Preliminary evaluation of 177Lu-labeled knottin peptides for integrin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy

  • Lei Jiang
  • Zheng Miao
  • Richard H. Kimura
  • Hongguang Liu
  • Jennifer R. Cochran
  • Cathy S. Culter
  • Ande Bao
  • Peiyong LiEmail author
  • Zhen ChengEmail author
Original Article



Cystine knot peptides (knottins) 2.5D and 2.5F were recently engineered to bind integrin receptors with high affinity and specificity. These receptors are overexpressed on the surface of a variety of malignant human tumor cells and tumor neovasculature. In this study, 2.5D and 2.5F were labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide, 177Lu, and the resulting radiopeptides were then evaluated as potential radiotherapeutic agents in a murine model of human glioma xenografts.


Knottins 2.5D and 2.5F were synthesized using solid phase peptide synthesis, folded in vitro, and site-specifically coupled with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N′′,N′′′-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) at their N terminus for 177Lu radiolabeling. The stability of the radiopeptides 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D and 177Lu-DOTA-2.5F was tested in both phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and mouse serum. Cell uptake assays of the radiolabeled peptides were performed in U87MG integrin-expressing human glioma cells. The biodistribution studies of both 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D and 177Lu-DOTA-2.5F were examined in U87MG tumor-bearing athymic nu/nu mice. Radiation absorbed doses for the major tissues of a human adult male were calculated based on the mouse biodistribution results.


DOTA-2.5D and DOTA-2.5F were labeled with 177Lu at over 55% efficiency. High radiochemical purity for both radiocomplexes (> 95%) could be achieved after high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification. Both radiopeptides were stable in PBS and mouse serum. Compared to 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D (0.39 and 0.26 %ID/g at 2 and 24 h, respectively), 177Lu-DOTA-2.5F showed much higher tumor uptake (2.16 and 0.78 %ID/g at 2 and 24 h, respectively). It also displayed higher tumor to blood ratios than that of 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D (31.8 vs 18.7 at 24 h and 52.6 vs 20.6 at 72 h). Calculation of radiodosimetry for 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D and 177Lu-DOTA-2.5F suggested that tumor and kidney were tissues with the highest radiation absorbed doses. Moreover, 177Lu-DOTA-2.5F had a higher tumor to kidney radiation absorbed dose ratio than that of 177Lu-DOTA-2.5D.


Cystine knot peptides can be successfully radiolabeled with 177Lu for potential therapeutic applications. Knottin 2.5F labeled with 177Lu exhibits favorable distribution in murine U87MG xenograft model; thus, it is a promising agent for radionuclide therapy of integrin-positive tumors.


177Lu Cystine knot peptide Integrin Radionuclide therapy 



This work was supported, in part, by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5R01 CA119053 (ZC), and the In Vivo Cellular Molecular Imaging Center (ICMIC) grant P50 CA114747 (SSG), the Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Foundation (JRC), as well as a Ph.D. student fellowship from the China Scholarship Council (LJ).

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Curley GP, Blum H, Humphries MJ. Integrin antagonists. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;56:427–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iagaru A, Chen X, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging can accelerate anti-angiogenic drug development and testing. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007;4:556–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai W, Rao J, Gambhir SS, Chen X. How molecular imaging is speeding up antiangiogenic drug development. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:2624–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1996;12:697–715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Streuli CH, Akhtar N. Signal co-operation between integrins and other receptor systems. Biochem J 2009;418:491–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hynes RO. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 1992;69:11–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seftor RE, Seftor EA, Gehlsen KR, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Brown PD, Ruoslahti E, et al. Role of the alpha v beta 3 integrin in human melanoma cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:1557–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science 1994;264:569–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu S. Radiolabeled cyclic RGD peptides as integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted radiotracers: maximizing binding affinity via bivalency. Bioconjug Chem 2009;20:2199–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cai W, Chen X. Multimodality molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis. J Nucl Med 2008;49 Suppl 2:113S–28S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beer AJ, Schwaiger M. Imaging of integrin alphavbeta3 expression. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2008;27:631–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng Z, Wu Y, Xiong Z, Gambhir SS, Chen X. Near-infrared fluorescent RGD peptides for optical imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression in living mice. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:1433–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pallaghy PK, Nielsen KJ, Craik DJ, Norton RS. A common structural motif incorporating a cystine knot and a triple-stranded beta-sheet in toxic and inhibitory polypeptides. Protein Sci 1994;3:1833–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craik DJ, Daly NL, Bond T, Waine C. Plant cyclotides: a unique family of cyclic and knotted proteins that defines the cyclic cystine knot structural motif. J Mol Biol 1999;294:1327–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolmar H. Engineered cystine-knot miniproteins for diagnostic applications. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2010;10:361–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolmar H. Alternative binding proteins: biological activity and therapeutic potential of cystine-knot miniproteins. FEBS J 2008;275:2684–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Craik DJ, Cemazar M, Wang CK, Daly NL. The cyclotide family of circular miniproteins: nature’s combinatorial peptide template. Biopolymers 2006;84:250–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lahti JL, Silverman AP, Cochran JR. Interrogating and predicting tolerated sequence diversity in protein folds: application to E. elaterium trypsin inhibitor-II cystine-knot miniprotein. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silverman AP, Levin AM, Lahti JL, Cochran JR. Engineered cystine-knot peptides that bind alpha(v)beta(3) integrin with antibody-like affinities. J Mol Biol 2009;385:1064–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kimura RH, Levin AM, Cochran FV, Cochran JR. Engineered cystine knot peptides that bind alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and alpha5beta1 integrins with low-nanomolar affinity. Proteins 2009;77:359–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimura RH, Cheng Z, Gambhir SS, Cochran JR. Engineered knottin peptides: a new class of agents for imaging integrin expression in living subjects. Cancer Res 2009;69:2435–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miao Z, Ren G, Liu H, Kimura RH, Jiang L, Cochran JR, et al. An engineered knottin peptide labeled with 18F for PET imaging of integrin expression. Bioconjug Chem 2009;20:2342–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kimura RH, Miao Z, Cheng Z, Gambhir SS, Cochran JR. A dual-labeled knottin peptide for PET and near-infrared fluorescence imaging of integrin expression in living subjects. Bioconjug Chem 2010 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang L, Kimura RH, Miao Z, Silverman AP, Ren G, Liu H, et al. Evaluation of a (64)Cu-labeled cystine-knot peptide based on agouti-related protein for PET of tumors expressing αvβ3 integrin. J Nucl Med 2010;51:251–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miao Z, Levi J, Cheng Z. Protein scaffold-based molecular probes for cancer molecular imaging. Amino Acids 2010, Feb 21. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng Z, Chen J, Quinn TP, Jurisson SS. Radioiodination of rhenium cyclized alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone resulting in enhanced radioactivity localization and retention in melanoma. Cancer Res 2004;64:1411–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1023–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eckerman KF, Endo A. MIRD: radionuclide data and decay schemes. 2nd ed. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2008. p. 460–1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Volkert WA, Hoffman TJ. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Chem Rev 1999;99:2269–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reubi JC, Mäcke HR, Krenning EP. Candidates for peptide receptor radiotherapy today and in the future. J Nucl Med 2005;46 Suppl 1:67S–75S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Kwekkeboom DJ, De Jong LC, Krenning EP. Practical aspects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu][DOTA0, Tyr3]octreotate. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;50:265–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pool SE, Krenning EP, Koning GA, van Eijck CH, Teunissen JJ, Kam B, et al. Preclinical and clinical studies of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Semin Nucl Med 2010;40:209–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Panigone S, Nunn AD. Lutetium-177-labeled gastrin releasing peptide receptor binding analogs: a novel approach to radionuclide therapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;50:310–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Craik DJ, Daly NL, Waine C. The cystine knot motif in toxins and implications for drug design. Toxicon 2001;39:43–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chiche L, Heitz A, Gelly JC, Gracy J, Chau PT, Ha PT, et al. Squash inhibitors: from structural motifs to macrocyclic knottins. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2004;5:341–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu S. Bifunctional coupling agents for radiolabeling of biomolecules and target-specific delivery of metallic radionuclides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:1347–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu S, Edwards DS. Bifunctional chelators for therapeutic lanthanide radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjug Chem 2001;12:7–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lewis JS, Anderson CJ. Radiometal-labeled somatostatin analogs for applications in cancer imaging and therapy. Methods Mol Biol 2007;386:227–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee S, Xie J, Chen X. Peptides and peptide hormones for molecular imaging and disease diagnosis. Chem Rev 2010;110:3087–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen J, Cheng Z, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Melanoma-targeting properties of (99m)technetium-labeled cyclic alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Cancer Res 2000;60:5649–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zheng Miao
    • 2
  • Richard H. Kimura
    • 3
  • Hongguang Liu
    • 2
  • Jennifer R. Cochran
    • 3
  • Cathy S. Culter
    • 4
  • Ande Bao
    • 5
  • Peiyong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhen Cheng
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford Cancer Center, Bio-X ProgramStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Cancer Center, Bio-X ProgramStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Research Reactor CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  5. 5.Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations