Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 659–665 | Cite as

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip is dependent on specialist training of the radiologist

  • Ciara M. McGuire
  • Peter MacMahon
  • Damien P. Byrne
  • Eoin Kavanagh
  • Kevin J. Mulhall
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

Significant differences between magnetic resonance imaging reports and intraoperative findings at the time of hip arthroscopy were documented in our practice. We sought to examine the accuracy of radiological reporting of hip pathology based on the training level of the reporting radiologist.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of hip arthroscopies carried out between July 2008 and June 2009 identified 61 cases where original MRI scans had been reported by general community radiologists. These scans were then reviewed by musculoskeletal specialist radiologists who were blinded to both the original report and the surgical findings. Accuracy of both subsets of radiologists was compared to arthroscopic findings with regard to labral, acetabular, femoral and impingement lesions.

Results

Musculoskeletal radiologists performed better than community radiologists in terms of overall accuracy. Accuracy rates for MSK radiologists were 85, 79, 59, and 82% for labral, acetabular chondrosis, and femoral chondrosis and impingement lesions, respectively. Whereas accuracy rates for community radiologists were 70, 28, 52, and 59% (p values = 0.08, <0.001, 0.59, <0.001). Accuracy was significantly improved for both groups of radiologists when MR arthrograms were reviewed rather than conventional MRIs.

Conclusions

This study establishes the relationship between accuracy of reporting and the training level of the performing radiologists.

Keywords

Hip arthroscopy Magnetic resonance imaging Musculoskeletal radiologist Training 

References

  1. 1.
    Edwards DJ, Lomas D, Villar RN. Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(3):374–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hong RJ, Hughes TH, Gentili A, Chung CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(3):435–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mintz DN, Hooper T, Connell D, Buly R, Padgett DE, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(4):385–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freedman BA, Potter BK, Dinauer PA, Giuliani JR, Kuklo TR, Murphy KP. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography for Czerny stage II and III acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(7):742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, Lewin JS, Lieberman JM, Buly R. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1996;200(1):231–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A, Tschauner C, Engel A, Recht MP, et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology. 1996;200(1):225–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Czerny C, Hofmann S, Urban M, Tschauner C, Neuhold A, Pretterklieber M, et al. MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(2):345–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersbock A, Ito K, Ganz R. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(2):230–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan YS, Lien LC, Hsu HL, Wan YL, Lee MS, Hsu KY, et al. Evaluating hip labral tears using magnetic resonance arthrography: a prospective study comparing hip arthroscopy and magnetic resonance arthrography diagnosis. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(10):1250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keeney JA, Peelle MW, Jackson J, Rubin D, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:163–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcea G, Mahmoud A, Ong SL, Rees Y, Berry DP, Dennison AR. Caveat reporting in ultrasound interpretation of surgical pathology: a comparison of sonographer versus radiologist. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study. Radiology. 2007;242(1):152–61.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology. 2006;241(2):355–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Vliet EP, Hermans JJ, De Wever W, Eijkemans MJ, Steyerberg EW, Faasse C, et al. Radiologist experience and CT examination quality determine metastasis detection in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(11):2475–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Theodoropoulos JS, Andreisek G, Harvey EJ, Wolin P. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: dependence on the level of training of the performing radiologist for diagnostic accuracy. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(7):661–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B:752–7.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konan SRF, Meermans G, Witt J, Haddad FS. Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):332–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmid MR, Notzli HP, Zanetti M, Wyss TF, Hodler J. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology. 2003;226(2):382–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zlatkin MB, Pevsner D, Sanders TG, Hancock CR, Ceballos CE, Herrera MF. Acetabular labral tears and cartilage lesions of the hip: indirect MR arthrographic correlation with arthroscopy–a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(3):709–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, Connolly SA, Millis MB, Palmer WE. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236(2):588–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mosher TJ. Musculoskeletal imaging at 3 T: current techniques and future applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14(1):63–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell B, McCrory P, Brukner P, O'Donnell J, Colson E, Howells R. Hip joint pathology: clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and arthroscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(3):152–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciara M. McGuire
    • 1
    • 3
  • Peter MacMahon
    • 2
  • Damien P. Byrne
    • 1
  • Eoin Kavanagh
    • 2
  • Kevin J. Mulhall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsSports Surgery Clinic, SantryDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMater Misericordiae University HospitalDublinIreland
  3. 3.DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations