Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 187–189 | Cite as

Highlights of the special scientific sessions of the 45th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Skeletal Society (ISS) 2018, Berlin, Germany

  • Miriam A. Bredella
Meeting Highlights
  • 92 Downloads

Introduction

The 45th Annual Meeting of the International Skeletal Society (ISS) was held in Berlin, Germany, from September 23 to September 28, 2018. The meeting consisted of a 3-day closed meeting for ISS members and a 4-day refresher course, which included a 1-day dedicated musculoskeletal ultrasound course. This article will review the highlights of the Scientific Sessions, which are part of the closed meeting.

Scientific program

This year, 109 scientific abstract submissions were received, of which 20 were selected for a 10-min oral presentation in the Special Scientific Session. The winners of the best scientific paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR), the Asian Musculoskeletal Society (AMS), and the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) also presented their winning papers during the Special Scientific Session. For the Scientific Breakout Session, ten abstracts were selected for a 6-min oral presentation. The abstracts for the Special Scientific Session...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts of the International Skeletal Society (ISS) 2018, Berlin, Germany. Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 47:1315–1325.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lim J, Jee W-H, Lee SK, Jung J-Y, Ie-RyungYoo J-PM, Kang JH, et al. Bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: assessment of early treatment response to target therapy with 3T multiparametric MR imaging. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shannon BA, Ahlawat S, Morris CD, Levin AS, Fayad LM. Do contrast-enhanced sequences and functional MRI sequences improve diagnostic accuracy in the spectrum of lipomatous tumors? Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Louza ICF, Bastos BB, Leão RV, Helito CP, Helito PVP, Rodrigues MB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the normal knee anterolateral ligament in children and adolescents. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1316.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khanna M, Gupte C, Dodds A, Williams A, Walker M. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the capsulo-osseous layer of the iliotibial band and femoral attachments of the iliotibial band in the Normal and pivot shift ACL injured knee. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1317.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guimaraes JB, Neumann J, Facchetti L, Gersing A, Schwaiger B, Link T. Meniscal ramp lesions: frequency, natural history and the effect on knee cartilage over 24 months in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament tear. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1318.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mckean D, Brooks R, Zishan US, Coventry L, Papanikitas J, Yanny S, et al. Shoulder manipulation following targeted ultrasound-guided rotator interval block for adhesive capsulitis. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1316.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boutin RD, Roller B, Cunningham XB, Tan J, Lenchik L. Sarcopenia on abdominal CT exams: comparison of muscle metrics on clinical PACS versus specialized segmentation software. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1317.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rehwald C, Cunningham SX, Ng S, Hippe DS, Ha AS. Novel advanced reconstruction methods for digital tomosynthesis in MSK imaging: a pilot study to assess user preferences. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1318.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Lian K, Kambhampati S, Kanarek A, Larison W, et al. Fully-automated knee cartilage lesion detection using deep learning. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1319.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chhabra A. Radiomics (machine learning) versus expert radiologist interpretations of musculoskeletal tumors- who outperforms the other? Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1319.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huber FA, Stutz S, De Martini IV, Becker A, Burgstaller JM, Winklhofer S, et al. Performance of machine-learning for central lumbar spinal stenosis detection and grading. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1319.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang B, Tsao A, Torriani M. Automatic classification of orthopedic hardware using a deep learning algorithm. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mutasa S, Varada S, Goel A, Wong T, Rasiej M. Automated femoral neck fracture detection and classification utilizing advanced deep learning technique. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1320.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walter WR, Samim MM, Portugal S, Babb JS, Burke CJ. Continuous radial gradient-echo (GRE) and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo imaging (HASTE) in flexion-extension spine MRI: comparison of both techniques with radiographs in the lumbar and cervical spine. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zishan US, Siddiqi S, Lattimer N, Coventry L, Papanikitas J, Yanny S, et al. Dynamic 4D CT of the spine for assessment of cervical instability. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1321.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pattamapaspong N, Kanthawang T, Singsuwan P, Sansiri W, Prasitwattanaseree S, Mahakkanukrauh P. Effectiveness of three-dimensional cinematic rendering computed tomography images in demonstrating features related to age estimation in pelvic bones. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1322.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tornow K, Thropp R, Moore D, Zerr J, Chhabra A. Reducing the number of knee MRIs in patients with severe degenerative changes. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1322.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lapègue F, André A, Pasquier-Bernachot E, Sans N, Faruch-Bilfeld M. US-guided percutaneous “surgery” of stenosing tenosynovitis in the hand using a 21 G needle: a prospective study of 340 cases. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1323.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lala S, Petchprapa CN. How common is lunotriquetral pathology in VISI? A plain radiographic study. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1323.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Albano D, Cannavò L, Corazza A, Messina C, Scotto G, Perrucchini G, et al. Accuracy of MRI and CT to evaluate resection margins in primary malignant bone tumors having histology as reference standard. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bousson V, Leturcq T, Ea H-K, Hauger O, Mehsen-Cetre N, Hamzé B, et al. An open-label, prospective, observational study of the efficacy of bisphosphonate therapy for painful osteoid osteoma. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1324.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Del Grande F, Delcogliano M, Raithel E, Stern SE, Papp DF, Candrian C, et al. One-button-push 10-min 3D MRI of the knee: preliminary results of a multi-center validation study. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:1324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations