Paleopathological findings in radiographs of ancient and modern Greek skulls
- 454 Downloads
The skull, when portrayed radiologically, can be a useful tool in detecting signs of systemic diseases and results of pathological growth mechanisms. The aim of this study was therefore to examine, compare, and classify findings in cranial configuration of pathological origin, in modern and ancient skulls.
Materials and methods
The material consists of 240 modern and 141 ancient dry skulls. Three radiographs for each skull (lateral, anteroposterior, basilar) provide enough evidence for differential diagnoses.
Cases of osteoporosis are among the interesting pathological findings. A prevalence of female modern skulls in those determined as osteoporotic skulls is noted. Special interest is placed on the area of the sella turcica and many variations, regarding the shape and texture, are recognized both in ancient and modern skulls. Malignancies and important causes of cranial destruction are identified in both skull collections. Diploid thickening and osteolytic areas appear commonly among ancient remains. Moreover, from the ancient skull collection, one case possibly recognizable as fibrous dysplasia is noted while another case with an unusual exostosis gives rise to many questions.
Interpreted with caution, the results of the present study, which can serve as an approach of paleopathology and paleoradiology, indicate similarity trends in cranial configuration of pathologic origin in modern and ancient people. Radiography and cephalometry were the main diagnostic tools used to gather evidence and are evaluated as a quite appropriate method to examine anthropological material and assess the internal structure of skeletal remains since they are non-destructive techniques.
KeywordsRadiology Paleopathology Prehistory Greece 20th century 5th century b.c.
- 1.Zafiratos K. Paleopathology: evidence from organic remains for the health and the way of living of prehistoric people. Anthropol Analecta. 1988;49:13–9.Google Scholar
- 15.New PFJ. Sella Turcica as a mirror of disease. Rad Clin North Am. 1996;4:75–92.Google Scholar
- 17.Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Dallapiccola B. Abnormalities of the sella turcica. Abnormal skeletal phenotypes. From simple signs to complex diagnoses. Berlin: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
- 20.Friedland B, Meazzini MC. Incidental finding of an enlarged sella turcica on a lateral cephalogram. Am J Orthod. 1996;110(5):508–12.Google Scholar
- 22.Penkrot RJ, Bures C. The “apparently” eroded dorsum sella: a new anomaly. Ame Roentgen Ray Soc. 1979;132:1005–6.Google Scholar
- 23.Giannetti AV, Guimarães RE, Santiago AP, Perpétuo FO, Machado MA. A tomographic study of the skull base in primary spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Neuroradiology. 2011 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 24.Dublin AB, Poirier VC. Fracture of the sella turcica. Am J Roentgenol. 1976;127:969–72.Google Scholar
- 31.Nichols RD, Fujita S, Muzaffar K, Olson NR. Destructive lesions of the sphenoid sinus. ORL. 1974;78:3359–367.Google Scholar
- 36.Tsementzis SA. Neuroradiology. Differential Diagnosis in Neurology and Neurosurgery. A Clinician’s Pocket Guide. Leipzig: Thieme Verlag; 1999.Google Scholar