Magnetic resonance cinematography of the fingers: a 3.0 Tesla feasibility study with comparison of incremental and continuous dynamic protocols
- 257 Downloads
To study the feasibility of magnetic resonance cinematography of the fingers (MRCF) with comparison of image quality of different protocols for depicting the finger anatomy during motion.
Materials and methods
MRCF was performed during a full flexion and extension movement in 14 healthy volunteers using a finger-gating device. Three real-time sequences (frame rates 17–59 images/min) and one proton density (PD) sequence (3 images/min) were acquired during incremental and continuous motion. Analyses were performed independently by three readers. Qualitative image analysis included Likert-scale grading from 0 (useless) to 5 (excellent) and specific visual analog scale (VAS) grading from 0 (insufficient) to 100 (excellent). Signal-to-noise calculation was performed. Overall percentage agreement and mean absolute disagreement were calculated.
Within the real-time sequences a high frame-rate true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (TRUFI) yielded the best image quality with Likert and overall VAS scores of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 60.4 ± 25.3, respectively. The best sequence regarding image quality was an incremental PD with mean values of 4.8 ± 0.2 and 91.2 ± 9.4, respectively. Overall percentage agreement and mean absolute disagreement were 47.9 and 0.7, respectively. No statistically significant SNR differences were found between continuous and incremental motion for the real-time protocols.
MRCF is feasible with appropriate image quality during continuous motion using a finger-gating device. Almost perfect image quality is achievable with incremental PD imaging, which represents a compromise for MRCF with the drawback of prolonged scanning time.
KeywordsCinematography MRI Finger Volar plate Pulley rupture
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
(M4V 1383 kb)
(M4V 5917 kb)
(M4V 9296 kb)
(M4V 2081 kb)
(M4V 1024 kb)
(M4V 2588 kb)
(M4V 2305 kb)
- 6.Nordmeyer-Massner JA, Pruessmann KP, Wyss M, Manoliu A, Hodler J, Andreisek G, et al. MR imaging of healthy knees in varying degrees of flexion using a stretchable coil array provides comparable image quality compared to a standard knee coil array. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(3):518–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Lasalarie JC, Serfaty JM, Carre C, Messika-Zeitoun D, Jeannot C, Schouman-Claeys E, et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced cine-MR sequences in the assessment of left ventricular function: comparison with precontrast cine-MR sequences. Results of a bicentric study. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(11):2838–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar