Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 79–84 | Cite as

Southwick angle measurements and SCFE slip severity classifications are affected by frog-lateral positioning

  • Carly E. Jones
  • Anthony P. Cooper
  • Jonathan Doucette
  • Lawrence L. Buchan
  • David R. Wilson
  • Kishore Mulpuri
  • Agnes G. d’Entremont
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a hip disorder where the femoral head slips relative to the neck at the physis. Appropriate treatment of SCFE depends on the severity of the slip, commonly categorised using the Southwick (SW) angle. The SW angle is measured in the frog-lateral leg position, which can be painful and potentially unattainable for patients. The purpose of this study is to determine how errors in frog-lateral radiograph positioning affect measured SW angles and slip classifications.

Methods

Models of SCFE hips were produced from one CT scan of a normal hip; 360 deformities were created. SW angles were measured from a simulated frog-lateral position. Femoral lateral head-neck angles (LHNA; equivalent to SW in incorrect frog-lateral plane) were measured over a range of 837 incorrect frog-lateral leg positions with positioning errors in flexion and/or internal/external rotation.

Results

Seventy-six per cent of all imaging position-deformity combinations had error in the reported angle (>1° difference between LHNA and SW). Of those, 70% had <5°, 24% had 5° to 10°, and 6% had >10° of error from the actual SW angle. Three per cent of LHNAs that had >10° error resulted from <10° of positioning error.

Conclusions

If the patient is limited in flexion or external rotation, more diagnostic testing should be considered if error in the reported slip measurement would affect treatment decisions or if accurate severity classification is needed for research. Small positioning errors in moderate and severe slips can cause a > 10° LHNA error; additional three-dimensional imaging should be considered.

Keywords

SCFE Slipped capital femoral epiphysis Southwick Computer modelling Hip Paediatric Juvenile Rare disease Radiographic measures 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Microgrant from the Rare Disease Foundation and an Undergraduate Student Research Award from Engineers in Scrubs.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics board approval was obtained from our institution for this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu GS, Pollock AN. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(11):1095–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gholve PA, Cameron DB, Millis MB. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novais EN, Millis MB. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(12):3432–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manoff EM, Banffy MB, Winell JJ. Relationship between body mass index and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(6):744–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abraham E, Gonzalez MH, Pratap S, Amirouche F, Atluri P, Simon P. Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(7):788–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sonnega RJA, van der Sluijs JA, Wainwright AM, Roposch A, Hefti F. Management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: results of a survey of the members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic society. J Child Orthop. Dec. 2011;5(6):433–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jarrett DY, Matheney T, Kleinman PK. Imaging SCFE: diagnosis, treatment and complications. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(Suppl 1):S71–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westhoff B, Ruhe K, Weimann-Stahlschmidt K, Zilkens C, Willers R, Krauspe R. The gait function of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in patients after growth arrest and its correlation with the clinical outcome. Int Orthop. May 2012;36(5):1031–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loder RT. Controversies in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2006;37:211–221.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones CE, Cooper AP, Doucette J, Buchan LL, Wilson DR, Mulpuri K, d’Entremont AG. ​Relationships Between Severity of Deformity and Impingement in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;91(5):360–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao KN, Joseph B. Value of measurement of hip movements in childhood hip disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(4):495–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehmann TG, Vetti N, Laborie LB, Engesæter IØ, Engesæter LB, Rosendahl K. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability of radiographic measurements for previously slipped capital femoral epiphysis at skeletal maturity. Acta Radiologica. 2014;(5):587–591.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(6):736–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carly E. Jones
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anthony P. Cooper
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jonathan Doucette
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lawrence L. Buchan
    • 1
    • 5
  • David R. Wilson
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kishore Mulpuri
    • 3
    • 4
  • Agnes G. d’Entremont
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Hip Health and MobilityVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Engineering PhysicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.BC Children’s HospitalVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations