Advertisement

Radioimmunotherapy with Tenarad, a 131I-labelled antibody fragment targeting the extra-domain A1 of tenascin-C, in patients with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma

  • Luigi AlojEmail author
  • Laura D’Ambrosio
  • Michela Aurilio
  • Anna Morisco
  • Ferdinando Frigeri
  • Corradina Caraco’
  • Francesca Di Gennaro
  • Gaetana Capobianco
  • Leonardo Giovannoni
  • Hans D. Menssen
  • Dario Neri
  • Antonio Pinto
  • Secondo Lastoria
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The extra-domain A1 of tenascin-C (TC-A1) is highly expressed in the extracellular matrix of tumours and on newly formed blood vessels and is thus a valuable target for radionuclide therapy. Tenarad is a fully human miniantibody or small immunoprotein (SIP, molecular weight 80 kDa) labelled with 131I that is derived from a TC-A1-binding antibody. Previous phase I/II studies with a similar compound (131I-L19SIP) used for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) have shown preliminary efficacy in a variety of cancer types. In this ongoing phase I/II trial, Tenarad was administered to patients with recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) refractory to conventional treatments.

Methods

Eight patients (four men, four women; age range 19 – 41) were enrolled between April 2010 and March 2011. All patients had received a median of three previous lines of chemotherapy (range three to six) and seven had also undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or bone marrow transplantation. In addition, seven patients received external beam radiation. All patients had nodal disease, constitutional B symptoms and some showed extranodal disease in skeletal bone (four patients), lung (three), liver (two) and spleen (one). Baseline assessments included whole-body FDG PET with contrast-enhanced CT and diagnostic Tenarad planar and SPECT studies. Patients were considered eligible to receive a therapeutic dose of Tenarad (2.05 GBq/m2) if tumour uptake was more than four times higher than that of muscle.

Results

All patients were eligible and received the therapeutic dose of Tenarad. Only one patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leucocytopenia, requiring hospitalization and therapeutic intervention. All other patients had haematological toxicity of grade 3 or lower, which resolved spontaneously. At the first response assessment (4 – 6 weeks after therapy), one patient showed a complete response, one showed a partial response (PR) and five had disease stabilization (SD). Five patients were given up to three repeated Tenarad treatments. One patient showed SD which then improved to a PR, three showed clinical benefit while maintaining SD and one patient showed disease progression.

Conclusion

Tenarad RIT is effective in chemorefractory HL and resulted in objective responses or clinical benefit in the majority of patients. Toxicity was acceptable despite the high load of prior treatments, previous ASCT and multiple Tenarad administrations. Further studies are planned to define the most effective schedule for this type of RIT in HL patients.

Keywords

Hodgkin's lymphoma Radioimmunotherapy Dosimetry 131Tenascin-C 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Philogen SpA sponsored this work under a protocol approved by the internal review board of our institution.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors from the Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione “G. Pascale”, Napoli, Italy, received compensation for this study and none declare conflicts of interest. The remaining authors (D.N., L.G. and H.D.M.) are shareholders or employees of the protocol sponsor, Philogen SpA.

References

  1. 1.
    Bauer K, Skoetz N, Monsef I, Engert A, Brillant C. Comparison of chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for patients with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:(8):CD007941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007941.pub2
  2. 2.
    Kuruvilla J, Keating A, Crump M. How I treat relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2011;117:4208–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uhm J, Kuruvilla J. Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Rev. 2012;26:167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brice P. Managing relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2008;141:3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horning S, Fanale M, deVos S, Borchmann P, Illidge T, Engert A, et al. Defining a population of Hodgkin lymphoma patients for novel therapeutics: an international effort [abstract 118]. Ann Oncol. 2008;19 Suppl 4:120–1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Younes A. Novel treatment strategies for patients with relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:507–19. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.507
  7. 7.
    Illidge T, Morschhauser F. Radioimmunotherapy in follicular lymphoma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011;24:279–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaminski MS, Tuck M, Estes J, Kolstad A, Ross CW, Zasadny K, et al. 131I-tositumomab therapy as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:441–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scholz CW, Pinto A, Linkesch W, Linden O, Viardot A, Keller U, et al. (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab-tiuxetan as first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma: 30 months of follow-up data from an international multicenter phase II clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:308–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silacci M, Brack S, Schirru G, Marlind J, Ettorre A, Merlo A, et al. Design, construction, and characterization of a large synthetic human antibody phage display library. Proteomics. 2005;5:2340–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brack SS, Silacci M, Birchler M, Neri D. Tumor-targeting properties of novel antibodies specific to the large isoform of tenascin-C. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3200–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borsi L, Carnemolla B, Nicolo G, Spina B, Tanara G, Zardi L. Expression of different tenascin isoforms in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human breast tissues. Int J Cancer. 1992;52:688–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berndorff D, Borkowski S, Sieger S, Rother A, Friebe M, Viti F, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors by targeting extra domain B fibronectin: identification of the best-suited radioimmunoconjugate. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7053s–63s.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pini A, Viti F, Santucci A, Carnemolla B, Zardi L, Neri P, et al. Design and use of a phage display library. Human antibodies with subnanomolar affinity against a marker of angiogenesis eluted from a two-dimensional gel. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:21769–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tijink BM, Neri D, Leemans CR, Budde M, Dinkelborg LM, Stigter-van Walsum M, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of head and neck cancer xenografts using 131I-labeled antibody L19-SIP for selective targeting of tumor vasculature. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1127–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erba PA, Sollini M, Orciuolo E, Traino C, Petrini M, Paganelli G, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with radretumab in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:922–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauer S, Erba PA, Petrini M, Menrad A, Giovannoni L, Grana C, et al. Expression of the oncofetal ED-B-containing fibronectin isoform in hematologic tumors enables ED-B-targeted 131I-L19SIP radioimmunotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Blood. 2009;113:2265–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heuveling DA, de Bree R, Vugts DJ, Huisman MC, Giovannoni L, Hoekstra OS, et al. Phase 0 microdosing PET study using the human mini antibody F16SIP in head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aldinucci D, Gloghini A, Pinto A, De Filippi R, Carbone A. The classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma microenvironment and its role in promoting tumour growth and immune escape. J Pathol. 2010;221:248–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steidl C, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD. Molecular pathogenesis of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: increasing evidence of the importance of the microenvironment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1812–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oki Y, Younes A. Does rituximab have a place in treating classic Hodgkin lymphoma? Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2010;5:135–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soini Y, Alavaikko M, Lehto VP, Virtanen I. Tenascin in reactive lymph nodes and in malignant lymphomas. Pathol Res Pract. 1992;188:1078–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Younes A, Oki Y, McLaughlin P, Copeland AR, Goy A, Pro B, et al. Phase 2 study of rituximab plus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2012;119:4123–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Younes A, Romaguera J, Hagemeister F, McLaughlin P, Rodriguez MA, Fiumara P, et al. A pilot study of rituximab in patients with recurrent, classic Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2003;98:310–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khnykin D, Troen G, Berner JM, Delabie J. The expression of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Pathol. 2006;208:431–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wallentine JC, Kim KK, Seiler 3rd CE, Vaughn CP, Crockett DK, Tripp SR, et al. Comprehensive identification of proteins in Hodgkin lymphoma-derived Reed-Sternberg cells by LC-MS/MS. Lab Invest. 2007;87:1113–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aloj L, D’Ambrosio L, Aurilio M, Marreno R, Menssen HD, Giovannoni L, et al. Preliminary evaluation of radioimmunotherapy with Tenarad, a I-131 labeled antibody fragment targeting the extra-domain A1 of tenascin-C, in patients with refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts. Vol 29, No. 15 suppl, 8063; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Siegel JA, Thomas SR, Stubbs JB, Stabin MG, Hays MT, Koral KF, et al. MIRD pamphlet no. 16: Techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:37S–61S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buijs WC, Siegel JA, Boerman OC, Corstens FH. Absolute organ activity estimated by five different methods of background correction. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2167–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sgouros G. Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:689–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Traino AC, Ferrari M, Cremonesi M, Stabin MG. Influence of total-body mass on the scaling of S-factors for patient-specific, blood-based red-marrow dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:5231–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Folkman J. The role of angiogenesis in tumor growth. Semin Cancer Biol. 1992;3:65–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Birgersdotter A, Baumforth KR, Porwit A, Sjoberg J, Wei W, Bjorkholm M, et al. Inflammation and tissue repair markers distinguish the nodular sclerosis and mixed cellularity subtypes of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1393–401.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Birgersdotter A, Baumforth KR, Wei W, Murray PG, Sjoberg J, Bjorkholm M, et al. Connective tissue growth factor is expressed in malignant cells of Hodgkin lymphoma but not in other mature B-cell lymphomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:271–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buglio D, Georgakis G, Younes A. Novel small-molecule therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7:735–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jona A, Younes A. Novel treatment strategies for patients with relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Rev. 2010;24:233–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kwekkeboom DJ, de Herder WW, Kam BL, van Eijck CH, van Essen M, Kooij PP, et al. Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177 Lu-DOTA 0, Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2124–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Aloj
    • 5
    Email author
  • Laura D’Ambrosio
    • 1
  • Michela Aurilio
    • 1
  • Anna Morisco
    • 1
  • Ferdinando Frigeri
    • 2
  • Corradina Caraco’
    • 1
  • Francesca Di Gennaro
    • 1
  • Gaetana Capobianco
    • 2
  • Leonardo Giovannoni
    • 3
  • Hans D. Menssen
    • 3
  • Dario Neri
    • 4
  • Antonio Pinto
    • 2
  • Secondo Lastoria
    • 1
  1. 1.Struttura Complessa Medicina NucleareIstituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale” - IRCCSNapoliItaly
  2. 2.Struttura Complessa di Ematologia OncologicaIstituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale” - IRCCSNapoliItaly
  3. 3.Philogen, SpASienaItaly
  4. 4.Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETHZurichSwitzerland
  5. 5.Struttura Complessa di Medicina NucleareIstituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale” - IRCCSNapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations