Long-term evaluation of renal toxicity after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE: the role of associated risk factors
- First Online:
- 829 Downloads
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumours with 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE is promising. The kidney is the critical organ and despite renal protection, function loss may become evident years later. The aim of this study was to analyse renal parameters in patients who had undergone dosimetry before PRRT.
Among those in protocols at our institution, 28 patients were considered: 23 received 90Y-DOTATOC (3.8–29.2 GBq, median 12.2) and five received 177Lu-DOTATATE (20.7–29.2 GBq, median 23.2). Patients were followed up after therapy for creatinine and creatinine clearance loss (CCL) for 3–97 months (median 30). Renal doses and bio-effective doses (BED) were calculated (MIRD, LQ model).
After 90Y-DOTATOC toxicity on creatinine according to NCI criteria occurred in nine cases (seven grade 1, one grade 2, one grade 3), CCL at 1 year was >5% in 12 cases and >10% in eight. A 28-Gy BED threshold was observed in patients with risk factors (mainly hypertension and diabetes), while it was 40 Gy in patients without risk factors. Probably due to the low number of patients, despite the absence of severe toxicity after hyper-fractionated PRRT, clear correlations between fractionation and toxicity could not be found. After 177Lu-DOTATATE, no toxicity occurred in 1–2 year follow-up; CCL at 1 year >5% occurred in three patients and >10% in two.
Our results indicate the importance of clinical screening for risk factors: In this case, a BED <28 Gy is recommended. Fractionation of therapy is important in order to decrease toxicity, and further studies are needed to evaluate its clinical impact.
KeywordsRenal toxicity 90Y-DOTATOC 177Lu-DOTATATE Radionuclide therapy Dosimetry
- 11.Bodei L, Cremonesi M, Grana C, Bartolomei M, Baio SM, Bufi G, et al. Receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(Suppl 2):S214.Google Scholar
- 17.Savi A, Lecchi M, Albertini F, Chiesa C, Gilardi MC, Bombardieri E, et al. Evaluation of attenuation correction in planar In-111 biodistribution studies [abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31(Suppl):S229.Google Scholar
- 19.Cremonesi M, Ferrari M, Bodei L, Bartolomei M, Chinol M, Mei R, et al. Dosimetry in patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy with indications for 90Y-DOTATATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(Suppl 1):S102. Abs 91.Google Scholar
- 20.Siegel JA, Thomas SR, Stubbs JB, Stabin MG, Hays MT, Koral KF, et al. Techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates: MIRD pamphlet no16. J Nucl Med 1999;40(2):S37–S61.Google Scholar
- 23.Foster D, Barret P (editors). Developing and testing integrated multicompartment models to describe a single-input multiple-output study using the SAAM II software system. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education;1998.Google Scholar
- 30.National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Misadministration of radioactive material in medicine–scientific background. Bethesda, MD 1991:27Google Scholar