Comparative evaluation of CT-based and respiratory-gated PET/CT-based planning target volume (PTV) in the definition of radiation treatment planning in lung cancer: preliminary results
- 594 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare planning target volume (PTV) defined on respiratory-gated positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (RG-PET/CT) to PTV based on ungated free-breathing CT and to evaluate if RG-PET/CT can be useful to personalize PTV by tailoring the target volume to the lesion motion in lung cancer patients.
Thirteen lung cancer patients (six men, mean age 70.0 years, 1 small cell lung cancer, 12 non-small cell lung cancer) who were candidates for radiation therapy were prospectively enrolled and submitted to RG-PET/CT. Ungated free-breathing CT images obtained during a PET/CT study were visually contoured by the radiation oncologist to define standard clinical target volumes (CTV1). Standard PTV (PTV1) resulted from CTV1 with the addition of 1-cm expansion of margins in all directions. RG-PET/CT images were contoured by the nuclear medicine physician and radiation oncologist according to a standardized institutional protocol for contouring gated images. Each CT and PET image of the patient’s respiratory cycle phases was contoured to obtain the RG-CT-based CTV (CTV2) and the RG-PET/CT-based CTV (CTV3), respectively. RG-CT-based and RG-PET/CT-based PTV (PTV2 and PTV3, respectively) were then derived from gated CTVs with a margin expansion of 7–8 mm in head to feet direction and 5 mm in anterior to posterior and left to right direction. The portions of gated PTV2 and PTV3 geometrically not encompassed in PTV1 (PTV2 out PTV1 and PTV3 out PTV1) were also calculated.
Mean ± SD CTV1, CTV2 and CTV3 were 30.5 ± 33.2, 43.1 ± 43.2 and 44.8 ± 45.2 ml, respectively. CTV1 was significantly smaller than CTV2 and CTV3 (p = 0.017 and 0.009 with Student’s t test, respectively). No significant difference was found between CTV2 and CTV3. Mean ± SD of PTV1, PTV2 and PTV3 were 118.7 ± 94.1, 93.8 ± 80.2 and 97.0 ± 83.9 ml, respectively. PTV1 was significantly larger than PTV2 and PTV3 (p = 0.038 and 0.043 with Student’s t test, respectively). No significant difference was found between PTV2 and PTV3. Mean ± SD values of PTV2 out PTV1 and PTV3 out PTV1 were 12.8 ± 25.4 and 14.3 ± 25.9 ml, respectively. The percentage values of PTV2 out PTV1 and PTV3 out PTV1 were not lower than 10 % of PTV1 in 6/13 cases (46.2 %) and than 20 % in 3/13 cases (23.1 %).
Our preliminary data showed that RG-PET/CT in lung cancer can affect not only the volume of PTV but also its shape, as demonstrated by the assessment of gated PTVs outside standard PTV. The use of a gating technique is thus crucial for better delineating PTV by tailoring the target volume to the lesion motion in lung cancer patients.
KeywordsRespiratory-gated PET/CT Radiation treatment planning Planning target volume Clinical target volume Lung cancer
Conflicts of interest
- 2.Mah K, Caldwell CB, Ung YC, Danjoux CE, Balogh JM, Ganguli SN, et al. The impact of (18)FDG-PET on target and critical organs in CT-based treatment planning of patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52(2):339–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bowen SR, Nyflot MJ, Gensheimer M, Hendrickson KR, Kinahan PE, Sandison GA, et al. Challenges and opportunities in patient-specific, motion-managed and PET/CT-guided radiation therapy of lung cancer: review and perspective. Clin Transl Med 2012;1(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-1-18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Guckenberger M, Wilbert J, Krieger T, Richter A, Baier K, Flentje M. Mid-ventilation concept for mobile pulmonary tumors: internal tumor trajectory versus selective reconstruction of four-dimensional computed tomography frames based on external breathing motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74(2):602–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hof H, Rhein B, Haering P, Kopp-Schneider A, Debus J, Herfarth K. 4D-CT-based target volume definition in stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumours: comparison with a conventional technique using individual margins. Radiother Oncol 2009;93(3):419–23. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wolthaus JW, Schneider C, Sonke JJ, van Herk M, Belderbos JS, Rossi MM, et al. Mid-ventilation CT scan construction from four-dimensional respiration-correlated CT scans for radiotherapy planning of lung cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65(5):1560–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wolthaus JW, Sonke JJ, van Herk M, Belderbos JS, Rossi MM, Lebesque JV, et al. Comparison of different strategies to use four-dimensional computed tomography in treatment planning for lung cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70(4):1229–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U, Hurkmans CW, Le Péchoux C, Price A, et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(36):5301–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Liu HH, Balter P, Tutt T, Choi B, Zhang J, Wang C, et al. Assessing respiration-induced tumor motion and internal target volume using four-dimensional computed tomography for radiotherapy of lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68(2):531–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Korreman S, Persson G, Nygaard D, Brink C, Juhler-Nøttrup T. Respiration-correlated image guidance is the most important radiotherapy motion management strategy for most lung cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83(4):1338–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.García Vicente AM, Soriano Castrejón AM, Talavera Rubio MP, León Martín AA, Palomar Muñoz AM, Pilkington Woll JP, et al. 18F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications. Ann Nucl Med 2010;24(3):207–14. doi: 10.1007/s12149-010-0345-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Guerra L, De Ponti E, Elisei F, Bettinardi V, Landoni C, Picchio M, et al. Respiratory gated PET/CT in a European multicentre retrospective study: added diagnostic value in detection and characterization of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39(9):1381–90. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2148-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. In: ICRU Report 62. J. ICRU. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- 37.Bayne M, Hicks RJ, Everitt S, Fimmell N, Ball D, Reynolds J, et al. Reproducibility of “intelligent” contouring of gross tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77(4):1151–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar