Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 1377–1385 | Cite as

Carpal pseudoerosions: a plain X-ray interpretation pitfall

  • Richard WawerEmail author
  • Jean François Budzik
  • Xavier Demondion
  • Gerard Forzy
  • Anne Cotten
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

To examine in detail images of pseudoerosion of the wrist and hand on plain radiographs.

Material and methods

The study was conducted with 28 cadaver wrists. During a single imaging session three techniques—plain radiography, tomosynthesis, and computed tomography—were used to visualize the wrist and hand specimens. For each technique, 20 radio-ulno-carpo-metacarpal sites known to present bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis were analyzed by two radiologists using a standard system to score the cortical bone: normal, pseudoerosion, true erosion, or other pathology. Cohen’s concordance analysis was performed to determine inter-observer and intra-observer (for the senior radiologist) agreement by site and by technique. Serial sections of two cadaver specimens were examined to determine the anatomical correlation of the pseudoerosions.

Results

On the plain radiographs, the radiologists scored many images as pseudoerosion (7.3 %), particularly in the distal ulnar portion of the capitate, the distal radial portion of the hamate, the proximal ulnar portion of the base of the third metacarpal, the proximal radial portion of the base of the fourth metacarpal, the distal ulnar portion of the hamate, and the proximal portion of the base of the fifth metacarpal. The computed tomography scan revealed that none of these doubtful images corresponded to true erosions. The anatomical correlation study showed that these images could probably be attributed to ligament insertions, thinner lamina, and enhanced cortical bone transparency.

Conclusion

Knowledge of the anatomical carpal localizations where pseudoerosions commonly occur is a necessary prerequisite for analysis of plain radiographs performed to diagnose or monitor rheumatoid arthritis.

Keywords

Erosion Pseudoerosion Wrist Rheumatoid arthritis Radiography Tomosynthesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Maurice Demeulaere (Anatomy Laboratory, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France). The radiographers’ team from the Musculoskeletal Imaging Department, CHRU Lille, France.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sommer OJ, Kladosek A, Weiler V, Czembirek H, Boeck M, Stiskal M. Rheumatoid arthritis: a practical guide to state-of-the-art imaging, image interpretation, and clinical implications. Radiographics. 2005;25(2):381–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van der Heijde DM. Radiographic imaging: the ‘gold standard’ for assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39 Suppl 1:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Heijde D, Dankert T, Nieman F, Rau R, Boers M. Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(10):941–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alasaarela E, Suramo I, Tervonen O, Lahde S, Takalo R, Hakala M. Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(11):1152–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cimmino MA, Bountis C, Silvestri E, Garlaschi G, Accardo S. An appraisal of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;30(3):180–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farrant JM, Grainger AJ, O’Connor PJ. Advanced imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: part 2: erosions. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36(5):381–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Hasselquist M, Narvestad E, Moller J, Thomsen HS, et al. Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(1):R25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canella C, Philippe P, Pansini V, Salleron J, Flipo RM, Cotten A. Use of tomosynthesis for erosion evaluation in rheumatoid arthritic hands and wrists. Radiology. 2011;258(1):199–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckland-Wright JC. Microfocal radiographic examination of erosions in the wrist and hand of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43(2):160–71.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narvaez JA, Narvaez J, De Lama E, De Albert M. MR imaging of early rheumatoid arthritis. Radiographics. 2010;30(1):143–63. discussion 63–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McQueen FM, Benton N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, McLean L, et al. What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(9):859–68.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McQueen FM, Benton N, Perry D, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(7):1814–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McQueen F, Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Lassere M, Ejbjerg B, Bird P, et al. Pitfalls in scoring MR images of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 1:i48–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taouli B, Zaim S, Peterfy CG, Lynch JA, Stork A, Guermazi A, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(4):937–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nakamura K, Patterson RM, Viegas SF. The ligament and skeletal anatomy of the second through fifth carpometacarpal joints and adjacent structures. J Hand Surg. 2001;26(6):1016–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Theumann NH, Pfirrmann CW, Chung CB, Antonio GE, Trudell DJ, Resnick D. Ligamentous and tendinous anatomy of the intermetacarpal and common carpometacarpal joints: evaluation with MR imaging and MR arthrography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26(1):145–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dzwierzynski WW, Matloub HS, Yan JG, Deng S, Sanger JR, Yousif NJ. Anatomy of the intermetacarpal ligaments of the carpometacarpal joints of the fingers. J Hand Surg. 1997;22(5):931–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ritt MJ, Berger RA, Kauer JM. The gross and histologic anatomy of the ligaments of the capitohamate joint. J Hand Surg. 1996;21(6):1022–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gunther SF. The carpometacarpal joints. Orthop Clin N Am. 1984;15(2):259–77.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ejbjerg B, Narvestad E, Rostrup E, Szkudlarek M, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of wrist and finger joints in healthy subjects occasionally shows changes resembling erosions and synovitis as seen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(4):1097–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savnik A, Malmskov H, Thomsen HS, Graff LB, Nielsen H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, et al. MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(5):1203–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Wawer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean François Budzik
    • 1
    • 4
  • Xavier Demondion
    • 2
    • 5
  • Gerard Forzy
    • 3
  • Anne Cotten
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Groupement des Hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille, Service d’imagerie médicaleHôpital St Vincent de Paul, Faculté Libre de Médecine, Université Catholique de LilleLilleFrance
  2. 2.Service d’imagerie musculosquelettique, Centre de consultation et d’imagerie de l’appareil locomoteurHôpital Roger Salengro, 2, Bld du Pr Laine, CHRU Lille, Université Lille2LilleFrance
  3. 3.Groupement des hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille, Laboratoire de biologie, Département de biostatistiquesHôpital St Philibert, Faculté Libre de Médecine, Université Catholique de LilleLommeFrance
  4. 4.Unité de recherche EA 4490, Physiopathologie des maladies osseuses inflammatoiresUniversité Nord de France, Quai Masset, Bassin NapoléonBoulogne sur MerFrance
  5. 5.Laboratoire d’Anatomie, faculté de Médecine de LillePôle RechercheLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations