Efficacy of using a standard activity of 131I-MIBG therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours

  • Shaunak Navalkissoor
  • Dona M. Alhashimi
  • Ann-Marie Quigley
  • Martyn E. Caplin
  • John R. Buscombe
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the response to standard activity of 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), comparing overall survival of patients with symptomatic response, tumour size (as assessed by CT) and relevant plasma tumour markers.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who had undergone 131I-MIBG treatment between March 2001 and December 2006 was carried out. The administered activity of 131I-MIBG was 5.5 GBq (NETs) and 7 GBq (phaeochromocytoma). Three cycles of treatment were planned with an interval of 10–12 weeks. A pre-therapy scan with 123I-MIBG was performed to ascertain appropriate biodistribution.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were identified. Only two patients developed significant bone marrow suppression. Symptomatic response: data were available in 37 of 38 patients: 15 patients had improved symptoms, 19 had no improvement in symptoms and 3 were asymptomatic. In those with a symptomatic response, the median overall survival was 58 months vs no response of 20.0 months (p = 0.001). CT response: in those with stable disease, the median overall survival was 58 months compared with progressive disease of 16.0 months. The difference between these groups was significant (p = 0.006). Hormonal response: this was available in only 20 of 38 patients. The median overall survival was the same for patients that had increased hormone levels and patients that had stable/decreased hormone levels (48 months).

Conclusion

Standard activity 131I-MIBG is well tolerated. Symptomatic response to treatment is a significant predictor of overall survival. Whilst CT response also appears to predict survival, hormonal levels do not appear to correlate with survival.

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumours Therapy 131I-MIBG (meta-iodobenzylguanidine) Efficacy 

References

  1. 1.
    Wieland DM, Swanson DP, Brown LE, Beierwaltes WH. Imaging the adrenal medulla with an I-131-labeled antiadrenergic agent. J Nucl Med 1979;20:155–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wafelman AR, Hoefnagel CA, Maes RA, Beijnen JH. Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine: a review of its biodistribution and pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, cytotoxicity and dosimetry. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:545–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaltsas G, Korbonits M, Heintz E, Mukherjee JJ, Jenkins PJ, Chew SL, et al. Comparison of somatostatin analog and meta-iodobenzylguanidine radionuclides in the diagnosis and localization of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:895–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rufini V, Calcagni ML, Baum RP. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2006;36:228–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quigley AM, Buscombe JR, Shah T, Gnanasegaran G, Roberts D, Caplin ME, et al. Intertumoural variability in functional imaging within patients suffering from neuroendocrine tumours. An observational, cross-sectional study. Neuroendocrinology 2005;82(3–4):215–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McEwan AJ, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Bierwaltes WH, Ackery DM. Radio-iodobenzylguanidine for the scintigraphic location and therapy of adrenergic tumors. Semin Nucl Med 1985;15:132–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoefnagel CA. Metaiodobenzylguanidine and somatostatin in oncology: role in the management of neural crest tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:561–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loh KC, Fitzgerald PA, Matthy KK, Yeo PPB, Price DC. The treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma with iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG): a comprehensive review of 116 reported patients. J Endocrinol Invest 1997;20:648–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buscombe JR, Cwikla JB, Caplin ME, Hilson AJ. Long-term efficacy of low activity meta-[131I]iodobenzylguanidine therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours depends on initial response. Nucl Med Commun 2005;26:969–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Safford SD, Coleman RE, Gockerman JP, Moore J, Feldman J, Onaitis MW, et al. Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment for metastatic carcinoid. Results in 98 patients. Cancer 2004;101(9):1987–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taal BG, Hoefnagel CA, Valdes Olmos RA, Boot H, Beijnen JH. Palliative effect of metaiodobenzylguanidine in metastatic carcinoid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1829–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mukherjee JJ, Kaltsas GA, Islam N, Plowman PN, Foley R, Hikmat J, et al. Treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumours, phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and medullary carcinoma of the thyroid with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001;55:47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bomanji J, Britton KE, Ur E, Hawkins L, Grossman AB, Besser GM. Treatment of malignant phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and carcinoid tumours with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Nucl Med Commun 1993;14:856–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nwosu AC, Jones L, Vora J, Poston GJ, Vinjamuri S, Pritchard DM. Assessment of the efficacy and toxicity of (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer 2008;98:1053–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sywak MS, Pasieka JL, McEwan A, Kline G, Rorstad O. 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine in the management of metastatic midgut carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 2004;28:1157–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giovanella LC. Chromogranin A: a circulating neuroendocrine marker—biology, pathology, assay technology and clinical applications. Cisbio www.ria-cis.com/ressources/produits/00370%20CIS%20CHROMOGRANIN%20GB.pdf
  17. 17.
    Fielding SL, Flower MA, Ackery D, Kemshead JT, Lashford LS, Lewis I. Dosimetry of iodine 131 metaiodobenzylguanidine for treatment of resistant neuroblastoma: results of a UK study. Eur J Nucl Med 1991;18:308–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monsieurs M, Brans B, Bacher K, Dierckx R, Thierens H. Patient dosimetry for 131I-MIBG therapy for neuroendocrine tumours based on 123I-MIBG scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29(12):1581–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Modlin IM, Latich I, Zikusoka M, Kidd M, Eick G, Chan AK. Gastrointestinal carcinoids: the evolution of diagnostic strategies. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:572–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paganelli G, Bodei L, Handkiewicz Junak D, Rocca P, Papi S, Lopera Sierra M, et al. 90Y-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide in therapy of neuroendocrine malignancies. Biopolymers 2002;66:393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwekkeboom DJ, de Herder WW, Kam BL, van Eijck CH, van Essen M, Kooij PP, et al. Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2124–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madsen M, Bushnell D, Juweid ME, Menda Y, O’Dorisio MS, O’Dorisio T, et al. Potential increased tumor-dose delivery with combined 131I-MIBG and 90Y-DOTATOC treatment in neuroendocrine tumors: a theoretic model. J Nucl Med 2006;47:660–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaunak Navalkissoor
    • 1
  • Dona M. Alhashimi
    • 1
  • Ann-Marie Quigley
    • 1
  • Martyn E. Caplin
    • 2
  • John R. Buscombe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear MedicineRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations