Advertisement

PET imaging of early response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD4190

  • Min Yang
  • Haokao Gao
  • Yongjun Yan
  • Xilin Sun
  • Kai Chen
  • Qimeng Quan
  • Lixin Lang
  • Dale Kiesewetter
  • Gang NiuEmail author
  • Xiaoyuan ChenEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated noninvasive positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for monitoring tumor response to the VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor ZD4190 during cancer therapy.

Experimental design

Orthotopic MDA-MB-435 tumor-bearing mice were treated with ZD4190 (100 mg/kg orally per day for three consecutive days). Tumor growth was monitored by caliper measurement. During the therapeutic period, longitudinal PET scans were acquired using 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT and 18F-FPPRGD2 as imaging tracers to evaluate tumor glucose metabolism, tumor cell proliferation, and angiogenesis, respectively. Imaging metrics were validated by immunohistochemical analysis of Ki67, GLUT-1, F4/80, CD31, murine integrin β3, and human integrin αvβ3.

Results

Three consecutive daily oral administrations of 100 mg/kg of ZD4190 were effective in delaying MDA-MB-435 tumor growth. A significant difference in tumor volume was observed on day 7 between the treatment group and the control group (p < 0.01). After the final treatment, tumor growth resumed after a short delay. In the control tumors, 18F-FPPRGD2 uptake was stable between days 0 and 7. In ZD4190-treated tumors, 18F-FPPRGD2 uptake had decreased significantly relative to baseline by 26.74±8.12% (p < 0.05) on day 1 and by 41.19±6.63% (p < 0.01) on day 3, then had returned to baseline on day 7. Tumor uptake of 18F-FLT had also decreased on both day 1 and day 3 after initiation of ZD4190 treatment. No significant change in 18F-FDG uptake in ZD4190-treated tumors was observed, however, compared with the control group. All of the imaging findings were supported by ex vivo analysis of related biomarkers.

Conclusion

The longitudinal imaging results demonstrated the usefulness of quantitative 18F-FLT and 18F-FPPRGD2 PET imaging in evaluating the early antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects of ZD4190. The quantification data from the PET imaging were consistent with the pattern of initial growth inhibition with treatment, followed by tumor relapse after treatment cessation.

Keywords

Positron emission tomography (PET) Antiangiogenic treatment 18F-FDG 18F-FLT 18F-FPPRGD2 Integrin Therapy response Tyrosine kinase inhibitor 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by the Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the International Cooperative Program of the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81028009). M.Y. is partly supported by the Outstanding Professionals Foundation of the Jiangsu Health Bureau (grant no. RC2007096). G.N. is currently an Imaging Sciences Training Program (ISTP) Fellow jointly supported by the Radiology and Imaging Sciences Department, NIH Clinical Center and the IRP/NIBIB, NIH. We acknowledge the NIH/CC cyclotron facility for isotope production and Dr. Henry S. Eden for proofreading the manuscript.

Supplementary material

259_2011_1742_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.5 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 1517 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrara N. VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:795–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun J, Wang DA, Jain RK, Carie A, Paquette S, Ennis E, et al. Inhibiting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by a synthetic molecule that blocks binding of both VEGF and PDGF to their receptors. Oncogene. 2005;24:4701–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watanabe H, Mamelak AJ, Wang B, Howell BG, Freed I, Esche C, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (Flk-1/KDR) antibody suppresses contact hypersensitivity. Exp Dermatol. 2004;13:671–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prewett M, Huber J, Li Y, Santiago A, O'Connor W, King K, et al. Antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor (fetal liver kinase 1) monoclonal antibody inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth of several mouse and human tumors. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5209–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciardiello F, Caputo R, Damiano V, Troiani T, Vitagliano D, Carlomagno F, et al. Antitumor effects of ZD6474, a small molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with additional activity against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1546–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wedge SR, Ogilvie DJ, Dukes M, Kendrew J, Curwen JO, Hennequin LF, et al. ZD4190: an orally active inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling with broad-spectrum antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res. 2000;60:970–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drevs J, Hofmann I, Hugenschmidt H, Wittig C, Madjar H, Muller M, et al. Effects of PTK787/ZK 222584, a specific inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, on primary tumor, metastasis, vessel density, and blood flow in a murine renal cell carcinoma model. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4819–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faivre S, Djelloul S, Raymond E. New paradigms in anticancer therapy: targeting multiple signaling pathways with kinase inhibitors. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:407–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen QD, Rodrigues S, Rodrigue CM, Rivat C, Grijelmo C, Bruyneel E, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF165 and semaphorin 3A-mediated cellular invasion and tumor growth by the VEGF signaling inhibitor ZD4190 in human colon cancer cells and xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2070–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaffe CC. Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michalski MH, Chen X. Molecular imaging in cancer treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:358–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, Munn LL, Tong RT, et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat Med. 2004;10:145–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujio Y, Walsh K. Akt mediates cytoprotection of endothelial cells by vascular endothelial growth factor in an anchorage-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:16349–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J. Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:883–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoekstra CJ, Stroobants SG, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Vansteenkiste JF, Lammertsma AA. Measurement of perfusion in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer using H2 15O and positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2109–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes MS, Marsh JN, Zhang H, Woodson AK, Allen JS, Lacy EK, et al. Characterization of digital waveforms using thermodynamic analogs: detection of contrast-targeted tissue in vivo. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006;53:1609–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Padhani AR. MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:S60–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tozer GM. Measuring tumour vascular response to antivascular and antiangiogenic drugs. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:S23–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niu G, Chen X. Vascular endothelial growth factor as an anti-angiogenic target for cancer therapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:1000–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sherley JL, Kelly TJ. Regulation of human thymidine kinase during the cell cycle. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:8350–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eliceiri BP, Cheresh DA. The role of αv integrins during angiogenesis: insights into potential mechanisms of action and clinical development. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1227–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedlander M, Theesfeld CL, Sugita M, Fruttiger M, Thomas MA, Chang S, et al. Involvement of integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 in ocular neovascular diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:9764–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beer AJ, Haubner R, Wolf I, Goebel M, Luderschmidt S, Niemeyer M, et al. PET-based human dosimetry of 18F-galacto-RGD, a new radiotracer for imaging αvβ3 expression. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:763–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenny LM, Coombes RC, Oulie I, Contractor KB, Miller M, Spinks TJ, et al. Phase I trial of the positron-emitting Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide radioligand 18F-AH111585 in breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:879–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hennequin LF, Thomas AP, Johnstone C, Stokes ES, Ple PA, Lohmann JJ, et al. Design and structure-activity relationship of a new class of potent VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 1999;42:5369–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Chi DY, Kil HS, Kim EN, Ryu JS, et al. Simple and highly efficient synthesis of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine using nucleophilic fluorination catalyzed by protic solvent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1406–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu S, Liu Z, Chen K, Yan Y, Watzlowik P, Wester HJ, et al. 18F-labeled galacto and PEGylated RGD dimers for PET Imaging of αvβ3 integrin expression. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:530–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Higashi T, Tamaki N, Honda T, Torizuka T, Kimura T, Inokuma T, et al. Expression of glucose transporters in human pancreatic tumors compared with increased FDG accumulation in PET study. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1337–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Cruijsen H, van der Veldt A, Hoekman K. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of VEGF receptors: clinical issues and remaining questions. Front Biosci. 2009;14:2248–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Herbst RS, Mullani NA, Davis DW, Hess KR, McConkey DJ, Charnsangavej C, et al. Development of biologic markers of response and assessment of antiangiogenic activity in a clinical trial of human recombinant endostatin. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3804–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weber WA. Monitoring tumor response to therapy with 18F-FLT PET. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:841–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Apisarnthanarax S, Alauddin MM, Mourtada F, Ariga H, Raju U, Mawlawi O, et al. Early detection of chemoradioresponse in esophageal carcinoma by 3'-deoxy-3'-3H-fluorothymidine using preclinical tumor models. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4590–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leyton J, Latigo JR, Perumal M, Dhaliwal H, He Q, Aboagye EO. Early detection of tumor response to chemotherapy by 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: the effect of cisplatin on a fibrosarcoma tumor model in vivo. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4202–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wei LH, Su H, Hildebrandt IJ, Phelps ME, Czernin J, Weber WA. Changes in tumor metabolism as readout for Mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibition by rapamycin in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3416–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shields AF, Lawhorn-Crews JM, Briston DA, Zalzala S, Gadgeel S, Douglas KA, et al. Analysis and reproducibility of 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4463–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    de Langen AJ, Klabbers B, Lubberink M, Boellaard R, Spreeuwenberg MD, Slotman BJ, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative 18F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine measurements using positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:389–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cai W, Gambhir SS, Chen X. Multimodality tumor imaging targeting integrin αvβ3. Biotechniques. 2005;39:S14–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Morrison MS, Ricketts SA, Barnett J, Cuthbertson A, Tessier J, Wedge SR. Use of a novel Arg-Gly-Asp radioligand, 18F-AH111585, to determine changes in tumor vascularity after antitumor therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:116–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McParland BJ, Miller MP, Spinks TJ, Kenny LM, Osman S, Khela MK, et al. The biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the Arg-Gly-Asp peptide 18F-AH111585 in healthy volunteers. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1664–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beer AJ, Haubner R, Sarbia M, Goebel M, Luderschmidt S, Grosu AL, et al. Positron emission tomography using [18F]Galacto-RGD identifies the level of integrin αvβ3 expression in man. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3942–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mittra E, Goris ML, Iagaru AH, Kardan A, Burton L, Berganos R, et al. First in man pharmacokinetic and dosimetry studies of [18F]FPPRGD2: A novel PET radiopharmaceutical for imaging αvβ3 integrin levels. Radiology. In press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jung KH, Lee KH, Paik JY, Ko BH, Bae JS, Lee BC, et al. Favorable biokinetic and tumor-targeting properties of 99mTc-labeled glucosamino RGD and effect of paclitaxel therapy. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:2000–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dumont RA, Hildebrandt I, Su H, Haubner R, Reischl G, Czernin JG, et al. Noninvasive imaging of αvβ3 function as a predictor of the antimigratory and antiproliferative effects of dasatinib. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3173–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun X, Yan Y, Liu S, Cao Q, Yang M, Neamati N, et al. 18F-FPPRGD2 and 18F-FDG PET imaging of Abraxane therapy response. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:140–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dandekar M, Tseng JR, Gambhir SS. Reproducibility of 18F-FDG microPET studies in mouse tumor xenografts. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:602–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chang E, Liu S, Gowrishankar G, Yaghoubi S, Wedgeworth JP, Chin F, et al. Reproducibility study of [18F]FPPRGD2 uptake in murine models of human tumor xenografts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1672-1.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA)  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haokao Gao
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yongjun Yan
    • 2
  • Xilin Sun
    • 2
  • Kai Chen
    • 2
  • Qimeng Quan
    • 2
  • Lixin Lang
    • 2
  • Dale Kiesewetter
    • 2
  • Gang Niu
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xiaoyuan Chen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Ministry of Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear MedicineJiangsu Institute of Nuclear MedicineWuxiChina
  2. 2.Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)National Institutes of Health (NIH)BethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Cardiology, Xijing HospitalThe Fourth Military Medical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations