Advertisement

Preliminary validation of the Simplified Psoriatic Arthritis Radiographic Score (SPARS)

  • Fausto Salaffi
  • Marina Carotti
  • Eleonora Di Donato
  • Marco Di Carlo
  • Michele Maria Luchetti
  • Luca Ceccarelli
  • Andrea Giovagnoni
Scientific Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate in a preliminary way a novel radiographic scoring system for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), called Simplified Psoriatic Arthritis Radiographic Score (SPARS).

Materials and methods

Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained from consecutive PsA patients and assessed by two readers. For each joint (30 joints in the hands, ten joints in the feet), the combination of the erosions, joint narrowing space (JNS) and bony proliferation (BP) has been assessed, giving a value of 1 for erosions presence, 1 for JNS presence, and 1 for BP presence (SPARS score range, 0–120). Reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the readings. To determine the convergent validity, SPARS was compared to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde Score (mSvdHS) and to the Ratingen scoring system (PARS).

Results

One-hundred and five hands and feet radiographs have been assessed. The inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent (inter-rater reliability 0.934, and intra-rater reliability for both readers 0.845 and 0.876). The SDD for the average SPARS scores of the two readers was 8.0. SPARS correlated strongly with mSvdHS (r = 0.926; p < 0.0001), and PARS (r = 0.904; p < 0.0001). The mean time to score each of the mSvdHS, PARS, and SPARS was 14.4, 10.1, and 4.5 min, respectively.

Conclusions

The SPARS properties are close to those of the mSvdHS and PARS and is quicker to calculate.

Keywords

Psoriatic arthritis Radiography Diagnostic imaging 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

FS, MC, and AG contributed to the study design. FS, MC, EDD, MDC, MML, and LC performed the data collection. FS, MC, and MDC were involved in data analysis and in the interpretation of the results. FS, EDD, and MDC drafted the manuscript. All authors were involved in revising the article, and all authors approved the final version submitted for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lapadula G, Marchesoni A, Salaffi F, Ramonda R, Salvarani C, Punzi L, et al. Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis: results by Italian DElphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA). Reumatismo. 2016;68(3):126–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Carlo M, Becciolini A, Lato V, Crotti C, Favalli EG, Salaffi F. The 12-item psoriatic arthritis Impact of disease questionnaire: construct validity, reliability, and interpretability in a clinical setting. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(3):279–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day MS, Nam D, Goodman S, Su EP, Figgie M. Psoriatic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(1):28–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Offidani A, Cellini A, Valeri G, Giovagnoni A. Subclinical joint involvement in psoriasis: magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray findings. Acta Derm Venereol. 1998;78(6):463–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ory PA, Gladman DD, Mease PJ. Psoriatic arthritis and imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii55–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Strand V, Healy P, Helliwell PS, Fitzgerald O, et al. Consensus on a core set of domains for psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(5):1167–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahmood F, Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Current concepts and unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37(2):297–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, Feldman SR, Lebwohl M, Koo JY, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):851–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Heijde DM, van Leeuwen MA, van Riel PL, Koster AM, van’t Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, et al. Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective follow-up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(1):26–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman P, Glaman DD, Cook RJ, Zhou Y, Young G, Salonen D. Radiological assessment in psoriatic arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(7):760–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wassenberg S, Fischer-Kahle V, Herborn G, Rau R. A method to score radiographic change in psoriatic arthritis. Z Rheumatol. 2001;60(3):156–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzgerald O, Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ. Biomarkers of radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis: a report from the GRAPPA 2011 annual meeting. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(11):2189–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):261–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharp JT, Bluhm GB, Brook A, Brower AC, Corbett M, Decker JL, et al. Reproducibility of multiple-observer scoring of radiologic abnormalities in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28(1):16–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Heijde D, Sharp J, Wassenberg S, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis imaging: a review of scoring methods. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii61–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Heijde D. Quantification of radiological damage in inflammatory arthritis: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18(6):847–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kavanaugh A, Antoni CE, Gladman D, Wassenberg S, Zhou B, Beutler A, et al. The infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(8):1038–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Krueger GG, Gladman DD, van der Heijde D, et al. Clinical efficacy, radiographic and safety findings through 2 years of golimumab treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from a long-term extension of the randomised, placebo-controlled GO-REVEAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1777–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Heijde D, Dankert T, Nieman F, Rau R, Boers M. Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 1999;38(10):941–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lassere M, Boers M, van der Heijde D, Boonen A, Edmonds J, Saudan A, et al. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(3):731–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bruynesteyn K, van der Heijde D, Boers M, Lassere M, Boonen A, Edmonds J, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):904–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mader R, Gladman DD, Long J, Gough J, Farewell VT. Does injectable gold retard radiologic evidence of joint damage in psoriatic arthritis? Clin Invest Med. 1995;18(2):139–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abu-Shakra M, Gladman DD, Thorne JC, Long J, Gough J, Farewell VT. Long-term methotrexate therapy in psoriatic arthritis: clinical and radiologic outcome. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(2):241–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahman P, Gladman DD, Cook RJ, Zhou Y, Young G. The use of sulfasalazine in psoriatic arthritis: a clinic experience. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(10):1957–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee JC, Gladman DD, Schentag CT, Cook RJ. The long-term use of azathioprine in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2001;7(3):160–5.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rau R, Wassenberg S, Herborn G, Stuki G. Gebler A. A new method of scoring radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(11):2094–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ostergaard M, McQueen F, Wiell C, Bird P, Bøyesen P, Ejbjerg B, et al. The OMERACT psoriatic arthritis magnetic resonance imaging scoring system (PsAMRIS): definitions of key pathologies, suggested MRI sequences, and preliminary scoring system for PsA hands. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(8):1816–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rau R, Herborn G. A modified version of Larsen’s scoring method to assess radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(10):1976–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tillett W, Jadon D, Shaddick G, Robinson G, Sengupta R, Korendowych E, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of four radiographic scoring methods in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(2):311–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van der Heijde D, Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD, Antoni C, Krueger GG, Guzzo C, et al. Infliximab inhibits progression of radiographic damage in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through one year of treatment: results from the induction and maintenance psoriatic arthritis clinical trial 2. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(8):2698–707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT, Ruderman EM, Steinfeld SD, Choy EH, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3279–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Choy EH, Sharp JT, Ory PA, et al. Adalimumab for long-term treatment of psoriatic arthritis: forty-eight week data from the adalimumab effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(2):476–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geijer M, Lindqvist U, Husmark T, Alenius GM, Larsson PT, Teleman A, et al. The Swedish early psoriatic arthritis registry 5-year follow-up: substantial radiographic progression mainly in men with high disease activity and development of dactylitis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(11):2110–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kerschbaumer A, Baker D, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. The effects of structural damage on functional disability in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):2038–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ravindran J, Cavill C, Balakrishnan C, Jones SM, Korendowych E, McHugh NJ. A modified Sharp score demonstrates disease progression in established psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(1):86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Husted JA, Tom BD, Farewell VT, Schentag CT, Gladman DD. A longitudinal study of the effect of disease activity and clinical damage on physical function over the course of psoriatic arthritis: does the effect change over time? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(3):840–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aletaha D, Funovits J, Smolen JS. Physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with cartilage damage rather than bone destruction. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):733–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tillett W, Shaddick G, Jadon D, Robinson G, Korendowych E, McHugh N. Novel composite radiographic score for longitudinal observational studies of psoriatic arthritis: a proof-of-concept study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(2):367–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ejbjerg BJ, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(8):2300–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rheumatological ClinicUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, “Carlo Urbani” HospitalJesiItaly
  2. 2.Radiology DepartmentUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  3. 3.Medical ClinicUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations