FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of combined fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with lymphoma, and to compare the FDG-PET/CT staging results with those of FDG-PET and CT alone. Twenty-seven patients were studied. Each patient had clinical follow-up for >12 months and entered complete follow-up evaluation. Patient-based evaluation showed a sensitivity of 78% for CT alone, 86% for FDG-PET alone, 93% for CT and FDG-PET read side by side, and 93% for combined FDG-PET/CT imaging. Region-based evaluation showed a sensitivity for regional lymph node involvement of 61%, 78%, 91% and 96% respectively. FDG-PET/CT imaging is superior to CT alone (P=0.02) and has additional benefit over FDG-PET alone due to exact anatomical localisation. We conclude that FDG-PET/CT imaging is accurate in re-staging lymphoma and offers advantages over separate FDG-PET and CT imaging.
Key wordsLymphoma Staging PET PET/CT FDG
The authors thank D. Porsch-Plottek and B. Terschüren for their assistance with the data acquisition.
- 3.Marshall WH Jr, Breiman RS, Harell GS, Glatstein E, Kaplan HS. Computed tomography of abdominal para-aortic lymph node disease: preliminary observation with a 6 second scanner. Am J Roentgenol 1977; 128:759–764.Google Scholar
- 7.Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, Hain SF, O’Doherty MJ. 18-FDG-PET for the assessment of residual masses on CT following treatment of lymphomas. Ann Oncol 2000; 11(Suppl 1):147–150.Google Scholar
- 10.de Wit M, Bumann D, Beyer W, Herbst K, Clausen M, Hossfeld DK. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) for diagnosis of residual mass in patients with lymphoma. Ann Oncol 1997; 8:57–60.Google Scholar
- 12.Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Maertens J, Bormans G, Thomas J, Balzarini J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Mortelmans L, Verhoef G. Prognostic value of pretransplant positron emission tomography using fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 102:53–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, Balzarini J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Mortelmans L, Verhoef G. Early restaging positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2002; 13:1356–1363.Google Scholar
- 20.Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Stattaus J, Jentzen W, Mueller SP, Debatin JF, Bockisch A. Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:1555–1560.Google Scholar
- 26.Naumann R, Vaic A, Beuthin-Baum B, Bredow J, Kropp J, Kittner T, Franke W, Ehnihger E. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of post-treatment residual mass in patients with Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2001; 115:793–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar