Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in 514 SPECT MPI patients with and without coronary artery disease and submaximal exercise heart rate response
- 477 Downloads
The safety of regadenoson (Reg) during low-level exercise testing has been established. However, its administration at peak exercise for patients who do not reach target heart rate (THR) on standard exercise treadmill stress testing (ETT) needs to be established, particularly among patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD)
From our stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) database, we identified all patients between 2009 and 2012 who underwent standard ETT and received Reg at peak exercise for failure to reach THR. Hemodynamics, side effects, and adverse events were entered prospectively into the database at the time of testing and were subsequently retrieved for analysis.
There were 514 patients, mean age 60 ± 12 years, 34 % female gender, and 51 % with prior CAD. There were 218 (42 %) and 297 (57 %) patients who underwent standard or modified Bruce and Cornell protocols, respectively, and with a mean exercise time of 5.8 ± 2.1 min. The mean percentage of peak heart rate achieved was 71 ± 8 %, and mean maximal metabolic equivalent (MET) was 6.7 ± 1.8. There were 63 (12 %) patients who developed ≥30 mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 2 min of Reg administration, and 10 (2 %) had SBP <100 mmHg at 2 min and were younger and achieved higher METs; 8 and 2 patients were symptomatic, respectively. The most common side effects reported were shortness of breath (12 %), chest pain/discomfort (13 %), and dizziness (7 %). There was one syncopal event, but no high-degree heart block, cardiac or respiratory arrest. Four patients received aminophylline. Women were more likely to have shortness of breath or gastrointestinal symptoms, while diabetics were less likely to have chest discomfort. There was otherwise no significant difference in adverse events between different groups including those with and without CAD.
Among patients undergoing standard treadmill stress testing for MPI who do not reach THR, the administration of Reg at peak exercise is safe and without major adverse events. Future large prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the off-label use of Reg in this setting.
KeywordsRegadenoson Exercise stress testing Safety
Conflicts of interest
The study received no funding. We will be discussing off-label use of regadenoson at peak exercise stress testing. Dr. Manuel Cerquiera is a consultant and a speaker on the Bureau of Astellas®.
- 6.Verzijlbergen JF, Vermeersch PH, Laarman GJ, Ascoop CA. Inadequate exercise leads to suboptimal imaging. Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging after dipyridamole combined with low-level exercise unmasks ischemia in symptomatic patients with non-diagnostic thallium-201 scans who exercise submaximally. J Nucl Med 1991;32:2071–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Manganelli F, Spadafora M, Varrella P, Peluso G, Sauro R, Di Lorenzo E, et al. Addition of atropine to submaximal exercise stress testing in patients evaluated for suspected ischaemia with SPECT imaging: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Leaker BR, O’Connor B, Hansel TT, Barnes PJ, Meng L, Mathur VS, et al. Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:329–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Husain Z, Palani G, Cabrera R, Karthikeyan AS, Dhanalakota S, Pathmanathan S, et al. Hemodynamic response, arrhythmic risk, and overall safety of Regadenoson as a pharmacologic stress agent for myocardial perfusion imaging in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1841–9.Google Scholar
- 12.Thomas GS, Tammelin BR, Schiffman GL, Marquez R, Rice DL, Milikien D, et al. Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial). J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:319–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Thomas GS, Thompson RC, Miyamoto MI, Ip TK, Rice DL, Milikien D, et al. The RegEx trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled pilot study combining regadenoson, a selective A(2A) adenosine agonist, with low-level exercise, in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Partington SL, Lanka V, Hainer J, Blankstein R, Skali H, Forman DE, et al. Safety and feasibility of regadenoson use for suboptimal heart rate response during symptom-limited standard Bruce exercise stress test. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:970–8.Google Scholar
- 19.AlJaroudi W, Jaber WA, Grimm R, Marwick T, Cerqueira M. Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1385–94.Google Scholar
- 21.Cerqueira MD, Nguyen P, Staehr P, Underwood SR, Iskandrian AE, ADVANCE-MPI Trial Investigators. Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:307–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar