Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 653–657 | Cite as

A comparison of magnetic resonance arthrography and arthroscopic findings in the assessment of anterior shoulder dislocations

  • R. W. JordanEmail author
  • R. Naeem
  • K. Srinivas
  • G. Shyamalan
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to establish the sensitivity and specificity of MRA in the investigation of patients with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing both magnetic resonance arthrography and arthroscopic assessment after a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation between January 2011 and 2014 was performed. Demographic data were collected from electronic records. Images were interpreted by 8 musculoskeletal radiologists and patients were treated by 8 consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Arthroscopic findings were obtained from surgical notes and these findings were used as a reference for MRA. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated for the different injuries.

Results

Sixty-nine patients underwent both an MRA and shoulder arthroscopy during the study period; however, clinical notes were unavailable in 9 patients. Fifty-three patients (88 %) were male, the mean age was 28 years (range 18 to 50) and 16 subjects (27 %) had suffered a primary dislocation. The overall sensitivity and specificity of MRA to all associated injuries was 0.9 (CI 0.83–0.95) and 0.94 (CI 0.9–0.96) retrospectively. The lowest sensitivity was seen in osseous Bankart 0.8 (CI 0.44–0.96) and superior labral tear (SLAP) lesions 0.5 (CI 0.14–0.86). The overall positive predictive value was 0.88 (CI 0.76–0.91) with the lowest values found in rotator cuff 0.4 (CI 0.07–0.83) and glenohumeral ligament (GHL) lesions 0.29 (CI 0.05–0.7).

Conclusion

Magnetic resonance angiography has a high sensitivity when used to identify associated injuries in shoulder dislocation, although in 8 patients (13 %) arthroscopy identified an additional injury. The overall agreement between MRA and arthroscopic findings was good, but the identification of GHL and rotator cuff injuries was poor.

Keywords

Shoulder Dislocation Instability Magnetic resonance imaging Arthroscopy 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and that no funding was received during the production of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Veillette C, et al. Epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction in Ontario. Can Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):442–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zacchilli MA, Owens BD. Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(3):542–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith T. Immobilisation following traumatic anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation. Injury. 2006;37(3):228–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalidis B, Sachinis N, Dimitriou C, Papadopoulos P, Samoladas E, Pournaras J. Has the management of shoulder dislocation changed over time. Int Orthop. 2007;31(3):385–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hovelius L, Augustini B, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1677–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kralinger F, Gloser W, Wischatta R, Wambacher M, Sperner G. Predicting recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2002;20:41–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson CM, Dobson RJ. Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2004;86:469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malhotra A, Freudmann MS, Hay SM. Management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the 17- to 25-year age group: a dramatic evolution of practice. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(4):545–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chahal JL, Marks PH, Macdonald PB, et al. Anatomic Bankart repair compared with nonoperative treatment and/or arthroscopic lavage for first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):565–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill H, Sachs M. The groove defect of the humeral head. A frequently unrecognised complication of dislocations of the shoulder joint. Radiology. 1940;35:690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bankart AS. Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder-joint. Br Med J. 1923;2(3285):1132–3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reuss BL, Schwartzberg R, Zlatkin MB, Cooperman A, Dixon JR. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions in the community setting: eighty-three arthroscopically confirmed cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:580–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horst K, Von Harten R, Weber C, et al. Assessment of coincidence and defect sizes in Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions after anterior shoulder dislocation: a radiological study. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yu AB, Yung PS, Chan KM, Ahuja AT. First-time shoulder dislocation: high prevalence of labral injury and age-related differences revealed by MR arthrography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(4):983–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanders TG, Zlatkin M, Montgomery J. Imaging of glenohumeral instability. Semin Roentgenol. 2010;45(3):160–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jana M, Srivastava DN, Sharma R, et al. Magnetic resonance arthrography for assessing severity of glenohumeral labroligamentous lesions. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(2):230–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH. Complications of arthrography. Radiology. 1985;155(3):605–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Veen HC, Collins JP, Rijk PC. Value of magnetic resonance arthrography in post-traumatic anterior shoulder instability prior to arthroscopy: a prospective evaluation of MRA versus arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(3):371–5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW. The Bankart procedure: a long-term end result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(1):1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor DC, Arciero RA. Pathologic changes associated with shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopic and physical examination findings in first-time, traumatic anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:306–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jonas SC, Walton MJ, Sarangi PP. Is MRA an unnecessary expense in the management of a clinically unstable shoulder? A comparison of MRA and arthroscopic findings in 90 patients. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(3):267–70.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parmar H, Jhankaria B, Maheshwari M, Singrakhia M, Shanbag S, Chawla A, et al. Magnetic resonance arthrography in recurrent anterior shoulder instability as compared to arthroscopy: a prospective comparative study. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(4):270–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL. Anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic criteria determined from prospective analysis of 121 arthrograms. Radiology. 1995;197(3):819–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1994;190(3):645–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayes ML, Collins MS, Morgan JA, Wenger DE, Dahm DL. Efficacy of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for articular cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint in patients with instability. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:1199–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, Rokito A, Schmahmann S, Mota J. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology. 2000;241(1):267–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Connolly KP, Schwartzberg RS, Reuss B, Crumble Jr D, Homan BM. Sensitivity and specificity of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging reports in the diagnosis of type-II superior labral anterior-posterior lesions in the community setting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(4):308–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Jordan
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Naeem
    • 1
  • K. Srinivas
    • 1
  • G. Shyamalan
    • 1
  1. 1.Birmingham Heartlands HospitalBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations