High-resolution imaging of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion with 68Ga-VQ respiratory gated (4-D) PET/CT

  • Jason Callahan
  • Michael S. Hofman
  • Shankar Siva
  • Tomas Kron
  • Michal E. Schneider
  • David Binns
  • Peter Eu
  • Rodney J. Hicks
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Our group has previously reported on the use of 68Ga-ventilation/perfusion (VQ) PET/CT scanning for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We describe here the acquisition methodology for 68Ga-VQ respiratory gated (4-D) PET/CT and the effects of respiratory motion on image coregistration in VQ scanning.

Methods

A prospective study was performed in 15 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. 4-D PET and 4-D CT images were acquired using an infrared marker on the patient’s abdomen as a surrogate for breathing motion following inhalation of Galligas and intravenous administration of 68Ga-macroaggregated albumin. Images were reconstructed with phase-matched attenuation correction. The lungs were contoured on CT and PET VQ images during free-breathing (FB) and at maximum inspiration (Insp) and expiration (Exp). The similarity between PET and CT volumes was measured using the Dice coefficient (DC) comparing the following groups; (1) FB-PET/CT, (2) InspPET/InspCT, (3) ExpPET/Exp CT, and (4) FB-PET/AveCT. A repeated measures one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison Tukey tests were performed to evaluate any difference between the groups. Diaphragmatic motion in the superior–inferior direction on the 4-D CT scan was also measured.

Results

4-D VQ scanning was successful in all patients without additional acquisition time compared to the nongated technique. The highest volume overlap was between ExpPET and ExpCT and between FB-PET and AveCT with a DC of 0.82 and 0.80 for ventilation and perfusion, respectively. This was significantly better than the DC comparing the other groups (0.78–0.79, p < 0.05). These values agreed with a visual inspection of the images with improved image coregistration around the lung bases. The diaphragmatic motion during the 4-D CT scan was highly variable with a range of 0.4–3.4 cm (SD 0.81 cm) in the right lung and 0–2.8 cm (SD 0.83 cm) in the left lung. Right-sided diaphragmatic nerve palsy was observed in 3 of 15 patients.

Conclusion

68Ga-VQ 4-D PET/CT is feasible and the blurring caused by respiratory motion is well corrected with 4-D acquisition, which principally reduces artefact at the lung bases. The images with the highest spatial overlap were the combined expiration phase or FB PET and average CT. With higher resolution than SPECT/CT, the PET/CT technique has a broad range of potential clinical applications including diagnostic algorithms for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, preoperative evaluation of regional lung function and improving assessment or understanding of pulmonary physiology in the vast range of pulmonary diseases.

Keywords

68Ga-ventilation/perfusion PET/CT Respiratory gated PET/CT Pulmonary embolism Respiratory motion 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 12915 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wagner Jr HN, Sabiston Jr DC, Iio M, McAfee JG, Meyer JK, Langan JK. Regional pulmonary blood flow in man by radioisotope scanning. JAMA. 1964;187:601–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leblanc M, Leveillee F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of VQ SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(8):667–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jogi J, Jonson B, Ekberg M, Bajc M. Ventilation-perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-DTPA versus technegas: a head-to-head study in obstructive and nonobstructive disease. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(5):735–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roach PJ, Gradinscak DJ, Schembri GP, Bailey EA, Willowson KP, Bailey DL. SPECT/CT in VQ scanning. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40(6):455–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hofman MS, Kong G, Neels OC, Eu P, Hong E, Hicks RJ. High management impact of Ga-68 DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine and other somatostatin expressing tumours. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(1):40–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchmann I, Henze M, Engelbrecht S, Eisenhut M, Runz A, Schäfer M, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111In-DTPAOC (Octreoscan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(10):1617–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hicks RJ, Hofman MS. Is there still a role for SPECT-CT in oncology in the PET-CT era? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(12):712–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kotzerke J, Andreeff M, Wunderlich G. PET aerosol lung scintigraphy using Galligas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(1):175–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathias CJ, Green MA. A convenient route to [68Ga]Ga-MAA for use as a particulate PET perfusion tracer. Appl Radiat Isot. 2008;66(12):1910–2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kotzerke J, Andreeff M, Wunderlich G, Wiggermann P, Zophel K. Ventilation-perfusion-lungscintigraphy using PET and 68Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Nuklearmedizin. 2010;49(6):203–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofman MS, Beauregard JM, Barber TW, Neels OC, Eu P, Hicks RJ. 68Ga PET/CT ventilation-perfusion imaging for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study with comparison to conventional scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(10):1513–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26(3):297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suga K, Yasuhiko K, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Seto A, Matsumoto T, et al. Assessment of regional lung functional impairment with co-registered respiratory-gated ventilation/perfusion SPET-CT images: initial experiences. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(2):240–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Yorke E, et al. Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax. Med Phys. 2004;31(12):3179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Callahan J, Kron T, Schneider-Kolsky M, Dunn L, Thompson M, Siva S, et al. Validation of a 4D-PET maximum intensity projection for delineation of an internal target volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(4):749–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li G, Citrin D, Camphausen K, Mueller B, Burman C, Mychalczak B, et al. Advances in 4D medical imaging and 4D radiation therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008;7(1):67–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dinkel J, Hintze C, Tetzlaff R, Huber PE, Herfarth K, Debus J, et al. 4D-MRI analysis of lung tumor motion in patients with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91(3):449–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nyeng TB, Kallehauge JF, Hoyer M, Petersen JB, Poulsen PR, Muren LP. Clinical validation of a 4D-CT based method for lung ventilation measurement in phantoms and patients. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(6):897–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto T, Kabus S, von Berg J, Lorenz C, Keall PJ. Impact of four-dimensional computed tomography pulmonary ventilation imaging-based functional avoidance for lung cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(1):279–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hill RP. Radiation effects on the respiratory system. BJR Suppl. 2005;27:75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cui G, Gopalan S, Yamamoto T, Berger J, Maxim PG, Keall PJ. Commissioning and quality assurance for a respiratory training system based on audiovisual biofeedback. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(4):3262.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Callahan
    • 1
  • Michael S. Hofman
    • 2
  • Shankar Siva
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tomas Kron
    • 4
    • 5
  • Michal E. Schneider
    • 6
  • David Binns
    • 7
  • Peter Eu
    • 7
  • Rodney J. Hicks
    • 8
  1. 1.Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreCentre for Molecular ImagingEast MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Centre for Molecular ImagingThe University of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical SciencesThe University of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation ScienceMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  7. 7.Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Centre for Cancer ImagingEast MelbourneAustralia
  8. 8.Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Centre for Molecular ImagingThe University of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations