Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 10, pp 1309–1314

Multimodality correlations of patellar height measurement on X-ray, CT, and MRI

  • Pearlene P. Lee
  • Majid Chalian
  • John A. Carrino
  • John Eng
  • Avneesh Chhabra
Scientific Article



To investigate whether the universally accepted range of normal patellar height ratios derived from radiography for the Insall–Salvati (IS) and Blackburne–Peel (BP) methods could be similarly applied to both CT and MRI.

Materials and methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent for this HIPPA-compliant study. A total of 45 knees in 42 patients (15 men, 27 women; age range 11 to 75 years, mean age 39 ± 20 years) who underwent tri-modality (radiograph, CT, and MRI) examinations were selected. All patients had knee imaging obtained for a variety of reasons and measurements were performed by two independent readers who were blinded to each other’s measurements or the respective measurements derived from each of the methods. Paired t test was used to compare the mean values among the modalities. Inter-observer and inter-method agreements were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients.


Statistically significant, but small quantitative differences are noted between tri-modality patellar height ratios. For comparable results, the small addition of 0.13 and 0.10 are needed for the Insall–Salvati measurements on MRI and CT respectively, compared with radiographs. For the Blackburne–Peel ratio, an additional adjustment of 0.09 is needed between radiographs and MRI, but not between radiographs and CT. These adjustments are independent of gender. The interobserver reproducibility was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.94) for both the Insall–Salvati and Blackburne–Peel methods for all modalities.


The results indicate that cut-off values for patella alta and baja derived from radiographs should not be directly transposed to CT and MRI; however, the adjustments are relatively minor. These measurements show excellent reproducibility for all modalities currently used for patellar height measurements.


Patellar height Radiograph CT MRI Insall–Salvati Blackburne–Peel Multimodality correlations 


  1. 1.
    Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM. Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1749–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park MS, Chung CY, Lee KM, Lee SH, Choi IH. Which is the best method to determine the patellar height in children and adolescents? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1344–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neyret P, Robinson AH, Le Coultre B, Lapra C, Chambat P. Patellar tendon length—the factor in patellar instability? Knee. 2002;9:3–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S. MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics. 2010;30:961–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips CL, Silver DA, Schranz PJ, Mandalia V. The measurement of patellar height: a review of the methods of imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1045–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parker L. MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:445–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F. Patellar height on sagittal MR imaging of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:339–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S. Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:231–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith TO, Davies L, Toms AP, Hing CB, Donell ST. The reliability and validity of radiological assessment for patellar instability. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:399–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers BA, Thornton-Bott P, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Interobserver variation in the measurement of patellar height after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:484–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berg EE, Mason SL, Lucas MJ. Patellar height ratios. A comparison of four measurement methods. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:218–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ali SA, Helmer R, Terk MR. Patella alta: lack of correlation between patellotrochlear cartilage congruence and commonly used patellar height ratios. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1361–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miura H, Kawamura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y. Is patellar height really lower after high tibial osteotomy? Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 1997;88:261–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reider B, Marshall JL, Koslin B, Ring B, Girgis FG. The anterior aspect of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:351–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pearlene P. Lee
    • 1
  • Majid Chalian
    • 1
  • John A. Carrino
    • 1
  • John Eng
    • 1
  • Avneesh Chhabra
    • 1
  1. 1.Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations