The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate
- 665 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate the additional value of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over whole-body planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT in prostate cancer patients in terms of diagnostic confidence, inter-reviewer agreement and the possible impact on the clinical management.
This was a retrospective review of 40 consecutive prostate cancer patients (mean age 71 years) who underwent 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) whole-body planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT and SPECT/CT between April 2006 and April 2008. The images were evaluated by two independent reviewers; inter-reviewer agreement was evaluated using a weighted kappa score. Each focus of abnormal increased tracer uptake was recorded using a 4-point diagnostic confidence scale. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Fifty lesions on planar bone scintigraphy in the 40 patients were evaluated. On reporting the planar study and SPECT scans, reviewers rated 61% of lesions as equivocal. On reporting the SPECT/CT scans only 8% of lesions were rated as equivocal, 24% were rated as malignant and 68% as benign. Weighted kappa scores for inter-reviewer agreement were 0.43 for bone scintigraphy, 0.56 for SPECT and 0.87 for SPECT/CT. All were significant at p < 0.0001. Follow-up imaging confirmed the SPECT/CT diagnoses in 14 patients.
The addition of SPECT/CT resulted in a significant reduction of equivocal reports; a definitive diagnosis was given in the majority of the patients due to the improved diagnostic confidence compared to planar or SPECT imaging alone in prostate cancer patients with suspected bone metastases.
KeywordsSPECT/CT Bony metastasis Prostate cancer
- 1.Heidenreich A, Aus G, Abbou C, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev V, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology 2007.Google Scholar
- 3.National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Improving outcomes in urological cancer 2002.Google Scholar
- 14.Raghavan D, Scher HI, Leibel SA, Lange PH. Principles and practice of genitourinary oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.Google Scholar
- 16.Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. 2006. http://www.arsac.org.uk/notes_for_guidence/documents/ARSACNFG2006Corrected06-11-07.pdf. 2008.
- 17.Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. 2000. Accessed 12 Dec 2007.Google Scholar
- 18.National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment. NICE Clinical Guideline 58. 2008. http://www.nice.nhs.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG58NICEGuideline.pdf. 2008.