Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 523–531 | Cite as

Sex- and age-specific differences in femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology among healthy subjects—derivation of normal ranges and thresholds for abnormality

  • Dai MiyasakaEmail author
  • Yoshinori Sakai
  • Shinya Ibuchi
  • Hayato Suzuki
  • Norio Imai
  • Naoto Endo
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to clarify sex- and age-specific differences in three-dimensional and anatomic characteristics of femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology in healthy subjects.

Materials and Methods

The study included 120 healthy subjects (57 male, 63 female), stratified into groups according to age and sex. We used computed tomography data to measure various anatomic alignment parameters describing femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology.

Results

The lateral sector angle in the coronal plane, anterior sector angle in the sagittal plane, and posterior sector angles in the axial plane, which characterize femoral head coverage, did not differ significantly between males and females. However, the Sharp angle in the coronal plane and acetabular anteversion in both the sagittal and axial planes were significantly larger in females than in males. Overall, the age-specific trends were similar between male and female subjects. Specifically, for both males and females, the values for parameters of femoral head coverage were significantly lower in younger subjects (<50 years) than in older subjects (≥50 years); the only exception was the posterior sector angle among females; regarding acetabular morphology, younger subjects showed significantly higher values for the acetabular roof obliquity and Sharp angle, but no difference between younger and older subjects was noted regarding acetabular anteversion in the sagittal or axial plane.

Conclusion

Our data regarding sex- and age-specific differences and estimated normal ranges for parameters characterizing femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology among healthy subjects can be used to predict normal hip morphology.

Keywords

Hip Femoral head coverage Acetabular morphology Healthy Normal range 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Izumi Minato, MD, PhD (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata Rinko Hospital), and Yoichiro Dohmae, MD, PhD (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata Banndai Hospital), for invaluable advice for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent for undergoing the CT procedures was obtained from each subject. The requirement for informed consent for participation in the study was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hipp JA, Sugano N, Millis MB, Murphy SB. Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;364:134–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Søballe K, Gebuhr P, Lund B. Hip dysplasia and osteoarthrosis: a survey of 4151 subjects from the Osteoarthrosis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:149–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiberg G. The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:7–38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1961;43:268–72.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:985–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A. Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117:330–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shi YY, Liu TJ, Zhao Q, Zhang LJ, Ji SJ, Wang EB. The normal centre-edge angle of Wiberg in the Chinese population: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2010;92:1144–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siebenrock KA, Kistler L, Schwab JM, Büchler L, Tannest M. The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3355–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larson CM, Moreau-Gaudry A, Kelly BT, et al. Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1247–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dandachli W, Kannan V, Richards R, Shah Z, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J. Analysis of cover of the femoral head in normal and dysplastic hips: new CT-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:1428–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyasaka D, Ito T, Imai N, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of femoral head coverage in normal and dysplastic hips: a novel method. Acta Med Okayama. 2014;68:277–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ariumi A, Sato T, Kobayashi K, et al. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment in the weight-bearing standing position in healthy elderly subjects. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:64–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanifuji O, Sato T, Kobayashi K, et al. Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:710–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janzen DL, Aippersbach SE, Munk PL, et al. Three-dimensional CT measurement of adult acetabular dysplasia: technique, preliminary results in normal subjects, and potential applications. Skelet Radiol. 1998;27:352–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anda S, Svenningsen S, Dale LG, Benum P. The acetabular sector angle of the adult hip determined by computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 1986;27:443–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tӧnnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Berlin: Springer; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akiyama M, Nakashima Y, Fujii M, et al. Femoral anteversion is correlated with acetabular version and coverage in Asian women with anterior and global deficient subgroups of hip dysplasia: a CT study. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:1411–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:190–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perreira AC, Hunter JC, Laird T, Jamali AA. Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:552–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murtha PE, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, DiGioia 3rd AM. Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stem ES, O’Connor MI, Kransdorf MJ, Crook J. Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. Skelet Radiol. 2006;35:385–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tallroth K, Lepistö J. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: normal values for correction of dysplasia. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:598–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ito H, Matsuno T, Hirayama T, Tanino H, Yamanaka Y, Minami A. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of non-osteoarthritic adult acetabular dysplasia. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38:131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    VandenBerg C, Crawford EA, Sibilsky Enselman E, Robbins CB, Wojtys EM, Bedi A. Restricted hip rotation is correlated with an increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy. 2016;in press. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.014

Copyright information

© ISS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dai Miyasaka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yoshinori Sakai
    • 1
  • Shinya Ibuchi
    • 1
  • Hayato Suzuki
    • 1
  • Norio Imai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Naoto Endo
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant MedicineNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceNiigata CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Comprehensive Geriatrics in CommunityNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations