Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of tears and instability of proximal long head of biceps tendon: an evaluation of 100 shoulders compared with arthroscopy
- 80 Downloads
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of instability and tears of the proximal long head of biceps tendon (LHBT). To assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement.
Materials and methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive shoulders who underwent non-contrast 1.5-T MRI prior to arthroscopic surgery due to rotator cuff injury. Images were independently analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. LHBT was evaluated for presence of tearing (intact, longitudinal split, partial-thickness, or full-thickness) and position (normal, subluxated, and dislocated). Anterosuperior rotator cuff tears were also assessed. The reference standard was arthroscopic surgery. The ramp test was performed in order to evaluate LHBT stability. Diagnostic performance measures were determined and Kappa coefficients assessed agreement.
Concerning the detection of overall tears, sensitivity ranged from 71 to 73% and specificity was 73%. The specificity for full-thickness tears ranged from 75 to 96%. Overall displacement showed sensitivity ranging from 51 to 58% and specificity ranging from 70 to 86%. The specificity of overall displacement combined with anterosuperior rotator cuff tears ranged from 73 to 91%. Interobserver Kappa values were between 0.59 and 0.69. Intraobserver Kappa values were between 0.74 and 0.82.
MRI has moderate accuracy and good agreement for detection of LHBT tears and instability. There is a tendency for increased specificity for full-thickness tears and for instability in the coexistence of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.
KeywordsMRI Long head of biceps tendon Tendon tears Instability Diagnostic accuracy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Long head of biceps tendon
Magnetic resonance arthrography
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
(MP4 43685 kb)
- 1.Watson ST, Robbins CB, Bedi A, Carpenter JE, Gagnier JJ, Miller BS. Comparison of outcomes 1 year after rotator cuff repair with and without concomitant biceps surgery. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1928–36.Google Scholar
- 2.Alpantaki K. Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87:1580–3.Google Scholar
- 23.Knaut L, Moser AD, Melo SDA, Richards RR. Tradução e adaptação cultural à língua portuguesa do American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) para avaliação da função do ombro. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2010;50:176–83.Google Scholar
- 26.Yamaguchi K, Bindra R. Disorders of the biceps tendon. In: Iannott JP, Willians G, Miniaci A, Zuckerman J, editors. Disorders of the shoulder: diagnosis and management. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willians and Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Habermeyer P. Rotatorenintervall und lange bizepssehne. Rotatorenmanschette. Munchen: Jena, Urban and Ficher; 2002. p. 333–74.Google Scholar
- 44.Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Rv J, Nca H, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;24(9):CD009020.Google Scholar