[18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type-1

  • Victoria S. Warbey
  • Rosalie E. Ferner
  • Joel T. Dunn
  • Eduardo Calonje
  • Michael J. O’Doherty
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT (FDG PET/CT with early and delayed imaging) in patients with symptomatic neurofibromas, to revalidate current cut-off values for identification of malignant change within neurofibromas and to examine the relationship between SUV and tumour grade.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic neurofibromas underwent FDG PET/CT imaging at 90 and 240 min. Semiquantitative analysis using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was performed and correlated with histology.

Result

In 69 patients, 85 lesions were identified for analysis, including 10 atypical neurofibromas and 21 MPNSTs. Sensitivity of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing NF1-associated MPNST was 0.97 (95% CI 0.81–0.99) and the specificity was 0.87 (CI 0.74–0.95). There was a significant difference in SUVmax between early and delayed imaging and in SUVmax between tumours identified as benign and malignant on PET/CT. There was also a significant difference in SUVmax between tumour grades.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality for the diagnosis of MPNST in NF1 patients. We recommend performing early (90 min) and delayed imaging at 4 h for accurate lesion characterization and using a cut-off SUVmax of 3.5 on delayed imaging to achieve maximal sensitivity.

Keywords

FDG PET Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour Neurofibromatosis 1 Plexiform neurofibroma 

References

  1. 1.
    Compston DAS, Clark P, Harper PS. A genetic study of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. I. Prevalence, fitness, mutation rate, and effect of parental transmission on severity. J Med Genet 1989;26(11):704–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferner RE. Neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2: a twenty first century perspective. Lancet Neurol 2007;6(4):340–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferner RE, Gutmann DH. International consensus statement on malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. Cancer Res 2002;62:1573–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet 2002;39(5):311–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferner RE, Lucas JD, O’Doherty MJ, Hughes RAC, Smith MA, Cronin BF, et al. Evaluation of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDGPET) in the detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours arising from within plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2000;68:353–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardona S, Schwarzbach M, Hinz U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Attigah N, Mechtersheimer G, et al. Evaluation of F18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to assess the nature of neurogenic tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:536–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brenner W, Friedrich RE, Gawad KA, Hagel C, von Deimling A, de Witt M, et al. Prognostic relevance of FDG PET in patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:428–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bredella MA, Torriani M, Hornicek F, Ouellette HA, Palmer WE, Williams Z, et al. Value of PET in the assessment of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:928–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferner RE, Golding JF, Smith M, Calonje E, Jan W, Sanjayanathan V, et al. [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a diagnostic tool for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs): a long-term clinical study. Ann Oncol 2008;19(2):390–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, Rouesse J, Bui NB, de Mascarel A, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histological grading system. Int J Cancer 1984;33(1):37–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ortonne N, Lantieri L, Ferkal S, Wechsler J, Bagot M, et al. Histopathologically dysplastic neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1: diagnostic criteria, prevalence and clinical significance. Br J Dermatol 2008;58:1008–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin BT-Y, Weiss LM, Medeiros LJ, Jeffrey L. Neurofibroma and cellular neurofibroma with atypia: a report of 14 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1443–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lodge MA, Lucas JD, Marsden PK, Cronin BF, O’Doherty MJ, Smith MA. A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 1999;26:22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986;58:2006–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Visvikis D, Costa DC, Croasdale I, Lonn AHR, Bomanji J, Gacinovic S, et al. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:344–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Somer EJ, Benatar NA, O’Doherty MJ, Smith MA, Marsden PK. Use of the CT component of PET-CT to improve PET-MR registration: demonstration in soft tissue sarcoma. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:6991–7006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria S. Warbey
    • 1
  • Rosalie E. Ferner
    • 3
  • Joel T. Dunn
    • 2
  • Eduardo Calonje
    • 4
  • Michael J. O’Doherty
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical PET Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Clinical PET Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences, Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’ School of MedicineKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of DermatopathologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations