Advertisement

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of tears and instability of proximal long head of biceps tendon: an evaluation of 100 shoulders compared with arthroscopy

  • Eduardo BaptistaEmail author
  • Eduardo A. Malavolta
  • Mauro E. C. Gracitelli
  • Daniel Alvarenga
  • Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues
  • Arnaldo A. Ferreira Neto
  • Nestor de Barros
Scientific Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of instability and tears of the proximal long head of biceps tendon (LHBT). To assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive shoulders who underwent non-contrast 1.5-T MRI prior to arthroscopic surgery due to rotator cuff injury. Images were independently analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. LHBT was evaluated for presence of tearing (intact, longitudinal split, partial-thickness, or full-thickness) and position (normal, subluxated, and dislocated). Anterosuperior rotator cuff tears were also assessed. The reference standard was arthroscopic surgery. The ramp test was performed in order to evaluate LHBT stability. Diagnostic performance measures were determined and Kappa coefficients assessed agreement.

Results

Concerning the detection of overall tears, sensitivity ranged from 71 to 73% and specificity was 73%. The specificity for full-thickness tears ranged from 75 to 96%. Overall displacement showed sensitivity ranging from 51 to 58% and specificity ranging from 70 to 86%. The specificity of overall displacement combined with anterosuperior rotator cuff tears ranged from 73 to 91%. Interobserver Kappa values were between 0.59 and 0.69. Intraobserver Kappa values were between 0.74 and 0.82.

Conclusions

MRI has moderate accuracy and good agreement for detection of LHBT tears and instability. There is a tendency for increased specificity for full-thickness tears and for instability in the coexistence of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Keywords

MRI Long head of biceps tendon Tendon tears Instability Diagnostic accuracy 

Abbreviations

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

LHBT

Long head of biceps tendon

MRA

Magnetic resonance arthrography

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 43685 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Watson ST, Robbins CB, Bedi A, Carpenter JE, Gagnier JJ, Miller BS. Comparison of outcomes 1 year after rotator cuff repair with and without concomitant biceps surgery. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1928–36.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alpantaki K. Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87:1580–3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ, Adkins MC, Emery RL, Jones TP, et al. Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams GR. Painful shoulder after rotator cuff surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89:1001–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilmer BB, DeMers AM, Guerrero D, Reid JB, Lubowitz JH, Guttmann D. Arthroscopic versus open comparison of long head of biceps tendon visualization and pathology in patients requiring tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holtby R, Razmjou H. Accuracy of the Speed’s and Yergason’s tests in detecting biceps pathology and SLAP lesions: comparison with arthroscopic findings. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Creech MJ, Yeung M, Denkers M, Simunovic N, Athwal GS, Ayeni OR. Surgical indications for long head biceps tenodesis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morag Y, Bedi A, Jamadar DA. The rotator interval and long head biceps tendon: anatomy, function, pathology, and magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2012;20:229–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tuckman GA. Abnormalities of the long head of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:1183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee RW, Choi SJ, Lee MH, Ahn JH, Shin DR, Kang CH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3T conventional shoulder MRI in the detection of the long head of the biceps tendon tears associated with rotator cuff tendon tears. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:1705–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borrero CG, Costello J, Bertolet M, Vyas D. Effect of patient age on accuracy of primary MRI signs of long head of biceps tearing and instability in the shoulder: an MRI-arthroscopy correlation study. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Maeseneer M, Boulet C, Pouliart N, Kichouh M, Buls N, Verhelle F, et al. Assessment of the long head of the biceps tendon of the shoulder with 3T magnetic resonance arthrography and CT arthrography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:934–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Razmjou H, Fournier-Gosselin S, Christakis M, Pennings A, ElMaraghy A, Holtby R. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting biceps pathology in patients with rotator cuff disorders: comparison with arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omoumi P, Bafort A-C, Dubuc J-E, Malghem J, Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE. Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography. Radiology. 2012;264:812–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, et al. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004;13:258–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tadros AS, Huang BK, Wymore L, Hoenecke H, Fronek J, Chang EY. Long head of the biceps brachii tendon: unenhanced MRI versus direct MR arthrography. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44:1263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dubrow SA, Streit JJ, Shishani Y, Robbin MR, Gobezie R. Diagnostic accuracy in detecting tears in the proximal biceps tendon using standard nonenhancing shoulder MRI. Open Access J Sports Med. 2014;5:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J. Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1557–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malavolta EA, Assunção JH, Guglielmetti CLB, de Souza FF, Gracitelli MEC, Ferreira Neto AA. Accuracy of preoperative MRI in the diagnosis of disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Houtz CG, Schwartzberg RS, Barry JA, Reuss BL, Papa L. Shoulder MRI accuracy in the community setting. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:537–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oku EC, Andrade AP, Stadiniky SP, Carrera EF, Tellini GG. Tradução e adaptação cultural do modified-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale para a língua Portuguesa. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2006;46:246–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knaut L, Moser AD, Melo SDA, Richards RR. Tradução e adaptação cultural à língua portuguesa do American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) para avaliação da função do ombro. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2010;50:176–83.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaskin CM, Anderson MW, Choudhri A, Diduch DR. Focal partial tears of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon at the entrance to the bicipital groove: MR imaging findings, surgical correlation, and clinical significance. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38:959–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CWA, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Degeneration of the long biceps tendon: comparison of MRI with gross anatomy and histology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamaguchi K, Bindra R. Disorders of the biceps tendon. In: Iannott JP, Willians G, Miniaci A, Zuckerman J, editors. Disorders of the shoulder: diagnosis and management. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willians and Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Levigne C, Renaud E. Tears of the supraspinatus tendon associated with “hidden” lesions of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1994;3:353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spritzer CE, Collins AJ, Cooperman A, Speer KP. Assessment of instability of the long head of the biceps tendon by MRI. Skelet Radiol. 2001;30:199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Habermeyer P. Rotatorenintervall und lange bizepssehne. Rotatorenmanschette. Munchen: Jena, Urban and Ficher; 2002. p. 333–74.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Festa A, Allert J, Issa K, Tasto JP, Myer JJ. Visualization of the extra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon during intra-articular shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1413–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Motley GS, Osbahr DC, Holovac TF, Speer KP. An arthroscopic technique for confirming intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon: the ramp test. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Landis JRL, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Braun S, Horan MP, Elser F, Millett PJ. Lesions of the biceps pulley. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:790–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baumann B, Genning K, Böhm D, Rolf O, Gohlke F. Arthroscopic prevalence of pulley lesions in 1007 consecutive patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kang Y, Lee JW, Ahn JM, Lee E, Kang HS. Instability of the long head of the biceps tendon in patients with rotator cuff tear: evaluation on magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46:1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Tanner A, Gerber C, Hodler J. Lesions of the reflection pulley of the long biceps tendon. MR arthrographic findings. Investig Radiol. 1999;34:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jung JY, Yoon YC, Yi SK, Yoo J, Choe BK. Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38:659–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Skendzel JG, Jacobson JA, Carpenter JE, Miller BS. Long head of biceps brachii tendon evaluation: accuracy of preoperative ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:942–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bennett WF. Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith TO, Daniell H, Geere J, Toms AP, Hing CB. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the detection of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in adults. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:336–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    De Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1701–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taylor SA, Khair MM, Gulotta LV, Pearle AD, Baret NJ, Newman AM, et al. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Ma B, Wright RW, Jones G, Spencer EE, et al. Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Rv J, Nca H, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;24(9):CD009020.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Baptista
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eduardo A. Malavolta
    • 2
  • Mauro E. C. Gracitelli
    • 2
  • Daniel Alvarenga
    • 1
  • Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Arnaldo A. Ferreira Neto
    • 2
  • Nestor de Barros
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Oncology, School of MedicineUniversity of São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, School of MedicineUniversity of São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations