Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter

, Volume 99, Issue 3, pp 367–373 | Cite as

Hall effect and magnetoresistance in four-probe tight-binding mesoscopic rings

  • P. Gartner
  • A. Aldea
Original Contributions

Abstract

The Hall effect and magnetoresistance of a mesoscopic system having a four-probe ring geometry are calculated in a tight-binding model, either ordered or disordered, as function of magnetic flux and Fermi energy. The changes induced in the spectrum by the magnetic field affect differently the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) oscillating pattern of the two resistances: after the gap reaches the Fermi energy, the Hall effect remains bounded while the magnetoresistance increases exponentially with the sample size. The results are shown to depend significantly on the number and geometry of the probes.

PACS

05.60.+w 73.20Dx 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peeters, F.M.: Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 589 (1989); Akera, H., Ando, T: Phys. Rev. B39, 5508 (1989); Li, Q., Thouless, D.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 767 (1990); Chu, D.P., Butcher, P.N.: Phys. Rev. B47, 10008 (1993); Gagel, F., Maschke, K.: Phys. Rev. B49, 17170 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baranger, H.U., DiVincenzo, D.P., Jalabert, R.A., Douglas Stone, A.: Phys. Rev. B44, 10637 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sivan, U., Imry, Y., Hartzstein, C.: Phys. Rev. B39, 1242 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mani, R.G., von Klitzing, K.: Z. Phys. B92, 335 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beenaker, C.W.J., van Houten, H.: Solid State Physics, vol. 44, Ehrenreich, H., Turnbull, D. (eds). New York: Academic Press 1991Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douglas Stone, A., Szafer, A., McEuen, P.L., Jain, J.K.: Ann. of NY Acad. Sci.581, 21 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kucera, J., Streda, P.: J. Phys. C21, 4357 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Douglas Stone, A., Szafer, A.: IBM J. Res. Dev.32, 384 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baranger, H.U., Douglas Stone, A.: Phys. Rev. B40, 8169 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aldea, A., Gartner, P., Corcotoi, I.: Phys. Rev. B45, 14122 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Büttiker, M.: Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1761 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smrcka, L., Streda, P.: J. Phys. C10, 2153 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janssen, M.: Solid State Commun.79, 1073 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    indeed, a change in sign of cos δ is equivalent to changing λ+−λ and the results are the sameGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kivelson, S., Lee, D.H., Zhang, S.C.: Phys. Rev. B46, 2223 (1992); Ando, T.: Surf. Sci.170, 243 (1986); Viehweger, O.: Z. Phys. B-Condensed Matter83, 45 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frahm, K., Mühlschlegel, B.: Z. Phys. B94, 201 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Gartner
    • 1
  • A. Aldea
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physics and Technology of MaterialsBucharest-MagureleRomania

Personalised recommendations