Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data
- 1.3k Downloads
The combination of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) tomography in a single device is anticipated to be the next step following PET/CT for future molecular imaging application. Compared to CT, the main advantages of MR are versatile soft tissue contrast and its capability to acquire functional information without ionizing radiation. However, MR is not capable of measuring a physical quantity that would allow a direct derivation of the attenuation values for high-energy photons.
To overcome this problem, we propose a fully automated approach that uses a dedicated T1-weighted MR sequence in combination with a customized image processing technique to derive attenuation maps for whole-body PET. The algorithm automatically identifies the outer contour of the body and the lungs using region-growing techniques in combination with an intensity analysis for automatic threshold estimation. No user interaction is required to generate the attenuation map.
The accuracy of the proposed MR-based attenuation correction (AC) approach was evaluated in a clinical study using whole-body PET/CT and MR images of the same patients (n = 15). The segmentation of the body and lung contour (L-R directions) was evaluated via a four-point scale in comparison to the original MR image (mean values >3.8). PET images were reconstructed using elastically registered MR-based and CT-based (segmented and non-segmented) attenuation maps. The MR-based AC showed similar behaviour as CT-based AC and similar accuracy as offered by segmented CT-based AC. Standardized uptake value (SUV) comparisons with reference to CT-based AC using predefined attenuation coefficients showed the largest difference for bone lesions (mean value ± standard variation of SUVmax: −3.0% ± 3.9% for MR; −6.5% ± 4.1% for segmented CT). A blind comparison of PET images corrected with segmented MR-based, CT-based and segmented CT-based AC afforded identical lesion detectability, but slight differences in image quality were found.
Our MR‐based attenuation correction method offers similar correction accuracy as offered by segmented CT. According to the specialists involved in the blind study, these differences do not affect the diagnostic value of the PET images.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging MRI MR Positron emission tomography PET Attenuation correction Whole body PET/MR MR-AC MR-based
This work was supported by the EU FP7 project HYPERImage (grant agreement 201651).
Conflicts of interest
The first seven authors are employees of Philips.
- 1.Kops ER, Herzog H. Alternative methods for attenuation correction for PET images in MR-PET scanners. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2007;6:4327–30.Google Scholar
- 2.Catana A, et al. Is accurate bone segmentation required for MR-based PET attenuation correction? Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009;17:593.Google Scholar
- 4.van der Kouwe AJ, et al. Challenges for MR-based attenuation correction in PET imaging of the head. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009;17:2810.Google Scholar
- 5.Marshall HR, et al. Use of multi-spectral MR data to generate an attenuation map for application to PET/MR hybrid imaging. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009;17:4698.Google Scholar
- 6.Hofmann M, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for PET/MR. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009;17:260.Google Scholar
- 13.Salomon A, Schulz V, Brinks R, Schweizer B, Goedicke A. Iterative generation of attenuation maps in TOF-PET/MR using consistency conditions. SNM’s 56th Annual Meeting, 13–17 June 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.Hu Z, Ojha N, Renisch S, Schulz V, Torres I, Buhl A, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2009;M11–6.Google Scholar
- 17.Sensakovic WF, Armato SG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lung: automated segmentation methods. Methods of cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis, Vol 2. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- 18.Valk PE, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN. Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. London: Springer; 2004. 3rd printing.Google Scholar
- 19.Wiemker R, Pekar V. Fast computation of isosurface contour spectra for volume visualization. Proc Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2001;1230:389–94.Google Scholar
- 24.Corder GW, Foreman DI. Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: a step-by-step approach. New Jersey: Wiley; 2009.Google Scholar
- 25.Keereman V, et al. Estimation of attenuation maps from UTE derived R2 image. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009;17:2774.Google Scholar