schiavina R, Castellucci P, Nanni C, Corti B, Martorana G, et al. Detection and localization of prostate cancer: correlation of (11)C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1642–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reske SN, Blumstein NM, Neumaier B, Gottfried HW, Finsterbusch F, Kocot D, et al. Imaging prostate cancer with 11C-choline PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1249–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martorana G, Schiavina R, Corti B, Farsad M, Salizzoni E, Brunocilla E, et al. 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor localization of primary prostate cancer in comparison with 12-core biopsy. J Urol. 2006;176:954–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Testa C, Schiavina R, Lodi R, Salizzoni E, Corti B, Farsad M, et al. Prostate cancer: sextant localization with MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and 11C-choline PET/CT. Radiology. 2007;244:797–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuccio C, Rubello D, Castellucci P, Marzola MC, Fanti S. Choline PET/CT for prostate cancer: main clinical applications. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e50–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. Urological tumors. 7 ed revised. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 258–61Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scosyrev E, Messing EM, van Wijngaarden E, Peterson DR, Sahasrabudhe D, Golijanin D, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder. Cancer. 2012;118:72–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenblatt R, Sherif A, Rintala E, Wahlqvist R, Ullén A, Nilsson S, et al. Pathologic downstaging is a surrogate marker for efficacy and increased survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1229–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suter G, Algava F, Amin MB, Busch C, Cheville J, Gasser T, et al. Tumors of the urinary system. In: Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. p. 110–23.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khosroshahi A, Stone JH. A clinical overview of IgG4-related systemic disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:57–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, Kawano M, Yamamoto M, Saeki T, et al. A novel clinical entity, IgG4-related disease (IgG4RD): general concept and details. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:1–14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Macara IG. Elevated phosphocholine concentration in ras-transformed NIH 3 T3 cells arises from increased choline kinase activity, not from phosphatidylcholine breakdown. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:325–8.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ratnam S, Kent C. Early increase in choline kinase activity upon induction of the H-ras oncogene in mouse fibroblast cell lines. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;323:313–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katz-Brull R, Degani H. Kinetics of choline transport and phosphorylation in human breast cancer cells; NMR application of the zero trans method. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:1375–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ackerstaff E, Pflug BR, Nelson JB, Bhujwalla ZM. Detection of increased choline compounds with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy subsequent to malignant transformation of human prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3599–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, Jongen MM, Mensink HJ, Vaalburg W. Visualisation of bladder cancer using (11)C-choline PET: first clinical experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1283–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naoto Sassa
    • 1
  • Katsuhiko Kato
    • 2
  • Shinji Abe
    • 3
  • Shingo Iwano
    • 4
  • Shinji Ito
    • 4
  • Mitsuru Ikeda
    • 2
  • Kazuhiro Shimamoto
    • 2
  • Seiichi Yamamoto
    • 2
  • Tokunori Yamamoto
    • 1
  • Momokazu Gotoh
    • 1
  • Shinji Naganawa
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of UrologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory SciencesNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Radiological TechnologyNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations