Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 759–767 | Cite as

Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout in patients presenting with acute arthritis

  • Nuttaya PattamapaspongEmail author
  • Withawat Vuthiwong
  • Thanat Kanthawang
  • Worawit Louthrenoo
Scientific Article



To evaluate the value of ultrasonographic features of crystal deposition for diagnosing gout in patients presenting with acute arthritis.

Materials and methods

Ultrasound scanning of the most inflamed joint was performed on 89 consecutively enrolled patients with acute arthritis. Two radiologists independently reviewed the ultrasound images, and a consensus was achieved with a third radiologist when the interpretations of four key ultrasound features of gout differed. Arthrocentesis and crystal analysis using compensated polarized light microscopy of aspirates are considered the gold standards for gout diagnosis.


Fifty-three (60%) patients had gout, whereas the remaining 36 (40%) had non-gout arthritis. The mean serum uric acid level was 7.1 mg/dl in patients with gout and 4.7 mg/dl in patients with non-gout arthritis. Three US features differed significantly (p < 0.001) between patients with gout and non-gout arthritis: the double contour sign (42 vs. 8%, respectively), intra-articular aggregates (58 vs. 8%), and tophi (40 vs. 0%). No statistically significant differences in detecting intra-tendinous aggregates (32 vs. 17%, p = 0.14) were observed. The sensitivity and specificity of the double contour sign were 42 and 92%, respectively; those of the intra-articular aggregates were 58 and 92%; and those of tophi were 40 and 100%. The positive predictive values for these three features ranged from 88 to 100%, whereas the negative predictive values ranged from 52 to 60%.


When the prevalence is high, these three ultrasound features may be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of acute gout, particularly when specialized microscopic techniques are not available.


Gout Uric acid Arthritis Ultrasonography 



We are grateful to Professor Bruce G. Weniger for offering editorial and technical advice and to Dr. Kanon Jatuworapruk for providing the patient clinical data.

Compliance with ethical standards

This investigational protocol was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding source



  1. 1.
    Richette P, Bardin T. Gout Lancet. 2010;375(9711):318–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlesinger N, Baker DG, Schumacher Jr HR. Serum urate during bouts of acute gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(11):2265–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutierrez M, Schmidt WA, Thiele RG, Keen HI, Kaeley GS, Naredo E, et al. International consensus for ultrasound lesions in gout: results of Delphi process and web-reliability exercise. Rheumatology. 2015;54(10):1797–805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fodor D, Nestorova R, Vlad V, Micu M. The place of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in gout diagnosis. Med Ultrason. 2014;16(4):336–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Girish G, Melville DM, Kaeley GS, Brandon CJ, Goyal JR, Jacobson JA, et al. Imaging appearances in gout. Arthritis. 2013;2013:673401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ottaviani S, Bardin T, Richette P. Usefulness of ultrasonography for gout. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(5):441–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jatuworapruk K, Lhakum P, Pattamapaspong N, Kasitanon N, Wangkaew S, Louthrenoo W. Performance of the existing classification criteria for gout in Thai patients presenting with acute arthritis. Medicine. 2016;95(5):e2730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor WJ, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Schumacher HR, Brown M, et al. Study for updated gout classification criteria: identification of features to classify gout. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(9):1304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melzer R, Pauli C, Treumann T, Krauss B. Gout tophus detection-a comparison of dual-energy CT (DECT) and histology. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43(5):662–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pineda C, Fuentes-Gomez AJ, Hernandez-Diaz C, Zamudio-Cuevas Y, Fernandez-Torres J, Lopez-Macay A, et al. Animal model of acute gout reproduces the inflammatory and ultrasonographic joint changes of human gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taljanovic MS, Melville DM, Gimber LH, Scalcione LR, Miller MD, Kwoh CK, et al. High-resolution US of rheumatologic diseases. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):2026–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rettenbacher T, Ennemoser S, Weirich H, Ulmer H, Hartig F, Klotz W, et al. Diagnostic imaging of gout: comparison of high-resolution US versus conventional X-ray. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(3):621–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology. 2007;46(7):1116–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wright SA, Filippucci E, McVeigh C, Grey A, McCarron M, Grassi W, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint in gout: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):859–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Miguel E, Puig JG, Castillo C, Peiteado D, Torres RJ, Martin-Mola E. Diagnosis of gout in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a pilot ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(1):157–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filippucci E, Scire CA, Delle Sedie A, Iagnocco A, Riente L, Meenagh G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XXV. Sonographic assessment of the knee in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(1):2–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernandes EA, Lopes MG, Mitraud SA, Ferrari AJ, Fernandes AR. Ultrasound characteristics of gouty tophi in the olecranon bursa and evaluation of their reproducibility. Eur Radiol. 2012;81(2):317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naredo E, Uson J, Jimenez-Palop M, Martinez A, Vicente E, Brito E, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1522–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dalbeth N, Stamp L. Hyperuricaemia and gout: time for a new staging system? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1598–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grassi W, Meenagh G, Pascual E, Filippucci E. “Crystal clear”-sonographic assessment of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36(3):197–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Loffler C, Sattler H, Peters L, Loffler U, Uppenkamp M, Bergner R. Distinguishing gouty arthritis from calcium pyrophosphate disease and other arthritides. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(3):513–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogdie A, Taylor WJ, Weatherall M, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Neogi T, et al. Imaging modalities for the classification of gout: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1868–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D, et al. 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(10):2557–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pineda C, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Solano C, Rodriguez-Henriquez P, Hernandez-Diaz C, Vargas A, et al. Joint and tendon subclinical involvement suggestive of gouty arthritis in asymptomatic hyperuricemia: an ultrasound controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(1):R4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliva F, Via AG, Maffulli N. Physiopathology of intratendinous calcific deposition. BMC Med. 2012;10:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mallinson PI, Reagan AC, Coupal T, Munk PL, Ouellette H, Nicolaou S. The distribution of urate deposition within the extremities in gout: a review of 148 dual-energy CT cases. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(3):277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Tips and tricks to recognize microcrystalline arthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51(7):vii18–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zufferey P, Valcov R, Fabreguet I, Dumusc A, Omoumi P, So A. A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuttaya Pattamapaspong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Withawat Vuthiwong
    • 1
  • Thanat Kanthawang
    • 1
  • Worawit Louthrenoo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations