Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 49–55 | Cite as

Calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: the correlation between pain and imaging features in symptomatic and asymptomatic female shoulders

  • Valerio Sansone
  • Olmo Consonni
  • Emanuele Maiorano
  • Roberto Meroni
  • Alfredo Goddi
Scientific Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Objective

To provide new epidemiological data regarding the prevalence, distribution and macroscopic features of shoulder rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (calcific tendinopathy), and to identify the characteristics of calcific deposits associated with shoulder pain.

Materials and methods

Three hundred and two female volunteers (604 shoulders) who had been referred to a gynaecological clinic participated in the study. The subjects underwent a high-resolution ultrasonography of both shoulders, and those with a diagnosis of calcific tendinopathy compiled a standardized questionnaire relating to shoulder symptoms. We determined the prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy, and compared differences in distribution and macroscopic features of the symptomatic and asymptomatic calcifications.

Results

The prevalence of calcific tendinopathy was 17.8 % (103 shoulders). Ninety-five shoulders (15.7 %) were symptomatic; of these, calcific tendinopathy was found in 34 shoulders (33 %) on imaging. Of the 509 asymptomatic (84.3 %) shoulders, calcific tendinopathy was observed in 69 cases (67 %). Among tendons, supraspinatus (53.4 %) and infraspinatus (54.6 %) were the most frequently involved. The majority of calcific deposits were of maximum diameter between 2 and 5 mm (77.9 %), and were linear in form (69.9 %). The involvement of multiple tendons and a location in the supraspinatus tendon were found to be significantly correlated with pain (p = 0.023, p = 0.043 respectively), as were age (p = 0.041) and an excessive body mass index (p = 0.024).

Conclusion

In this sample from the general population of working age females, both intrinsic factors (location in supraspinatus, multiple tendon involvement) and extrinsic variables (age, abnormally high BMI) were correlated with pain in calcific tendinopathy. Level of evidence: Level III, cross-sectional study, prevalence study.

Keywords

Calcific tendinopathy Rotator cuff Pain Ultrasonography Population-based study 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Jocelyn McCleery and Giulio Valerio Sansone for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

References

  1. 1.
    Bosworth BM. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12,122 cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1941;116:2477–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farin PU, Jaroma H. Sonographic findings of rotator cuff calcifications. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clavert P, Sirveaux F. Société française d’arthroscopie: Les tendinopathies calcifiantes de l’épaule [Shoulder calcifying tendinitis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94(8):S336–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mavrikakis ME, Drimis S, Kontoyannis DA, Rasidakis A, Moulopoulou ES, Kontoyannis S. Calcific shoulder periarthritis (tendinitis) in adult onset diabetes mellitus: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48:211–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKendry RJ, Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K, Hyslop PS. Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: prognostic value of clinical, histologic, and radiologic features in 57 surgically treated cases. J Rheumatol. 1982;9(1):75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uhthoff HK, Loehr JW. Calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:183–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Palma AF, Kruper JS. Long-term study of shoulder joints afflicted with and treated for calcific tendinitis. Clin Orthop. 1961;20:61–72.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Le Goff B, Berthelot JM, Guillot P, Glémarec J, Maugars Y. Assessment of calcific tendonitis of rotator cuff by ultrasonography: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77(3):258–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ogon P, Suedkamp NP, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, Koestler W, Maier D. Prognostic factors in nonoperative therapy for chronic symptomatic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(10):2978–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Wu JJ, Hsu CC, Huang DY, Chang CY. Evaluation of calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff: role of color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(3):289–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papatheodorou A, Ellinas P, Takis F, Tsanis A, Maris I, Batakis N. US of the shoulder: rotator cuff and non-rotator cuff disorders. Radiographics. 2006;26(1), e23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears: comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(4):708–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Entrekin RR, Porter BA, Sillesen HH, Wong AD, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2001;22(1):50–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardized Nordic Questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18:233–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sansone V, Meroni R, Boria P, Pisani S, Maiorano E. Are occupational repetitive movements of the upper arm associated with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathies? Rheumatol Int. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3086-z.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Wu JJ, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hsu CC, et al. The role of high-resolution ultrasonography in management of calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(6):735–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Kobayashi T, Shitara H, Osawa T. Factors involved in the presence of symptoms associated with rotator cuff tears: a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(7):1133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31:589–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT, Gren LH, Alder SC, White GL, Lyon JL. Associations between body-mass index and surgery for rotator cuff tendinitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:743–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gumina S, Candela V, Passaretti D, Latino G, Venditto T, Mariani L, et al. The association between body fat and rotator cuff tear: the influence on rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(11):1669–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frot M, Feine JS, Bushnell MC. Sex differences in pain perception and anxiety: a psychophysical study with topical capsaicin. Pain. 2004;108:230–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerio Sansone
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olmo Consonni
    • 1
  • Emanuele Maiorano
    • 1
  • Roberto Meroni
    • 3
  • Alfredo Goddi
    • 4
  1. 1.Orthopaedic Department of the Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi IRCCSMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Surgery and Interdisciplinary Medicine, Program in Physical TherapyUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  4. 4.SME – Diagnostic Imaging Medical CentreVareseItaly

Personalised recommendations