Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1121–1126 | Cite as

The trochlear cleft: the “black line” of the trochlear trough

  • Robert D. WissmanEmail author
  • Jerrell Ingalls
  • Joshua Nepute
  • Nathaniel Von Fischer
  • Rupa Radhakrishnan
  • Daniel Hendry
  • Keith Kenter
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

The “cartilage black line sign” is a recently described T2 dark cartilage lesion that we have identified appearing as a cleft in the trochlear trough. The purpose of our study was to define the MR imaging characteristics of a trochlear cleft, determine its incidence, and correlate the MR findings with arthroscopy.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,300 consecutive MR examinations of the knee were retrospectively reviewed by consensus of two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. The MR imaging characteristics and location of a trochlear cleft were determined. Imaging results were compared to arthroscopy when available. Patient age and gender were compared to 25 randomly selected control patients without trochlear clefts.

Results

A total of 25 (1.9%) individuals (11 females and 14 males; age range 19–45 years; mean age 28 years) were diagnosed with a trochlear cleft. The control group consisted of 11 females and 14 males; age range 19–83 years; mean age 46 years. Mean cleft length was 7 mm (range 6–12 mm); cleft location was consistently in the lower trochlear trough. No full-thickness cartilage defects were identified in the eight individuals in whom arthroscopic correlation was available. A grade 2 cartilage lesion was identified in a single individual; another progressed from grade 0 to a full-thickness trochlear lesion over an 8-month interval. Eight individuals were athletes. No significant difference in gender was noted between the two groups, however, the study group was significantly younger p < 0.0001.

Conclusions

A trochlear cleft is a rare finding in young active individuals. It most likely indicates an incomplete cartilage fissure which may rarely progress to a full-thickness defect.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance Knee Cartilage Black line Cleft 

References

  1. 1.
    Resnick D, Niwayama G. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988. p. 1365–442.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gold GE, Mosher TJ. New MRI techniques for osteoarthritis. In: Bruno MA, Mosher TJ, Gold GE, editors. Arthritis in color: advanced imaging of arthritis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2009. p. 153–92.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG et al. Accuracy of T2-weighed fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR. 1999;172:1073–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Hass SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. JBJS. 1998;80:1276–84.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacMahon PJ. Palmer WE A biomechanical approach to MRI of acute knee injuries. AJR. 2011;197(3):568–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods M, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA, Reeder SB. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. AJR. 2011;196:159–67.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephens T, Diduch DR, Balin JI, Gaskin CM. The cartilage black line sign: an unexpected MRI appearance of deep cartilage fissuring in three patients. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(1):113–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, Dillingham M, Lang Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2004;231:31–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broderick L, Turner D, Renfrew D, Schnitzer T, Huff J, Harris C. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy. AJR. 1994;162:99–103.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hodler J, Berthiaume MJ, Schweitzer ME, Resnick D. Knee joint hyaline cartilage defects: a comparative study of MR and anatomic sections. JCAT. 1992;16:597–603.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B:752–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg 1961 179-190Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodwin DW, Wadghiri YZ, Dunn JF. Micro-imaging of articular cartilage: T2, proton density and the magic angle effect. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:790–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mlynarik V, Degrassi A, Toffanin R, et al. Investigation of laminar appearance of articular cartilage by means of magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;14(4):435–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xia Y, Farquhar T, Burton-Wurster N, et al. Origin of cartilage laminae in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:887–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Morova-Protzner I, et al. Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. Radiology. 1993;188(1):219–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erickson SJ, Prost RW, Timins ME. The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology. 1993;188 (1):23–5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfirrmann CWA, Duc SR, Zanetti M, Dora C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology. 2008;249(1):236–41.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark JM. The Organization of Collagen in Cryofractured Rabbit Articular Cartilage: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. J Orthop Res. 1985;3:17–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi J, Gold GE. MR imagining of articular cartilage physiology. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19:249–82.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goodwin DW. MRI appearance of normal articular cartilage. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19:215–27.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frankel VH. Biomechanics of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1971;2:175–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beck PR, Thomas AL, Farr J, Lewis PB, Cole BJ. Trochlear contact pressures after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1710–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Wissman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jerrell Ingalls
    • 2
  • Joshua Nepute
    • 1
  • Nathaniel Von Fischer
    • 1
  • Rupa Radhakrishnan
    • 1
  • Daniel Hendry
    • 1
  • Keith Kenter
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Desert RadiologistsLas VegasUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations