Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution
- 854 Downloads
The influence of the positron distance of flight in various human tissues on the spatial resolution in positron emission tomography (PET) was assessed for positrons from carbon-11, nitrogen-13, oxygen-15, fluorine-18, gallium-68 and rubidium-82. The investigation was performed using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE to simulate the transport of positrons within human compact bone, adipose, soft and lung tissue. The simulations yielded 3D distributions of annihilation origins that were projected on the image plane in order to assess their impact on PET spatial resolution. The distributions obtained were cusp-shaped with long tails rather than Gaussian shaped, thus making conventional full width at half maximum (FWHM) measures uncertain. The full width at 20% of the maximum amplitude (FW20M) of the annihilation distributions yielded more appropriate values for root mean square addition of spatial resolution loss components. Large differences in spatial resolution losses due to the positron flight in various human tissues were found for the selected radionuclides. The contribution to image blur was found to be up to three times larger in lung tissue than in soft tissue or fat and five times larger than in bone tissue. For 18F, the spatial resolution losses were 0.54 mm in soft tissue and 1.52 mm in lung tissue, compared with 4.10 and 10.5 mm, respectively, for 82Rb. With lung tissue as a possible exception, the image blur due to the positron flight in all human tissues has a minor impact as long as PET cameras with a spatial resolution of 5–7 mm are used in combination with 18F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. However, when ultra-high spatial resolution PET cameras, with 3–4 mm spatial resolution, are applied, especially in combination with other radionuclides, the positron flight may enter as a limiting factor for the total PET spatial resolution—particularly in lung tissue.
KeywordsPositron range Spatial resolution Annihilation PET Point spread function
We are grateful to Dr Stephen M. Seltzer from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA, for providing calculated beta energy spectra. This work was funded by the Karolinska Hospital FoUU of the Stockholm Country Council.
- 5.Moses WW, Virador PRG, Derenzo SE, Huesman RH, Budinger TF. Design of a High-resolution, high-sensitivity PET camera for human brains and small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997; NS-44:1487–1491.Google Scholar
- 6.Budinger TH. PET instrumentation: what are the limits? Semin Nucl Med 1998; 3:247–267.Google Scholar
- 7.Derenzo SE. Precision measurement of annihilation point distributions for medically important positron emitters. In: Positron annihilation. Sendai, Japan: The Japan Institute of Metals; 1979:819–823.Google Scholar
- 11.Baró J, Sempau J, Férnandez-Varea JM, Salvat F. PENELOPE: an algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter. Nucl Instrum Meth 1995; B100:31–46.Google Scholar
- 12.Sampau J, Acosta E, Baró J, Fernández-Varea JM, Salvat F. An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport. Nucl Instrum Meth 1997; B132:377–390.Google Scholar
- 13.Salvat F, Fernández-Varea JM, Acosta E, Sempau J. PENELOPE, a code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. OECD/NEA 5–7 November 2001, NEA/NSC/DOC(2001)19. ISBN: 92–64–18475–9Google Scholar
- 14.ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues. 1992: Report 46.Google Scholar
- 15.ICRP. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. ICRP Publication 23. New York: Pergamon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
- 17.Bielajew AF, Hirayama H, Nelson WR, Rogers DWO. History, overview and recent improvements of EGS4. Report NRCC/PIRS-0436, June 1994.Google Scholar