Partial volume effect correction in SPECT for striatal uptake measurements in patients with neurodegenerative diseases: impact upon patient classification

  • Marine Soret
  • Pierre Malick  Koulibaly
  • Jacques Darcourt
  • Irène Buvat
Original article

Abstract

Purpose

In single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of the dopaminergic system, measurements of striatal uptake are useful for diagnosis and patient follow-up but are strongly biased by the partial volume effect (PVE). We studied whether PVE correction might improve patient classification based on binding potential (BP) measurements.

Methods

Patients with a probable diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB, 10 patients) or Alzheimer’s disease (AD, 13 patients) were studied by 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. SPECT images were reconstructed with and without PVE correction. Each patient SPECT scan was also simulated to obtain SPECT data whose characteristics were fully known. In addition, 17 SPECT scans were simulated with striatal uptake values mimicking pre-symptomatic cases of DLB.

Results

Without PVE correction, mean putamen BP values were 2.9±0.4 and 0.9±0.2 for AD and DLB patients respectively, while with PVE correction, they were 8.6±1.5 and 1.9±0.5 respectively. All patients were properly identified as having AD or DLB when considering mean putamen BP measured on their real or simulated SPECT scan, with and without PVE correction. All 30 simulations mimicking pre-symptomatic DLB and AD patients were accurately classified with PVE correction, but without PVE correction 15 mean putamen BP values were in a range where AD and DLB could not be distinguished.

Conclusion

We conclude that putamen BP values measured without PVE correction can be used to differentiate probable DLB and AD due to the already severe reduction in dopamine transporter levels. PVE correction appeared useful for accurate differential diagnosis between AD and pre-symptomatic DLB.

Keywords

Brain SPECT Dopamine transporter Lewy body disease Image processing 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the GDR CNRS – Inserm Stic-Santé (France).

References

  1. 1.
    Marek K, Seibyl J, Zoghbi S. [123I] beta-CIT SPECT imaging demonstrate bilateral loss of dopamine transporters in hemi-Parkinson’s diseases. Neurology 1996;46:231–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Booij J, Tissingh G, Boer G, Speelman J, Stoof J, Janssen A, et al. [123I]FP-CIT SPECT shows a pronounced decline of striatal dopamine transporter labelling in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:133–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benamer T, Patterson J, Grosset D, Booij J, de Bruin K, van Royen E, et al. Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group. Mov Disorder 2000;15:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Booij J, Tissingh G, Winogrodzka A, van Royen EA. Imaging of the dopaminergic neurotransmission system using single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with parkinsonism. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:171–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booij J, Speelman JD, Horstink MW, Wolters EC. The clinical benefit of imaging striatal dopamine transporters with 123I-FP-CIT SPET in differentiating patients with presynaptic parkinsonism from those with other forms of parkinsonism. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:266–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tatsch K, Asenbaum S, Bartenstein P, Catafau AM, Halldin C, Pillowsky LS et al. European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for brain neurotransmission SPET using 123I-labelled dopamine D2 receptor ligands. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:BP23–BP29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tatsch K. Imaging of the dopaminergic system in parkinsonism with SPET. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:819–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, Perry EK, Dickson DW, Hansen LA et al. Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology 1996;47:1113–1124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKeith LG, Ballard CG, Perry RH, Ince PG, O’Brien JT, Neill D et al. Prospective validation of consensus criteria for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 2000;54:1050–1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Brien JT, Colloby S, Fenwick J, Williams ED, Firbank M, Burn D et al. Dopamine transporter loss visualized with FP-CIT SPECT in the differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Arch Neurol 2004;61:919–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walker Z, Costa DC, Walker RW, Shaw K, Gacinovic S, Stevens T et al. Differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer’s disease using a dopaminergic presynaptic ligand. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walker Z, Costa DC, Walker RW, Lee L, Livingston G, Jaros E et al. Striatal dopamine transporter in dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease: a comparison. Neurology 2004;62:1568–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa DC, Walker Z, Walker RW, Fontes FR. Dementia with Lewy bodies versus Alzheimer’s disease: role of dopamine transporter imaging. Mov Disorder 2003;18:S34–S38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tatsch K, Asenbaum S, Bartenstein P, Catafau AM, Halldin C, Pillowsky LS et al. European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for brain neurotransmission SPET using 123I-labelled dopamine D2 transporter ligands. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:BP30–BP35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chouker M, Tatsch K, Linke R, Pogarell O, Hahn K, Schwarz J. Striatal dopamine transporter binding in early to moderate advanced Parkinson’s disease: monitoring of disease progression over 2 years. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:721–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marek K, Seibyl J, Shoulson I. Dopamine transporter brain imaging to assess the effects of Pramipexole vs levodopa on Parkinson disease progression. JAMA 2002;287:1653–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashimoto J, Sasaki T, Ogawa K, Kubo A, Motomura N, Ichihara T et al. Effects of scatter and attenuation correction on quantitative analysis of beta-CIT brain SPET. Nucl Med Commun 1999;20:159–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Almeida P, Ribeiro MJ, Bottlaender M, Loc’h C, Langer O, Strul D et al. Absolute quantitation of iodine-123 epidepride kinetics using single-photon emission tomography: comparison with carbon-11 epidepride and positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1580–1588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soret M, Koulibaly PM, Darcourt J, Hapdey S, Buvat I. Quantitative accuracy of dopaminergic neurotransmission imaging with 123I SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1184–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;3:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F. Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations. J Neurol Sci 1973;20:415–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prunier C, Bezard E, Montharu J, Mantzarides M, Besnard J-C, Baulieu J-L, et al. Presymptomatic diagnosis of experimental Parkinsonism with 123I-PE2I SPECT. Neuroimage 2003;19:810–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tissingh G, Booij J, Bergmans P, Winogrodzka A, Janssen AG, van Royen E et al. Iodine-123-N-omega-fluoropropyl-2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane SPECT in healthy controls and early-stage, drug naive Parkinson’s disease. J Nucl Med 1998;39:1143–1148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harissson RL, Haynor DR, Gillispie SB, Vannoy SD, Kaplan MS, Lewellen TK. A public-domain simulation system for emission tomography: photon tracking throught heterogeneous attenuation using importance sampling. J Nucl Med 1993;34:60PGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogawa K, Harata Y, Ichihara T, Kubo A, Hashimoto N. A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scattered correction in single photon emission. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:408–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tung c-H, Gullberg GT, Zeng GL, Christian PE, Datz FL, Morgan HT. Non-uniform attenuation correction using simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1992;39:1134–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J Nucl Med 1998;39:904–911PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barber R, McKeith I, Ballard C, O’Brien J. Volumetric MRI study of the caudate nucleus in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:406–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Almeida OP, Burton EJ, McKeith I, Gholkar A, Burn D, O’Brien J. MRI study of caudate nucleus volume in Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2003;16:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burton EJ, Karas G, Paling SM, Barber R, Williams ED, Ballard C et al. Patterns of cerebral atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies using voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2002;17:618–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cousins DA, Burton EJ, Burn D, Gholkar A, McKeith I, O’Brien J. Atrophy of the putamen in dementia with Lewy bodies but not Alzheimer’s disease: an MRI study. Neurology 2003;61:1191–1195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Donnemiller E, Heilmann J, Wenning GK, Berger W, Decristoforo C, Moncayo R et al. Brain perfusion scintigraphy with 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD and 123I-beta-CIT single-photon emission tomography in dementia of the Alzheimer-type and diffuse Lewy body disease. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:320–325PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marine Soret
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pierre Malick  Koulibaly
    • 3
  • Jacques Darcourt
    • 3
  • Irène Buvat
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR 678 INSERM - UPMC91 Boulevard de l’HôpitalParisFrance
  2. 2.Nuclear Medicine DepartmentHIA Val-de-Grâce,ParisFrance
  3. 3.Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Antoine LacassagneTIRO CEA – Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis,NiceFrance

Personalised recommendations