Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 45, Issue 7, pp 955–958 | Cite as

Sex differences in the radial grooves in the first extensor compartment

  • Ilke A. Gurses
  • Rustu Turkay
  • Ercan Inci
  • Suna Ors
  • Yilmaz Onal
  • Sevda Ozel
  • Meltem Vural
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

De Quervain tenosynovitis affects the first extensor compartment of the wrist and occurs more frequently in females. This high prevalence could not be explained by soft tissue. As the osseous anatomy has been mostly neglected, we aimed to compare the distal radius between the sexes.

Materials and methods

We evaluated the presence of a bony ridge on the floor of the first extensor compartment on CT images with multiplanar imaging.

Results

We included 244 wrists (72 females, 172 males) in the study. A bony ridge was present in 58 (23.8 %) and absent in 186 (76.2 %) wrists. A ridge was present in 24 (33.3 %) wrists among females and 34 (19.8 %) wrists among males. A groove with a bony ridge was statistically associated with females.

Conclusion

We observed two tendon groove morphologies for the first extensor compartment. A groove with a bony ridge occurs more frequently in females. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between the high frequency of a bony ridge and increased prevalence of de Quervain tenosynovitis in females.

Keywords

Osseous morphology First extensor compartment of the wrist Radial grooves Bony ridge De Quervain disease 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank David F. Chapman, BSc., for editing the English of our article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Institutional Review Board approval (no: 2015/08/07 date: 11.05.2015) for the study was obtained.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Dang AC, Rodner CM. Unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, part I: radial nerve. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:1906–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ilyas A, Ast M, Schaffer AA, Thoder J. De Quervain tenosynovitis of the wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:757–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kay NRM. De Quervain’s disease: changing pathology or changing perception? J Hand Surg (Br). 2000;25:65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clarke MT, Lyall HA, Grant JW, Matthewson MH. The histopathology of de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Surg (Br). 1998;23:732–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Volpe A, Pavoni M, Marchetta A, et al. Ultrasound differentiation of two types of de Quervain’s disease: the role of retinaculum. Ann Rheum. 2010;69:938–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petit Le Manac’h A, Roquelaure Y, Ha C, et al. Risk factors for de Quervain’s disease in a French working population. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37:394–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka S, Petersen M, Cameron L. Prevalence and risk factors of tendinitis and related disorders of the distal upper extremity among US workers: comparison to carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:328–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker-bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:642–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolf JM, Sturdivant RX, Owens BD. Incidence of de Quervain tenosynovitis in a young, active population. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:112–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stahl S, Vida D, Meisner C, Stahl AS, Schaller HE, Held M. Work related etiology of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis: a case–control study with prospectively collected data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alemohammad AM, Yazaki N, Morris RP, Buford WL, Viegas SF. Thumb interphalangeal joint extension by the extensor pollicis brevis: association with a subcompartment and de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:719–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gousheh J, Yavari M, Arasteh E. Division of the first dorsal compartment of the hand into two separated canals: rule or exception? Arch Iran Med. 2009;12:52–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harvey FJ, Harvey PM, Horsley MW. De Quervain’s disease: surgical or nonsurgical treatment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1990;15:83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson WT, Viegas SF, Coon TM, Stimpson KD, Frogameni AD, Sımpson JM. Anatomical variations in the first extensor compartment of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:923–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minamikawa Y, Peimer CA, Cox WL, Sherwin FS. De Quervain’s syndrome: surgical and anatomical studies of the fibroosseous canal. Orthopedics. 1991;14:545–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richie CA, Brimer WW. Corticosteroid injection for treatment of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis: a pooled quantitative literature evaluation. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16:102–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witt J, Pess G, Gelberman RH. Treatment of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. A prospective study of the results of injection of steroids and immobilization in a splint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:219–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Keating-Hart E, Touchais S, Kerjean Y, Ardouin L, Le Goff B. Presence of an intracompartmental septum detected by ultrasound is associated with the failure of ultrasound-guided steroid injection in de Quervain’s syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015. doi: 10.1177/1753193415611414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kulthanan T, Chareonwat B. Variations in abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons in the Quervain syndrome: a surgical and anatomical study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41:36–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mirzanli C, Ozturk K, Esenyel CZ, Ayanoglu S, Imren Y, Aliustaoglu S. Accuracy of intrasheath injection techniques for de Quervain’s disease: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37:155–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Motoura H, Shiozaki K, Kawasaki K. Anatomical variations in the tendon sheath of the first compartment. Anat Sci Int. 2010;85:145–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nayak SR, Hussein M, Krishnamurthy A, et al. Variation and clinical significance of extensor pollicis brevis: a study in South Indian cadavers. Chang Gang Med J. 2009;32:600–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shiraishi N, Matsumura G. Anatomical variations of the extensor pollicis brevis tendon and abductor pollicis tendon. Relation to tenosynovectomy. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2005;82:25–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahakkanukrauh P, Mahakkanukrauh C. Incidence of a septum in the first dorsal compartment and its effects on therapy of de Quervain’s disease. Clin Anat. 2000;13:195–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rousset P, Vuillemin-Bodaghi V, Laredo JD, Parlier-Cuau C. Anatomic variations in the first extensor compartment of the wrist: accuracy of US. Radiology. 2010;257:427–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao L, Li YK, Ye GH, Yang XW. Variations in the extensor grooves on the radial styloid process in Chinese population. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;35:49–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gurses IA, Coskun O, Gayretli O, Kale A, Ozturk A. The anatomy of the fibrous and osseous components of the first extensor compartment of the wrist: a cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:773–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee KH, Kang CN, Lee BG, Jung WS, Kim DY, Lee CH. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the first extensor compartment of the wrist in de Quervain’s disease. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:49–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Choi SJ, Ahn JH, Lee YJ, et al. De Quervain disease: US identification of anatomic variations in the first extensor compartment with an emphasis on subcompartmentalization. Radiology. 2011;260:480–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glajchen N, Schweitzer M. MRI features in de Quervain’s tenosynovitis of the wrist. Skelet Radiol. 1996;25:63–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hadidy A, Hadidy S, Haroun A, et al. De Quervain’s tenosynovitis imaging: ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Bahrain Med Soc. 2009;21:328–31.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stahl S, Vida D, Meisner C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the work-related cause of de Quervain tenosynovitis: a critical appraisal of its recognition as an occupational disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1479–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilke A. Gurses
    • 1
  • Rustu Turkay
    • 2
  • Ercan Inci
    • 2
  • Suna Ors
    • 2
  • Yilmaz Onal
    • 3
  • Sevda Ozel
    • 4
  • Meltem Vural
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyIstanbul Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationIstanbul Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations