11C-acetate PET in the early evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence
- 279 Downloads
The first aim of the study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 11C-acetate PET in the early detection of prostate cancer recurrence. A second aim was the evaluation of early and late PET in this context.
The study population comprised 32 prostate cancer patients with early evidence of relapse after initial radiotherapy (group A) or radical surgery (group B). The median PSA of group A (n=17) patients was 6 ng/ml (range 2.6–30.2) while that of group B (n=15) was 0.4 ng/ml (range 0.08–4.8). Pelvic-abdominal-thoracic PET was started 2 min after injection of 11C-acetate and evaluated after fusion with CT.
Group A: Taking a SUVmax≥2 as the cut-off, PET showed local recurrences in 14/17 patients and two equivocal results. Distant disease was observed in six patients and an equivocal result was obtained in one. Endorectal MRI was positive in 12/12 patients. Biopsy confirmed local recurrence in six of six (100%) patients. PET was positive in five of the six patients with biopsy-proven recurrences, the result in the remaining patient being equivocal. Group B: Among the 15 patients, visual interpretation was positive for local recurrences in five patients and equivocal in four. One obturator lymph node was positive. Endorectal MRI was positive in 11/15 patients and equivocal in two. Positional correlation of positive/equivocal results on PET and endorectal MRI was observed in seven of nine patients. PSA decreased significantly after salvage radiotherapy in 8/14 patients, providing strong evidence for local recurrence. PET of the eight patients responding to RT was positive in three and equivocal in two.
11C-acetate PET was found to be valuable in the early evaluation of prostate cancer relapse. Optimising scanning time and use of modern PET-CT equipment might allow further improvement.
Keywords11C-acetate PET Prostate cancer relapse PSA
We acknowledge with thanks the generous donation from the foundation Cellex International that made this study possible. We also express our gratitude to the staff of the services of nuclear medicine and radiology who performed the imaging and to Mrs. Frances Godson for reviewing the manuscript.
- 6.Seltzer MA, Jahan SA, Dahlbom M, Sathyamurthy N, Barrio JR, Phelps ME, et al. Combined metabolic imaging using C-11 acetate and FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2003;44:132PGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cheng GC, Chen MH, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schnall MD, Tomaszewski JE, et al. Clinical utility of endorectal MRI in determining PSA outcome for patients with biopsy Gleason score 7, PSA <or=10, and clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cox JD, Gallagher MJ, Hammond EH, Kaplan RS, Schellhammer PF. Consensus statements on radiation therapy of prostate cancer: guidelines for prostate re-biopsy after radiation and for radiation therapy with rising prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. B J U Int 2005;95:751–6Google Scholar
- 23.Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37:1035–41Google Scholar
- 24.Horwitz EM, Thames HD, Kuban DA, Levy LB, Kupelian PA, Martinez AA, et al. Definitions of biochemical failure that best predict clinical failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation alone: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. J Urol 2005;173:797–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Soloviev D, Tamburella C. Technical report: captive solvent [11C]acetate synthesis in GMP conditions. Appl Radiat Isotopes 2006; in pressGoogle Scholar
- 35.Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Allaoua M, Haenggeli CA, El-Ghazi EA, Lehmann W, et al. Standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1398–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Malpica A, Matisic JP, Niekirk DV, Crum CP, Staerkel GA, Yamal JM, et al. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:S38–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar