18F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: consideration of lymph node calcification and distribution pattern to improve specificity
- 375 Downloads
The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a region with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease.
Between March 2004 and February 2006, all patients with NSCLC underwent FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced thoracic CT, and subsequent surgical resection. PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT images of 182 patients (126 men and 56 women; mean age 60.7 years) with NSCLC were acquired. Mediastinal node staging was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Surgical and histological findings served as the reference standard.
A total of 182 patients with 778 mediastinal node stations were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT were 36% and 80% on a per-patient basis and 23% and 92% on a per-node station basis. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 81% and 73% on a per-patient basis and 75% and 85% on a per-node station basis. After lymph nodes with calcification and bilateral hilar distribution were considered benign, sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 75% and 89% on a per-patient basis and 66% and 96% on a per-node station basis.
This prospective study suggests that FDG PET/CT can more accurately stage mediastinal lymph nodes than CT. Considering lymph node calcification and distribution pattern could improve specificity at the cost of a decrease in sensitivity.
KeywordsLung cancer Positron emission tomography (PET) 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Staging
- 3.Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 2002.Google Scholar
- 4.Bayman NA, Blackhall F, Jain P, Lee L, Thatcher N, Faivre-Finn C. Management of unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer with combined-modality therapy: a review of the current literature and recommendations for treatment. Clin Lung Cancer 2008;9:92–101. doi:10.3816/CLC.2008.n.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kamiyoshihara M, Kawashima O, Ishikawa S, Morishita Y. Mediastinal lymph node evaluation by computed tomographic scan in lung cancer. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2001;42:119–24.Google Scholar
- 22.Yen RF, Chen KC, Lee JM, Chang YC, Wang J, Cheng MF, et al. 18F-FDG PET for the lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: is dual time point imaging worth the effort? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1305–15. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0733-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Hwangbo B, Kim SK, Lee HS, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, et al. Application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration following integrated positron emission tomography/CT in mediastinal staging of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2008 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar