Advertisement

ST segment elevation in lead aVR during exercise testing is associated with LAD stenosis

  • Johanne Neill
  • Heather J. Shannon
  • Amanda Morton
  • Alison R. Muir
  • Mark Harbinson
  • Jennifer A. Adgey
Original article

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate, in patients with chest pain, the diagnostic value of ST elevation (STE) in lead aVR during stress testing prior to 99m Tc-sestamibi scanning correlating ischaemic territory with angiographic findings.

Methods

Consecutive patients attending for 99m Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) completed a treadmill protocol. Peak exercise ECGs were coded. STE ≥0.05 mV in lead aVR was considered significant. Gated perfusion images and findings at angiography were assessed.

Results

STE in lead aVR occurred in 25% (138/557) of the patients. More patients with STE in aVR had a reversible defect on imaging compared with those who had no STE in aVR (41%, 56/138 vs 27%, 114/419, p=0.003). Defects indicating a left anterior descending artery (LAD) culprit lesion were more common in the STE in aVR group (20%, 27/138 vs 9%, 39/419, p=0.001). There was a trend towards coronary artery stenosis (>70%) in a double vessel distribution involving the LAD in those patients who had STE in aVR compared with those who did not (22%, 8/37 vs 5%, 4/77, p=0.06). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that STE in aVR (OR 1.36, p=0.233) is not an independent predictor of inducible abnormality when adjusted for STD >0.1 mV (OR 1.69, p=0.026). However, using anterior wall defect as an end-point, STE in aVR (OR 2.77, p=0.008) was a predictor even after adjustment for STD (OR 1.43, p=0.281).

Conclusion

STE in lead aVR during exercise does not diagnose more inducible abnormalities than STD alone. However, unlike STD, which is not predictive of a territory of ischaemia, STE in aVR may indicate an anterior wall defect.

Keywords

Myocardial ischaemia Diagnostic techniques Cardiovascular Electrocardiography Radionuclide imaging Lead aVR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was completed with the invaluable assistance of Mrs. Helen Long, MSC, BSE, Chief Cardiac Physiologist and Dr. Chris Patterson, medical statistician. The authors have had full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the EJNMMI to review such data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Dunn RF, Freedman B, Bailey IK, Uren RF, Kelly DT. Localisation of coronary disease with exercise electrocardiography: correlation with thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scanning. Am J Cardiol 1981;48:837–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, Lehmann K, Dubach P, Colombo A, et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 1989;80:87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamaji H, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, Murakami T, Hirami R, Hamamoto H, et al. Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography: ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V1. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1348–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorgels AP, Vos MA, Mulleneers R, de Zwaan C, Bar FW, Wellens HJ. Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:999–03.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaitonde RS, Sharma N, Ali-Hasan S, Miller JM, Jayachandran JV, Kalaria VG. Prediction of significant left main coronary artery stenosis by the 12-lead electrocardiogram in patients with rest angina pectoris and the withholding of clopidogrel therapy. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:846–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nikus KC, Sclarovsky S. ST elevation in lead aVR as a sign of left main disease-perpetuating an error? Am J Cardiol 2004;94:542–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrabés JA, Figueras J, Moure C, Cortadellas J, Soler-Soler J. Prognostic value of lead aVR in patients with a first non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;108:814–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engelen DJ, Gorgels AP, Cheriex EC, De Muinck ED, Ophuis AJ, Dassen WR, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in localising the occlusion site in the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:389–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michaelides, AP, Psomadaki ZD, Aigyptiadou MN, Richter DJ, Andrikopoulos GK, Dilaveris PE, et al. Significance of exercise-induced ST changes in leads aVR, V5 and V1. Discrimination of patients with single-or multivessel coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 2003;26(5):226–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halon D, Mevorach D, Rodeanu M, Lewis B. Improved criteria for localisation of coronary artery disease from the exercise electrocardiogram. Cardiology 1994;84:331–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michaelides AP, Psomadaki ZD, Richter DJ, Dilaveris PE, Andrikopoulos GK, Stefanadis C, et al. Significance of exercise-induced simultaneous ST-segment changes in lead aVR and V5. Int J Cardiol 1999;71:49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakamori H, Iwasaka T, Shimada T, Kamihata H, Karakawa M, Matsuura T, et al. Clinical significance of S-T segment elevation in lead aVR in anterior myocardial infarction: assessment by thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy. Cardiology 1995;86:147–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, Endo T, Hongo Y, Shigemasa T, et al. ST-segment depression in lead aVR predicts predischarge left ventricular dysfunction in patients with reperfused anterior acute myocardial infarction with anterolateral ST-segment elevation. Am Heart J 2001;142:51–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benoit T, Vivegnis D, Foulon J, Rigo P. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial single-photon emission tomographic imaging: application to the measurement of perfusion defect size and severity. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1603–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Viik J, Lehtinen R, Tech L, Turjanmaa V, Niemela K, Malmivuo J. The effect of lead selection on traditional and heart rate adjusted ST segment analysis in the detection of coronary artery disease during exercise testing. Am Heart J 1997;134:488–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanne Neill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heather J. Shannon
    • 1
  • Amanda Morton
    • 1
  • Alison R. Muir
    • 1
  • Mark Harbinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer A. Adgey
    • 1
  1. 1.Regional Medical Cardiology CentreRoyal Victoria HospitalBelfastUK
  2. 2.Queens UniversityBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations