Minimum joint space width (mJSW) of patellofemoral joint on standing “skyline” radiographs: test-retest reproducibility and comparison with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI)
- 311 Downloads
To assess the intraobserver, interobserver, and test-retest reproducibility of minimum joint space width (mJSW) measurement of medial and lateral patellofemoral joints on standing “skyline” radiographs and to compare the mJSW of the patellofemoral joint to the mean cartilage thickness calculated by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI).
Materials and methods
A couple of standing “skyline” radiographs of the patellofemoral joints and MRI of 55 knees of 28 volunteers (18 females, ten males, mean age, 48.5 ± 16.2 years) were obtained on the same day. The mJSW of the patellofemoral joint was manually measured and Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) was independently assessed by two observers. The mJSW was compared to the mean cartilage thickness of patellofemoral joint calculated by qMRI.
mJSW of the medial and lateral patellofemoral joint showed an excellent intraobserver agreement (interclass correlation (ICC) = 0.94 and 0.96), interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.90 and 0.95) and test-retest agreement (ICC = 0.92 and 0.96). The mJSW measured on radiographs was correlated to mean cartilage thickness calculated by qMRI (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001 for the medial PFJ and r = 0.81, p < 0.0001 for the lateral PFJ). However, there was a lack of concordance between radiographs and qMRI for extreme values of joint width and KLG. Radiographs yielded higher joint space measures than qMRI in knees with a normal joint space, while qMRI yielded higher joint space measures than radiographs in knees with joint space narrowing and higher KLG.
Standing “skyline” radiographs are a reproducible tool for measuring the mJSW of the patellofemoral joint. The mJSW of the patellofemoral joint on radiographs are correlated with, but not concordant with, qMRI measurements.
KeywordsPatellofemoral joint Radiography Magnetic resonance imaging Articular cartilage Osteoarthritis knee Radiography Adult
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- 9.Boegård T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, et al. Joint-space width in the axial view of the patello-femoral joint. Definitions and comparison with MR imaging. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 1998;39:24–31.Google Scholar
- 12.Egund N. The axial view of the patello-femoral joint. Description of a new radiographic method for routine use. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1986;27(1):101–4.Google Scholar
- 16.Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1968; Suppl 277:7–72.Google Scholar
- 19.Eckstein F, Schnier M, Haubner M, et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;352:137–48.Google Scholar
- 26.Graichen H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, et al. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:811–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Buckland-Wright C. Protocols for precise radio-anatomical positioning of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil Oars Osteoarthr Res Soc. 1995;3(A):71–80.Google Scholar
- 33.Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy Jr WA, et al. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil Oars Osteoarthr Res Soc. 1995;3(A):3–70.Google Scholar
- 34.Settegast J. Typische roentgenbilder von normalen menschen. Lehmanns med. Atlanten. 1921;5:211.Google Scholar