The trochlear cleft: the “black line” of the trochlear trough
- 484 Downloads
The “cartilage black line sign” is a recently described T2 dark cartilage lesion that we have identified appearing as a cleft in the trochlear trough. The purpose of our study was to define the MR imaging characteristics of a trochlear cleft, determine its incidence, and correlate the MR findings with arthroscopy.
Materials and methods
A total of 1,300 consecutive MR examinations of the knee were retrospectively reviewed by consensus of two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. The MR imaging characteristics and location of a trochlear cleft were determined. Imaging results were compared to arthroscopy when available. Patient age and gender were compared to 25 randomly selected control patients without trochlear clefts.
A total of 25 (1.9%) individuals (11 females and 14 males; age range 19–45 years; mean age 28 years) were diagnosed with a trochlear cleft. The control group consisted of 11 females and 14 males; age range 19–83 years; mean age 46 years. Mean cleft length was 7 mm (range 6–12 mm); cleft location was consistently in the lower trochlear trough. No full-thickness cartilage defects were identified in the eight individuals in whom arthroscopic correlation was available. A grade 2 cartilage lesion was identified in a single individual; another progressed from grade 0 to a full-thickness trochlear lesion over an 8-month interval. Eight individuals were athletes. No significant difference in gender was noted between the two groups, however, the study group was significantly younger p < 0.0001.
A trochlear cleft is a rare finding in young active individuals. It most likely indicates an incomplete cartilage fissure which may rarely progress to a full-thickness defect.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance Knee Cartilage Black line Cleft
- 1.Resnick D, Niwayama G. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988. p. 1365–442.Google Scholar
- 2.Gold GE, Mosher TJ. New MRI techniques for osteoarthritis. In: Bruno MA, Mosher TJ, Gold GE, editors. Arthritis in color: advanced imaging of arthritis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2009. p. 153–92.Google Scholar
- 3.Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG et al. Accuracy of T2-weighed fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR. 1999;172:1073–80.Google Scholar
- 4.Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Hass SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. JBJS. 1998;80:1276–84.Google Scholar
- 6.Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods M, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA, Reeder SB. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. AJR. 2011;196:159–67.Google Scholar
- 9.Broderick L, Turner D, Renfrew D, Schnitzer T, Huff J, Harris C. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy. AJR. 1994;162:99–103.Google Scholar
- 10.Hodler J, Berthiaume MJ, Schweitzer ME, Resnick D. Knee joint hyaline cartilage defects: a comparative study of MR and anatomic sections. JCAT. 1992;16:597–603.Google Scholar
- 12.Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg 1961 179-190Google Scholar
- 17.Erickson SJ, Prost RW, Timins ME. The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology. 1993;188 (1):23–5.Google Scholar
- 18.Pfirrmann CWA, Duc SR, Zanetti M, Dora C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology. 2008;249(1):236–41.Google Scholar
- 20.Choi J, Gold GE. MR imagining of articular cartilage physiology. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19:249–82.Google Scholar
- 21.Goodwin DW. MRI appearance of normal articular cartilage. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19:215–27.Google Scholar