Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fully automated rib fracture detection system on chest CT images and its impact on radiologist performance

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare rib fracture detection and classification by radiologists using CT images with and without a deep learning model.

Materials and methods

A total of 8529 chest CT images were collected from multiple hospitals for training the deep learning model. The test dataset included 300 chest CT images acquired using a single CT scanner. The rib fractures were marked in the bone window on each CT slice by experienced radiologists, and the ground truth included 861 rib fractures. We proposed a heterogeneous neural network for rib fracture detection and classification consisting of a cascaded feature pyramid network and a classification network. The deep learning-based model was evaluated based on the external testing data. The precision rate, recall rate, F1-score, and diagnostic time of two junior radiologists with and without the deep learning model were computed, and the Chi-square, one-way analysis of variance, and least significant difference tests were used to analyze the results.

Results

The use of the deep learning model increased detection recall and classification accuracy (0.922 and 0.863) compared with the radiologists alone (0.812 vs. 0.850). The radiologists achieved a higher precision rate, recall rate, and F1-score for fracture detection when using the deep learning model, at 0.943, 0.978, and 0.960, respectively. When using the deep learning model, the radiologist’s reading time was decreased from 158.3 ± 35.7 s to 42.3 ± 6.8 s.

Conclusion

Radiologists achieved the highest performance in diagnosing and classifying rib fractures on CT images when assisted by the deep learning model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton C, Barnett L, Trop A, Leininger B, Olson A, Brooks A, et al. Emergency department management of patients with rib fracture based on a clinical practice guideline. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2(1):e000133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shulzhenko NO, Zens TJ, Beems MV, Jung HS, O’Rourke AP, Liepert AE, et al. Number of rib fractures thresholds independently predict worse outcomes in older patients with blunt trauma. Surgery. 2017;161(4):1083–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marasco S, Lee G, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2015;46(1):61–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sano A. Rib radiography versus chest computed tomography in the diagnosis of rib fractures. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(8):693–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging, Henry TS, Donnelly EF, Boiselle PM, Crabtree TD, Iannettoni MD, et al. ACR appropriateness Criteria® rib fractures. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5S):S227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin FC, Li RY, Tung YW, Jeng KC, Tsai SC. Morbidity, mortality, associated injuries, and management of traumatic rib fractures. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(6):329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho SH, Sung YM, Kim MS. Missed rib fractures on evaluation of initial chest CT for trauma patients: pattern analysis and diagnostic value of coronal multiplanar reconstruction images with multidetector row CT. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1018):e845–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shelat VG, Eileen S, John L, Teo LT, Vijayan A, Chiu MT. Chronic pain and its impact on quality of life following a traumatic rib fracture. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38(4):451–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gyftopoulos S, Lin D, Knoll F, Doshi AM, Rodrigues TC, Recht MP. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(3):506–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Langerhuizen DWG, Janssen SJ, Mallee WH, van den Bekerom MPJ, Ring D, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, et al. What are the applications and limitations of artificial intelligence for fracture detection and classification in orthopaedic trauma imaging? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(11):2482–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitamura G, Chung CY, Moore BE. Ankle fracture detection utilizing a convolutional neural network ensemble implemented with a small sample, de novo training, and multiview incorporation. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32(4):672–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, Razavian AS, Jilert A, Stark A, et al. Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(6):581–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pranata YD, Wang KC, Wang JC, Idram I, Lai JY, Liu JW, et al. Deep learning and SURF for automated classification and detection of calcaneus fractures in CT images. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2019;171:27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi S-A. V-net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation; 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). 2016. p. 565–71.

  15. He K, Zhang X, Ren S. Deep residual learning for image recognition//IEEE conference on computer vision & pattern recognition. IEEE Computer Society; 2016.

  16. Zhou QQ, Wang J, Tang W, Hu ZC, Xia ZY, Li XS, et al. Automatic detection and classification of rib fractures on thoracic CT using convolutional neural network: accuracy and feasibility. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(7):869–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weikert T, Noordtzij LA, Bremerich J, Stieltjes B, Parmar V, Cyriac J, et al. Assessment of a deep learning algorithm for the detection of rib fractures on whole-body trauma computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(7):891–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gan K, Xu D, Lin Y, Shen Y, Zhang T, Hu K, et al. Artificial intelligence detection of distal radius fractures: a comparison between the convolutional neural network and professional assessments. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(4):394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urakawa T, Tanaka Y, Goto S, Matsuzawa H, Watanabe K, Endo N. Detecting intertrochanteric hip fractures with orthopedist-level accuracy using a deep convolutional neural network. Skelet Radiol. 2019;48(2):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu JS, Yu SM, Erdal BS, Demirer M, Gupta V, Bigelow M, et al. Detection and localisation of hip fractures on anteroposterior radiographs with artificial intelligence: proof of concept. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(3):237.e1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim DH, MacKinnon T. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(5):439–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung SW, Han SS, Lee JW, Oh KS, Kim NR, Yoon JP, et al. Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(4):468–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomita N, Cheung YY, Hassanpour S. Deep neural networks for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans. Comput Biol Med. 2018;98:8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ringl H, Lazar M, Töpker M, Woitek R, Prosch H, Asenbaum U, et al. The ribs unfolded - a CT visualization algorithm for fast detection of rib fractures: effect on sensitivity and specificity in trauma patients. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(7):1865–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Urbaneja A, De Verbizier J, Formery AS, Tobon-Gomez C, Nace L, Blum A, et al. Automatic rib cage unfolding with CT cylindrical projection reformat in polytraumatized patients for rib fracture detection and characterization: feasibility and clinical application. Eur J Radiol. 2019;110:121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Boehm T. Accuracy and time efficiency for the detection of thoracic cage fractures: volume rendering compared with transverse computed tomography images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28(3):378–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This study was funded by Chinas Postdoctoral Science Foundation general program second-class funding (grant number 2019M651053).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Long Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, X.H., Wu, D.J., Wang, Z. et al. A fully automated rib fracture detection system on chest CT images and its impact on radiologist performance. Skeletal Radiol 50, 1821–1828 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03709-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03709-8

Keywords

Navigation