Changing paradigm: atherosclerosis versus ischaemia

Editorial commentary

References

  1. 1.
    Schuijf JD, Poldermans D, Shaw LJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, de Roos A, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hachamovitch R, Berman DS. The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 2005;35:62–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hacker M, Jakobs T, Hack N, Nikolaou K, Becker C, von Ziegler F, et al. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:DOI 10.1007/s00259-006-0207-2
  7. 7.
    Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1294–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, Deckelbaum LI, Joye JD, Dahlberg ST, et al. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. Circulation 1997;96:484–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chamuleau SA, Tio RA, de Cock CC, de Muinck ED, Pijls NH, van Eck-Smit BL, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:852–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Schuijf
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. E. van der Wall
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. J. Bax
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the NetherlandsUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations